ABSTRACT
Hypochondriacal concerns ranging from disease phobias to bodily preoccupations are common among patients with panic disorder. In a previous study of patients with panic disorder, we found that, of a number of symptom dimensions examined, anxiety sensitivity was the strongest predictor of hypochondriacal concerns. This finding has been the topic of subsequent debate in the anxiety literature, with concerns raised whether true hypochondriacal concerns were confounded with typical panic-related concerns. To clarify this issue, we now report on the association between anxiety sensitivity and hypochondriacal concerns in 100 patients with major depression and no history of panic disorder. Consistent with our previous study, we found that of the symptoms examined--anxiety sensitivity, depressed mood, anxious mood, somatic symptoms, and anger/hostility--anxiety sensitivity was the strongest predictor of hypochondriacal concerns. Findings are discussed in relation to the role of catastrophic interpretations of somatic symptoms in depression, panic disorder, and hypochondriasis.
Subject(s)
Anxiety , Depressive Disorder , Fear , Hypochondriasis , Adult , Anxiety/complications , Anxiety/psychology , Attitude to Health , Cohort Studies , Depressive Disorder/complications , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Disease Susceptibility , Female , Humans , Hypochondriasis/complications , Hypochondriasis/psychology , Male , Regression Analysis , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Increasing attention has been directed in recent years to the detection and treatment of psychiatric co-morbidity among depressed individuals. The overlap of social phobia (SP) and avoidant personality disorder (APD) has been well recognized and a relationship between these disorders and depression has been suggested. METHODS: The pattern and clinical implications of co-morbidity of SP and APD with major depressive disorder (MDD), diagnosed by DSM-III-R criteria, were studied among 243 out-patients presenting with depression. RESULTS: Overall, 26.7% of adults in our sample with MDD met criteria for SP and 28.4% for APD. Almost two-thirds of depressed adults meeting criteria for social phobia or avoidant personality disorder met criteria for both (SP+APD). Depressed adults who met criteria for both SP+APD exhibited a significantly higher proportion of atypical depression (54.8%) compared with those with neither SP nor APD (31.1%). Among depressed patients, the co-occurrence of SP with APD was also associated with an earlier age of onset of MDD, a greater number of comorbid Axis I diagnoses, and greater impairment of social adjustment and assertiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm the overlap of SP and APD in a depressed population and the high prevalence of these disorders in MDD. They suggest that depressed individuals with both SP and APD but not SP alone are at particularly high risk for atypical depression and for social dysfunction in excess of that caused by a current major depression.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Personality Disorders/epidemiology , Phobic Disorders/epidemiology , Social Behavior Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Social AdjustmentABSTRACT
The relationship between hypochondriacal concerns, as assessed by the Illness Attitude Scales, and depressive symptoms was examined in a sample of 100 drug-free outpatients with major depressive disorder. These patients were treated with fluoxetine for 8 weeks, and the effect of treatment on hypochondriacal symptoms was examined. All patients were administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Symptom Questionnaire, and the Personality Disorders Questionnaire-Revised. We found little relationship between severity of depressive symptoms and hypochondriacal concerns. Measures of anxiety, somatic symptoms, and psychological distress were more consistently related to these concerns. Similarly, patients with either histrionic personality disorder or a lifetime history of panic disorder had greater hypochondriacal concerns than patients without these diagnoses. After open treatment with fluoxetine, the degree of hypochondriacal concerns showed statistically significant decreases, which were only partly related to the degree of change in depression and anxiety severity. Our findings suggest that the presence of hypochondriacal concerns among depressed outpatients is more closely related to the presence of anxiety than depressive symptoms. The relatively small impact of an acute course of antidepressant treatment on hypochondriacal concerns in our sample suggests that these concerns may be enduring characteristics modulated only to a limited extent by short term pharmacological alterations of affective state.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Hypochondriasis/diagnosis , Sick Role , Adult , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Histrionic Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Histrionic Personality Disorder/drug therapy , Histrionic Personality Disorder/psychology , Humans , Hypochondriasis/drug therapy , Hypochondriasis/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Panic Disorder/diagnosis , Panic Disorder/drug therapy , Panic Disorder/psychology , Patient Dropouts/psychology , Personality Inventory , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/drug therapy , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the proportion of patients who show no response to a fixed dose of fluoxetine after 2, 4, and 6 weeks of treatment and then respond by week 8. METHOD: In an open trial, 143 outpatients who met DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder were treated with a regimen of fluoxetine, 20 mg/day. The authors analyzed the proportion of patients who had less than a 20% decrease from baseline in their scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression after 2, 4, and 6 weeks and who went on to have a 50% or greater reduction by week 8. A last-observation-carried-forward strategy was used to calculate conditional probabilities of 8-week response. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate probabilities of response at week 8 given degrees of response at week 2. RESULTS: Eighty-two subjects (57.3%) who started the trial responded by week 8. Of those subjects who showed no improvement at weeks 2, 4, and 6, the proportions of responders at week 8 were 36.4%, 18.9%, and 6.5%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 8-week response given nonresponse at week 2 was 0.45. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with no response to antidepressant treatment by 4 or 6 weeks who responded by week 8 was substantially less than that for subjects who had at least a partial response. Nonresponse as early as week 2 predicted 8-week outcome.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Adult , Ambulatory Care , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fluoxetine/administration & dosage , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Probability , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
One hundred forty-eight patients, ages 18-65, with major depression were administered the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) prior to 8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine; 75 of these patients were readministered the MMSE following treatment. MMSE scores were not related to pretreatment severity of depression or to reported concentration problems and were not predictive of antidepressant response. Non- and partial responders had lower posttreatment MMSE scores than responders, men had lower posttreatment scores than women, and subjects over 50 had lower pretreatment scores than younger subjects, although in all cases, the magnitude of the differences was small and unlikely to be clinically important. Our results suggest that while the MMSE has been shown to be useful among geriatric and other depressed inpatients, it is not a sensitive indicator of depression severity, concentration problems, or likelihood of treatment response among otherwise healthy adults with major depression in an outpatient setting.