Inhibition of Hyaluronic Acid Synthesis Decreases Endometrial Cell Attachment, Migration, and Invasion.

To characterize the effects of 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) on expression of the hyaluronic acid (HA) system and on attachment, migration, and invasion of endometrial epithelial (EECs) and stroma cells (ESCs) to peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMCs), this in vitro study was performed in an Academic Center. De-identified endometrial tissue samples used were from reproductive-aged women. EECs and ESCs isolated from menstrual endometrial biopsies were treated with 4-MU or vehicle. Real-time polymerase chain reaction and western blot were used to assess expression of HA synthases (HAS), hyaluronidase, and standard CD44. Established in vitro assays were used to assess attachment, migration, and invasion with and without treatment with 4-MU. Chi square and Student's t-test were used to analyze the results as appropriate. The addition of 4-MU decreased mRNA and protein expression of HAS 2, HAS 3, and CD44 in EECs and ESCs compared to control. Treatment with 4-MU also decreased attachment, migration, and invasion of EECs and ESCs to PMCs compared to control. 4-MU decreases endometrial cell adhesion, migration, and invasion to PMCs. This effect appears to be mediated by a decrease in HAS 2, HAS 3, and CD44. 4-MU is a potential treatment for endometriosis. Future in vivo studies are needed to evaluate 4-MU as a therapeutic agent for endometriosis.

CD44 variant 6 is involved in the attachment and invasion of endometrial cells to peritoneum.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of CD44 standard (CD44s), CD44v3, and CD44v6 overexpression (OE) on immortalized human endometrial epithelial (iEECs) and stroma cells (human endometrial stromal cells [hESCs]) using in vitro assays and a nude mouse xenograft model. Menstrual endometrial cells from women with endometriosis have increased adhesion and also express higher levels of CD44 variant 6 (v6), but not v3, compared to menstrual endometrial cells from women without endometriosis. DESIGN: In vitro studies and in vivo xenograft model. SETTING: Academic center. PATIENTS(S): Deidentified immortalized endometrial epithelial tissue samples of a reproductive-age woman. INTERVENTION(S): Overexpression of CD44s, CD44v3, and CD44v6 was carried out using lipofectamine, and their expression was verified with mRNA and protein in iEEC and hESCs. The OE cells were used in in vitro studies and an in vivo xenograft model compared to plasmid control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The effect of CD44s, CD44v3, and CD44v6 OE on attachment and invasion assays and a xenograft model with immortalized human stromal and epithelial cells. RESULT(S): Expression of mRNA and protein confirmed appropriate OE of CD44s, CD44v3, and CD44v6 in the different cell types. CD44v6 OE increased attachment of hESCs compared with controls. CD44v6 OE did not change the attachment of iEECs. There was no difference in attachment in iEECs or hESCs with OE of CD44s or CD44v3. CONCLUSION(S): Overexpression of CD44v6 increases attachment of hESCs to peritoneal mesothelial cells in an in vitro assay and an in vivo xenograft model. Menstrual endometrial cell type and CD44 variants play a complex role in the development of the early endometriotic lesion.

Does assisted hatching affect live birth in fresh, first cycle in vitro fertilization in good and poor prognosis patients?

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of assisted hatching (AH) on live birth rate (LBR) in first cycle, fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) in good and poor prognosis patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort using cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System. Live birth rate was compared in women who underwent first cycle, autologous, fresh IVF cycles with (n = 48,858) and without (n = 103,413) AH from 2007 to 2015. RESULTS: The propensity-weighted LBR was 39.2% with AH versus 43.9% without AH in all patients. The rate difference (RD) with AH was - 4.7% ([CI - 0.053, - 0.040], P < 0.001) with the calculated number needed to harm being 22. AH affected live birth in both good prognosis and poor prognosis patients. The propensity-weighted monozygotic twinning (MZT) rate was 2.3% in patients treated with AH as compared to 1.2% patients that did not receive AH. The RD with AH on MZT in fresh, first IVF cycles was 1.1% ([0.008, 0.014], P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AH may affect LBR across all patients and in poor prognosis patients in fresh IVF cycles. Caution should be exercised when applying this technology. More prospective research is needed.

Prewash total motile count is a poor predictor of live birth in intrauterine insemination cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a relationship between prewash total motile count and live births in couples undergoing IUI. DESIGN: Retrospective review in a single academic center. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Couples with infertility undergoing ovulation induction with IUI between 2010 and 2014. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live births. RESULT(S): Our cohort included 310 women who underwent 655 IUI cycles with a cumulative live birth rate (LBR) per couple of 20% and an LBR per cycle of 10%. A analysis yielded no correlation between prewash total motile count (TMC) and live births. No live births occurred with TMC <2 million sperms. Age had a significant negative relationship to LBR. A receiver operating characteristic analysis comparing age and live births indicated a significant decline in live births for women >37 years (90% sensitivity, 70% specificity). The LBR per couple was decreased to 7% in women >37 years compared with 25% in women <37 years. CONCLUSION(S): Prewash TMC is a poor predictor of live birth. There were no live births with prewash TMC <2 million sperms. The LBR for women >37 years with IUI was significantly lower than women <37 years.

The Hyaluronic Acid System is Intact in Menstrual Endometrial Cells in Women With and Without Endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the production and degradation of hyaluronic acid (HA) in menstrual endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) and endometrial stromal cells (ESCs) in women with and without endometriosis. To identify the presence of CD44, the primary receptor of HA, in menstrual EECs and ESCs in women with and without endometriosis. DESIGN: In vitro study. SETTING: Academic center. PATIENT(S): Deidentified patient samples from women with and without endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS: EECs and ESCs were isolated from menstrual endometrial biopsies performed on women with (N = 9) and without (N = 11) endometriosis confirmed by laparoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry were used to assess hyaluronic acid synthase (HAS) isoforms 1, 2, and 3; hyaluronidase (HYAL) isoforms 1 and 2; and standard CD44. Student t test was used to analyze the results. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in messenger RNA (mRNA) or protein expression of HAS2, HAS3, HYAL1, or HYAL2 in EECs or ESCs from women with or without endometriosis. HAS1 mRNA was variably detected, whereas HAS1 protein was similarly expressed in EECs and ESCs from women with and without endometriosis. Standard CD44 was expressed in both cell types, and expression did not differ in cells from women with or without endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS: The HA system is expressed in eutopic menstrual ESCs and EECs from women with and without endometriosis. There are no differences in expression in HA production or degradation enzymes in EECs or ESCs from women with and without endometriosis. Standard CD44 expression does not differ in eutopic menstrual endometrial cells from women with and without endometriosis.