ABSTRACT
The Monod equation has been widely applied as the general rate law of microbial growth, but its applications are not always successful. By drawing on the frameworks of kinetic and stoichiometric metabolic models and metabolic control analysis, the modeling reported here simulated the growth kinetics of a methanogenic microorganism and illustrated that different enzymes and metabolites control growth rate to various extents and that their controls peak at either very low, intermediate, or very high substrate concentrations. In comparison, with a single term and two parameters, the Monod equation only approximately accounts for the controls of rate-determining enzymes and metabolites at very high and very low substrate concentrations, but neglects the enzymes and metabolites whose controls are most notable at intermediate concentrations. These findings support a limited link between the Monod equation and methanogen growth, and unify the competing views regarding enzyme roles in shaping growth kinetics. The results also preclude a mechanistic derivation of the Monod equation from methanogen metabolic networks and highlight a fundamental challenge in microbiology: single-term expressions may not be sufficient for accurate prediction of microbial growth. IMPORTANCE The Monod equation has been widely applied to predict the rate of microbial growth, but its application is not always successful. Using a novel metabolic modeling approach, we simulated the growth of a methanogen and uncovered a limited mechanistic link between the Monod equation and the methanogen's metabolic network. Specifically, the equation provides an approximation to the controls by rate-determining metabolites and enzymes at very low and very high substrate concentrations, but it is missing the remaining enzymes and metabolites whose controls are most notable at intermediate concentrations. These results support the Monod equation as a useful approximation of growth rates and highlight a fundamental challenge in microbial kinetics: single-term rate expressions may not be sufficient for accurate prediction of microbial growth.
