Implementation of Incidental Liver Lesion Clinically Integrated Workflow Increases Compliance With ACR Follow-Up Guidelines, Closing Care Gaps.

OBJECTIVE: Follow established management guidelines from the ACR and improve adherence to follow-up recommendations for incidental liver lesions (ILLs) for all patients undergoing CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast (CTAPw) examinations, with advocacy from a multidisciplinary care team. METHODS: A mandatory structured radiology reporting module was developed for use in CTAPw reports for ILL recommendations. Data from the electronic medical record describing patients with radiology-reported ILLs and their clinical risk diagnosis categories were tabulated in a queryable electronic database. A nurse co-ordinator initiated workflow to communicate the need for ILL follow-up MRI to ordering physicians and primary care providers. MRIs were ordered by the ILL team. An interactive process was undertaken with continuous review to improve identification of eligible patients and adherence to recommendations. RESULTS: During the initial launch phase from December 2020 to March 2021, 1,577 ILLs were detected on 20,667 CTAPw examinations, and for those with the characterize now recommendation, 36 of 114 (31.6%) received follow-up in 30 days. Between January 2021 and June 2022, 117,520 CTAPws were performed and 4,371 ILLs were detected. Using the ILL workflow, in the MRI now cohort, follow-up occurred within 30 days in 202 of 542 (36.2%) patients, and a total of 368 of 542 (67.9%) patients have completed their follow-up to date. DISCUSSION: Using a focused effort to close a gap in ILL care, adherence to follow-up recommendations improved over the long term, although there remains a gap in adherence to short-term interventions. A multidisciplinary approach, radiology reporting, and software solutions were leveraged to improve a complex process.

Intracranial hypotension: improved MRI detection with diagnostic intracranial angles.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial hypotension is an uncommon cause of headaches that is often misdiagnosed. The classic MRI features of intracranial hypotension can be variable and subjective. The purpose of this study was to provide objective criteria in the MRI evaluation of intracranial hypotension by quantifying normal values for the pontomesencephalic angle, mamillopontine distance, and lateral ventricular angle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with the clinical diagnosis of intracranial hypotension and a control group was performed with measurements of the pontomesencephalic angle, mamillopontine distance, and lateral ventricular angle. Qualitative evaluation of other MRI findings included dural enhancement, venous engorgement, subdural collections, brainstem slumping, and tonsillar herniation. RESULTS: In 29 patients with intracranial hypotension, the mean pontomesencephalic angle, mamillopontine distance, and lateral ventricular angle were 41.2° (SD, ± 17.4°), 4.4 mm (SD, ± 1.8), and 130.1° (SD, ± 9.8°), respectively. In the control group, the mean pontomesencephalic angle, mamillopontine distance, and lateral ventricular angle were 65° (SD, ± 9.9°), 7.0 mm (SD, ± 1.3), and 132.2° (SD, ± 5.7°), respectively. The differences in the pontomesencephalic angle and mamillopontine distance values for the intracranial hypotension group versus the control group were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The difference in the lateral ventricular angle measurements was not statistically significant (p = 0.37). Cutoff points of a 5.5-mm mamillopontine distance and 50° pontomesencephalic angle were estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves. CONCLUSION: In patients with the clinical suspicion of intracranial hypotension, we found that cutoff values of 5.5 mm or less for the mamillopontine distance and 50° or less for the pontomesencephalic angle were sensitive and specific in strengthening the qualitative MRI findings. Therefore, quantitative assessments may provide a more accurate diagnosis.

Assessing the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of gravid patients at risk for placenta accreta.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of placenta accreta remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incremental benefit of MRI after ultrasound (US) for a large cohort of gravid patients at risk for a placenta accreta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of outcomes in women with risk factors for a placenta accreta between November 1995 and February 2008 was performed. Inclusion criteria were high-risk women with abnormal placenta implantation on US or operative diagnosis of placenta accreta, with or without a prenatal MRI. Delivery mode, diagnosis, and transfusion requirements were compared. RESULTS: Ranging in age from 19 to 43 years, with zero to five prior cesarean sections, 139 women met inclusion criteria. The MRI was performed in 28.7% (40/139). US, MRI, and operative diagnoses were highly correlated (P < .001). Women who underwent both US and MRI were more likely to deliver by cesarean hysterectomy (P < .001). When the cohort is stratified by outcome diagnosis (normal, previa, accreta), no difference in delivery mode is found; regardless of whether subjects were imaged by US alone or US and MRI. Transfusion requirements were highest in the US and MRI group (mean of 3.9 units vs. 0.9 units in the US only group, P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study fails to demonstrate that the incremental use of MRI for placenta accreta changes delivery mode in stratified analysis. Patients who underwent both US and MRI were most likely to have a cesarean hysterectomy delivery, and required more blood products, suggesting that undergoing tests may be indicative of an abnormal and at risk patient population.