ABSTRACT
According to federal law, polling places must be accessible to persons with disabilities. The rate of compliance with these laws, however, is not known. Our purpose was to determine whether polling places in the Greater Kansas City area were physically accessible to persons with disabilities. Students, faculty, and staff members from four professional programs representing two universities completed surveys at 128 polling places on the day of the 2004 Presidential election. Over the 14 items of interest, compliance ranged from 75% to 99%. The highest rate of deficiencies was found in the lack of a ramp with a handrail to the entrance of the polling place. Only 43% of the polling places were compliant in all of the 14 survey items. Despite laws mandating that polling places be accessible to persons with disabilities, restrictions in access persist. Persons with disabilities may still find polling places inaccessible on Election Day.
Subject(s)
Architectural Accessibility/standards , Disabled Persons , Politics , Humans , KansasABSTRACT
Restoring hand function is difficult post-stroke. We sought to determine if applying neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) was beneficial for reducing severe hand impairments. Subjects with chronic stroke (N=8; 3 Fe, 5 M; 58.3 +/- 6.9 y/o) received 10 sessions of NMES using two different methods applied in a counterbalanced order. In one intervention, we applied NMES (active) in a novel fashion using multiple stimulators on the forearm flexors and extensors to assist subjects with grasping and releasing a tennis ball. In the other intervention, the NMES ('passive') stimulated repeated wrist extension and flexion. Motor performance was assessed prior to and immediately following the interventions and at retention. Upper extremity (UE) Fugl-Myer scores significantly improved (p < 0.002) immediately following either intervention. Significant improvement was also observed in the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale (MASS) (p < 0.03), immediately following intervention, primarily due to the NMESpassive treatment (p < 0.034). Subjects performed grasping tasks significantly faster (p < 0.0433) following interventions, with performance speeds on dexterous manipulation increasing approximately 10% for NMESactive immediately following intervention, compared to only 0.1% improvement following NMESpassive. Generally, improvements in motor speed remained 10 days following NMESactive intervention, although slightly diminished. In conclusion, severe hand impairment was reduced after a short duration of NMES therapy in this pilot data set for individuals with chronic stroke. NMES-assisted grasping trended towards greater functional benefit than traditional NMES-activation of wrist flexors/extensors.