The 2-week rule for suspected head and neck cancer in the United Kingdom: referral patterns, diagnostic efficacy of the guidelines and compliance.

A retrospective audit of 1079 2-week referrals between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2006 was undertaken. The aims of this audit were to assess compliance of referrals with Department of Health (DoH) guidelines; the effectiveness of the 2-week referral route in detecting head and neck cancers, and to determine whether this route identified more early stage cancers. Of 1079 2-week referrals, 71.5% conformed to DoH criteria. DoH guidelines were found to have a high sensitivity of 83.9% (75.5-89.7%, 95% CI) for head and neck cancer, but a low positive predictive value of 12.8% (10.5-15.3%) and a specificity of 30.0% (27.2-33.1%). Only 10.9% of 2-week referrals were diagnosed with a head and neck cancer. The cancer detection rate was higher amongst referrals that conformed to DoH guidelines (12.8%) compared to those that did not 6.2%. This was statistically significant (Chi square, p<0.01). The guidelines had a positive likelihood ratio of 1.20 (1.1-1.3), suggesting that there is a minimal increase in the likelihood of head and neck cancer when DoH guidelines are correctly applied. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the DoH referral criteria is 2.21. Most head and neck cancers were diagnosed via routine referral routes, 2-week referrals contributing to only 21.4% of all head and neck cancers diagnosed during the study period. The 2-week referral route did not identify more early stage cancers.

The choice of timing for diuresis renography: the F + 0 method.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a method of diuresis renography where the radiopharmaceutical and frusemide (diuretic) are given simultaneously, in contrast to conventional renography which involves an intravenous injection with frusemide 20 min after administering the radiopharmaceutical (F + 20) or 15 min before (F - 15), with particular interest in the effect of this change on assessing split renal function and interpreting upper tract drainage dynamics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 29 patients (18 women and 11 men, mean age 47 years, range 21--86) were assessed. Each patient had two renograms taken over a 48-h period, either by the F + 20 or F - 15, and the F + 0 method: Data for split renal function and drainage curves were obtained in the usual way. Two independent assessments of the drainage curves were obtained and the results compared. RESULTS: The split function assessments were identical (< 5% variation) in all but two patients; 26 of 29 (90%) gave identical conclusions about the drainage curves. The three patients with discrepancies between the studies had either hugely dilated upper tracts or otherwise had multiple complicating factors, e.g. impaired renal function, neuropathic bladder. CONCLUSIONS: F + 0 renography has been used in paediatric urological practice before, but there are no comparative studies and no data on its use in adults. This prospective study confirmed that in investigating dilated upper tracts, the F + 0 technique gives similar results to the conventional techniques. The F + 0 method has the potential to reduce the time required to undertake standard F + 20 renography but it may not be useful in evaluating the grossly dilated upper tract, where the F-15 technique has the best record in terms of reducing equivocal results.