Effect of analgesic modality on outcome following open liver surgery: a systematic review of postoperative analgesia.

Postoperative analgesia following liver resection remains controversial. The traditional standard of care of thoracic epidural is increasingly questioned due to perceived associated complications and delays to recovery. Evidence supporting alternative analgesic techniques is emerging however best practice is not yet established. This review aimed to evaluate the literature to assess the optimum analgesic technique following liver resection. A systematic review was conducted of trials evaluating analgesic methods in open liver surgery. Primary outcome was the postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and pain scores. Fourteen trials matching the inclusion criteria were analysed. No difference was observed in systemic complication rates between analgesic modalities. Epidural was associated with prolonged length of stay when compared with continuous wound infiltration and intrathecal morphine. Epidural offered equivalent or superior pain scores when compared to alternative techniques. In summary current evidence suggests alternative analgesic modalities may provide favorable recovery outcomes following liver surgery but consistent evidence is limited. Epidurals provide superior pain relief to alternatives but this does not translate into reduced length of stay or complication rate following liver surgery.

Tracheal intubation in the critically ill: a multi-centre national study of practice and complications.

BACKGROUND: Complications associated with tracheal intubation may occur in up to 40% of critically ill patients. Since practice in emergency airway management varies between intensive care units (ICUs) and countries, complication rates may also differ. We undertook a prospective, observational study of tracheal intubation performed by critical care doctors in Scotland to identify practice, complications, and training. METHODS: For 4 months, we collected data on any intubation performed by doctors working in critical care throughout Scotland except those in patients having elective surgery and those carried out before admission to hospital. We used a standardized data form to collect information on pre-induction physical state and organ support, the doctor carrying out the intubation, the techniques and drugs used, and complications noted. RESULTS: Data from 794 intubations were analysed. Seventy per cent occurred in ICU and 18% occurred in emergency departments. The first-time intubation success rate was 91%, no patient required more than three attempts at intubation, and one patient required surgical tracheostomy. Severe hypoxaemia ( <80%) occurred in 22%, severe hypotension (systolic arterial pressure <80 mm Hg) in 20%, and oesophageal intubation in 2%. Three-quarters of intubations were performed by doctors with more than 24 months formal anaesthetic training and all but one doctor with <6 months training had senior supervision. CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal intubation by critical care doctors in Scotland has a higher first-time success rate than described in previous reports of critical care intubation, and technical complications are few. Doctors carrying out intubation had undergone longer formal training in anaesthesia than described previously, and junior trainees are routinely supervised. Despite these good results, further work is necessary to reduce physiological complications and patient morbidity.

Management of the heartbeating brain-dead organ donor.

The main factor limiting organ donation is the availability of suitable donors and organs. Currently, most transplants follow multiple organ retrieval from heartbeating brain-dead organ donors. However, brain death is often associated with marked physiological instability, which, if not managed, can lead to deterioration in organ function before retrieval. In some cases, this prevents successful donation. There is increasing evidence that moderation of these pathophysiological changes by active management in Intensive Care maintains organ function, thereby increasing the number and functional quality of organs available for transplantation. This strategy of active donor management requires an alteration of philosophy and therapy on the part of the intensive care unit clinicians and has significant resource implications if it is to be delivered reliably and safely. Despite increasing consensus over donor management protocols, many of their components have not yet been subjected to controlled evaluation. Hence the optimal combinations of treatment goals, monitoring, and specific therapies have not yet been fully defined. More research into the component techniques is needed.

Randomized clinical trial of laxatives and oral nutritional supplements within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Routine laxatives may expedite gastrointestinal recovery and early tolerance of food within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme. Combined with carbohydrate loading and oral nutritional supplements (ONS), it may further enhance recovery of gastrointestinal function and promote earlier overall recovery. METHODS: Seventy-four patients undergoing liver resection were randomized in a two-by-two factorial design to receive either postoperative magnesium hydroxide as a laxative, preoperative carbohydrate loading and postoperative ONS, their combination or a control group. Patients were managed within an ERAS programme of care. The primary outcome measure was time to first passage of stool. Secondary outcome measures were gastric emptying, postoperative oral calorie intake, time to functional recovery and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients completed the trial. The laxative group had a significantly reduced time to passage of stool: median (interquartile range) 4 (3-5) versus 5 (4-6) days (P = 0.034). The ONS group showed a trend towards a shorter time to passage of stool (P = 0.076) but there was no evidence of interaction in patients randomized to the combination regimen. Median length of hospital stay was 6 (4-7) days. There were no differences in secondary outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: Within an ERAS protocol for patients undergoing liver resection, routine postoperative laxatives result in an earlier first passage of stool but the overall rate of recovery is unaltered.

Does delay to theatre for medical reasons affect the peri-operative mortality in patients with a fracture of the hip?

We have investigated how medical postponement, the time to surgery and the correction of medical abnormalities, according to McLaughlin criteria, before operation affected peri-operative mortality after fracture of the hip. From February to December 2007, in addition to core data, the Scottish Hip Fracture Audit collected information relating to surgical delay. Data were available for 4284 patients which allowed 30-day survival analysis to be performed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to control for differences in case-mix. Patients with major clinical abnormalities were more likely to have a postponement and had a lower unadjusted 30-day survival. The time to operation and postponement were not associated with higher mortality after adjustment for case-mix. Correction of major clinical abnormalities before surgery improved the adjusted survival, but this improvement was not significant (p = 0.10). Postponement without correction of a medical abnormality before surgery was associated with a significantly lower (p = 0.006) 30-day adjusted survival. The possible benefits of postponement need to be weighed against prolonged discomfort for the patient and the possibility of the development of other complications.

Rapid sequence induction in the emergency department: induction drug and outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVES: Etomidate is used widely for rapid sequence induction (RSI) of anaesthesia in the emergency department (ED) as a result of its relative cardiovascular stability. There is concern over possible adrenal suppression and also that outcomes could be worse than in patients given other induction drugs. This possible association has not been studied in ED patients undergoing RSI. METHODS: 525 consecutive patients who underwent RSI in the ED and were subsequently admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were reviewed. The following information was retrieved from the records: induction drug use; incidence of hypotension and vasopressor administration at induction; acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II severity of illness and predicted mortality; and ICU and hospital outcome. The choice of induction drug was not controlled but was at the discretion of the attending clinicians. RESULTS: The numbers of patients given an induction drug were 184 etomidate, 306 thiopental and 35 propofol. Patients given etomidate were older and sicker than those given thiopental or propofol. Mortality appeared greater with etomidate but there was no difference when outcome was related to pre-existing risk. Age, APACHE II score and presenting diagnosis were independent predictors of hospital mortality, but etomidate use was not. CONCLUSION: Induction drug was not related to patient outcome in this cohort of patients. The risks of developing hypotension and receiving a vasopressor at induction were greatest with propofol. Emergency physicians should choose an induction drug based on individual patient circumstances, rather than being solely concerned about adrenal suppression.

An analysis of urinary tract trauma in Scotland: imnpact on management and resource needs.

OBJECTIVE: We report the incidence, distribution, aetiology and outcome of urological trauma in a unique national database to provide an insight into its contemporary management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Scottish Trauma Audit Group prospectively collected data from severe trauma presenting to all major Scottish hospitals. We examined data from 24,666 trauma admissions from 1999 to 2002. Patients who sustained urological injuries were identified and studied in detail. RESULTS: 362 patients had urological injuries, comprising 1.5% of the trauma population, and an incidence of 1 per 45,000 head of adult population per year. Blunt injury (n = 285, 79%) was the main cause of urological trauma. Road traffic accidents were most frequent (197 patients, 54%), followed by assaults (76, 21%) and high falls (45, 12%). Renal injuries were the most common (n = 241, 67%), followed by injuries to the external genitalia (71, 20%), bladder (65, 18%), urethra (16, 4%) and ureter (3, 1%). Only 52 patients (14%) had isolated urological trauma. One hundred and fifty nine out of 310 (51%) urological patients with associated injuries were physiologically compromised on arrival in A&E, compared with only 4/52 (8%) patients with isolated urological trauma. All patients with isolated urological trauma survived, whereas 110/310 (35%) of those with associated injuries died. CONCLUSION: Urological injuries in Scotland mostly result from blunt trauma due to high-energy impacts. Isolated urological injuries are uncommon and all such patients survived. The majority of patients with urological trauma have multiple injuries and require a multi-disciplinary approach. Current urological services appear adequately distributed to cope with contemporary demands of urological trauma.

A users guide for reducing the pain of local anaesthetic administration.

Local anaesthetics (LAs) are used by medical practitioners in a number of clinical settings. The choice of agent and mode of administration is influenced by their experience, speciality and knowledge of the evidence base. Patients often express concern about the discomfort experienced during injection. Although short lived, the pain of LA administration in some patients is severe enough for them to decline future surgery. Methods to minimise the pain of LA administration relate to (1) the patient, (2) the LA, and (3) the injection technique (table 1). This article aims to provide a practical guide to doctors of all specialities who use LAs.

Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department?

AIM: To assess whether an airway assessment score based on the LEMON method is able to predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department. METHODS: Patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the resuscitation room of a UK teaching hospital between June 2002 and September 2003 were assessed on criteria based on the LEMON method. At laryngoscopy, the Cormack and Lehane grade was recorded. An airway assessment score was devised and assessed. RESULTS: 156 patients were intubated during the study period. There were 114 Cormack and Lehane grade 1 intubations, 29 grade 2 intubations, 11 grade 3 intubations, and 2 grade 4 intubations. Patients with large incisors (p<0.001), a reduced inter-incisor distance (p<0.05), or a reduced thyroid to floor of mouth distance (p<0.05) were all more likely to have a poor laryngoscopic view (grade 2, 3, or 4). Patients with a high airway assessment score were more likely to have a poor laryngoscopic view compared with those patients with a low airway assessment score (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An airway assessment score based on criteria of the LEMON method is able to successfully stratify the risk of intubation difficulty in the emergency department. Patients with a poor laryngoscopic view (grades 2, 3, or 4) were more likely to have large incisors, a reduced inter-incisor distance, and a reduced thyroid to floor of mouth distance. They were also more likely to have a higher airway assessment score than those patients with a good laryngoscopic view.

Paediatric intubation in Scottish emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Intubation of children in the emergency department setting is uncommon. This prospective observational study examines the practice of paediatric intubation in Scottish adult/paediatric urban emergency departments. METHODS: A prospective observational study of every intubation attempt was performed in seven urban Scottish emergency departments in 1999 and 2000. Children were defined as those patients who were less than 13 years of age on the day of presentation. Prehospital intubations were only included if they were performed by a mobile medical team doctor from one of the seven hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 1713 patients were identified, 44 of whom (2.6%) were children. The median age was 4 years (range 0-12 years), and 57% (25 of 44) of intubations were performed on patients with traumatic injuries. Emergency physicians attempted intubation in 27% (12 of 44) of cases, anaesthetists in 73% (32 of 44); 18% (eight of 44) of patients were intubated in nontraumatic cardiac arrest, 68% (30 of 44) underwent rapid sequence intubation (RSI), one (2%) had inhalational anaesthesia and 13 (30%) were intubated without drugs. Eighty per cent (35 of 44) of patients were intubated at the first attempt; eight patients required two attempts, and one required three attempts. Three children were intubated prehospital by mobile medical teams. Emergency physicians intubated more patients with 'physiological compromise' (100% vs 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric intubation in the emergency department is uncommon. Collaboration and appropriate training for doctors in emergency medicine, anaesthesia and paediatrics is essential.

Airway equipment in Scottish emergency departments.

Airway management is the cornerstone of resuscitation. Emergency endotracheal intubation is more likely to be difficult in the accident and emergency (A&E) department setting compared with the operating room. A&E departments must have an appropriate selection of equipment to deal with difficult airway problems. The aim of this study was to determine the type and range of equipment for airway management in A&E departments in Scotland, UK. A two-page postal survey was sent to consultants in charge of 24 A&E departments covering 98% of major trauma patients in Scotland. The response rate was 96% (23/24). Every department had equipment for basic airway management and all had laryngoscopes, stylets, gum elastic bougies and capnography. Ninety-six per cent (22/23) had equipment for performing a surgical airway and 74% (17/23) possessed laryngeal mask airways suitable for adults; only one department did not possess a suitable rescue device. Thirty per cent (7/23) of departments did not use capnography routinely to confirm correct placement of endotracheal tubes. It is concluded that airway equipment in Scottish A&E departments is adequate for basic airway care and endotracheal intubation. Nearly all departments have access to a suitable rescue device for the failed or difficult airway. Capnographic confirmation of tube placement should be mandatory in A&E.

Rapid sequence intubation in Scottish urban emergency departments.

OBJECTIVE: Airway care is the cornerstone of resuscitation. In UK emergency department practice, this care is provided by anaesthetists and emergency physicians. The aim of this study was to determine current practice for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in a sample of emergency departments in Scotland. METHODS: Two year, multicentre, prospective observational study of endotracheal intubation in the emergency departments of seven Scottish urban teaching hospitals. RESULTS: 1631 patients underwent an intubation attempt in the emergency department and 735 patients satisfied the criteria for RSI. Emergency physicians intubated 377 patients and anaesthetists intubated 355 patients. There was no difference in median age between the groups but there was a significantly greater proportion of men (73.2% versus 65.3%, p=0.024) and trauma patients (48.5% versus 37.4%, p=0.003) in the anaesthetic group. Anaesthetists had a higher initial success rate (91.8% versus 83.8%, p=0.001) and achieved more good (Cormack-Lehane Grade I and II) views at laryngoscopy (94.0% versus 89.3%, p=0.039). There was a non-significant trend to more complications in the group of patients intubated by emergency physicians (8.7% versus 12.7%, p=0.104). Emergency physicians intubated a higher proportion of patients with physiological compromise (91.8% versus 86.1%, p=0.027) and a higher proportion of patients within 15 minutes of arrival (32.6% versus 11.3%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Anaesthetists achieve more good views at laryngoscopy with higher initial success rates during RSI. Emergency physicians perform RSI on a higher proportion of critically ill patients and a higher proportion of patients within 15 minutes of arrival. Complications may be fewer in the anaesthetists' group, but this could be related to differences in patient populations. Training issues for RSI and emergency airway care are discussed. Complication rates for both groups are in keeping with previous studies.

Efficacy and kinetics of extradural ropivacaine: comparison with bupivacaine.

Ninety-one patients were allocated randomly to three groups to receive 1% ropivacaine 10 ml, 0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml or 0.5% bupivacaine 20 ml extradurally. Intermittent sensory (pinprick) and motor (Bromage scale) assessments of the block produced were recorded, with an assessment of the quality of the block and the requirement for supplementary analgesia. There was little difference between the groups in frequency, onset, duration or spread of sensory block. However, the motor block produced by 0.5% ropivacaine was less intense and of shorter duration than that with bupivacaine. The block produced by the smaller volume of ropivacaine was less reliable clinically than the larger, more dilute, solution and more anaesthetic supplements were required in that group. Cardiovascular changes were similar in all three groups. The peak plasma concentration of ropivacaine was significantly greater and T1/2 significantly shorter than those of bupivacaine, although no patient showed any features of systemic toxicity. The systemic kinetics of ropivacaine were not influenced significantly by varying the concentration or volume administered.

Effect of adrenaline on plasma concentrations of bupivacaine following lower limb nerve block.

Twenty-two patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty received combined sciatic plus femoral "3 in 1" blocks as adjuncts to general anaesthesia. Eleven patients received 0.375% bupivacaine 45 ml (168.75 mg) with adrenaline 1 in 200,000 and the remaining 11 received plain solution according to a previously prepared, randomized list. The mean maximum plasma bupivacaine concentration was significantly greater with plain solution than when adrenaline was added (1.66 micrograms ml-1 compared with 0.98 micrograms ml-1) (P less than 0.05). Bupivacaine concentrations were greater at all times in the plain group compared with the group receiving adrenaline. These differences were statistically significant at 10, 15 and 20 min (P less than 0.05). The greatest peak concentration recorded was 3.13 micrograms ml-1 in one patient receiving plain bupivacaine. No patient developed signs of systemic toxic effects. Peak plasma concentrations were related inversely to body weight in patients receiving solution containing adrenaline (P less than 0.005), but no relationship existed in patients who received plain solution.

Influence of the addition of potassium to 0.5% prilocaine solution during I.V. regional anaesthesia.

Six volunteers underwent i.v. regional anaesthesia on two occasions using 0.5% prilocaine 40 ml with potassium 0 or 4 mmol litre-1. Addition of potassium produced more rapid sensory blockade to pinprick at five of the six sites tested, although this was statistically significant at only one site (P less than 0.05) and more rapid sensory blockade to pinch with Allis forceps at four of the six sites (n.s.). Recovery of sensory blockade was rapid and only one site showed any significant effect, pinprick blockade being prolonged by potassium (P less than 0.05), although there was no overall effect. It is suggested that the addition of physiological (extracellular) concentrations of potassium to prilocaine for i.v. regional anaesthesia confers no clinical advantage, but that further study of other agents and sites of blockade is required.

Bupivacaine and prilocaine in intravenous regional anaesthesia.

Six volunteers underwent intravenous regional anaesthesia of the non-dominant arm on four occasions using two equipotent doses of bupivacaine and prilocaine, administered in a randomised double-blind sequence. Equipotent doses produced similar degrees of motor and sensory blockade. Bupivacaine produced more rapid motor power loss and delayed motor recovery (p less than 0.01). Prilocaine produced more prolonged objective blockade following tourniquet release (p less than 0.01), although this was not clinically useful, and bupivacaine led to a marked prolongation of subjective blockade (p less than 0.01). Increase of dose with both drugs gave more rapid and complete sensory and motor blockade and delayed recovery (p less than 0.05). This was, however, associated with more marked toxicity. It is suggested that in intravenous regional anaesthesia there are no clinical differences between the drugs in equipotent solutions, and that the lower concentrations are the appropriate ones for standard use.