ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the mortality rate of patients treated with gastroschisis at a Jamaican pediatric hospital, and to identify factors that contribute significantly to mortality. METHODS: Eighty-five patients were treated with gastroschisis between November 1, 2006 and November 30, 2015. Of these, 80 records were recovered and reviewed retrospectively. Records were analyzed for maternal and patient characteristics, and details of the clinical course. Death during admission was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: 63 of the 80 patients died during admission, giving a mortality rate of 78.8%. Sepsis was the main cause of death (82.4%). 27 patients (33.8%) had complicated gastroschisis (necrosis, perforation and/or atresia), all of whom died. Only preterm gestational age, complicated gastroschisis, and the lack of parenteral nutrition were found to be statistically associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION: Our mortality rate is higher than those quoted in high-income countries, and correlates to those found in low- to middle-income countries. Mortality in our cohort was significantly associated with prematurity, complicated gastroschisis, and the lack of parenteral nutrition. Efforts to improve outcome must focus on improving antenatal care, establishing transfer protocols, and optimizing nutrition for all patients with gastroschisis. STUDY TYPE: Prognostic/Retrospective Study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Subject(s)
Gastroschisis/mortality , Parenteral Nutrition , Adult , Female , Gastroschisis/surgery , Gastroschisis/therapy , Gestational Age , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infant, Premature, Diseases/mortality , Infant, Premature, Diseases/surgery , Infant, Premature, Diseases/therapy , Jamaica/epidemiology , Male , Mothers , Parenteral Nutrition, Total , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sepsis/complications , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the Jamaica road traffic act mandates motorcycle riders to wear approved helmets, opponents suggest that the local road conditions obviate any benefits from helmet use that have been proven in Developed countries. They suggest that the narrow, winding, poorly surfaced, congested local highways do not allow motorcyclists to sustain high velocity travel. The accidents then tend to occur at lower speeds and are accompanied by less severe injuries. This study was carried out to determine the impact of helmet use on traumatic brain injuries from motorcycle collisions in patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital in Jamaica. METHODS: A prospectively collected trauma registry maintained by the Department of Surgery at the University Hospital of the West Indies in Jamaica was accessed to identify all motorcycle collision victims from January 2000 to January 2007. The therapeutic outcomes of traumatic brain injuries were compared between helmeted and un-helmeted riders. The data was analyzed using SPSS Version 12. RESULTS: Of 293 motorcycle collision victims, 143 sustained brain injuries. There were 9 females (6.3%) with an average age of 23 +/- 7.3 years and 134 males (93.7%) at an average age of 33.4 +/- 11.2 years (mean +/- SD). Only 49 (34.3%) patients wore a helmet at the time of a collision. Helmet use at the time of a collision significantly reduced the severity of head injuries (28.6% vs 46.8%, P = 0.028) and the likelihood of sustaining intra-cranial lesions (26.5% vs 44.7%, P = 0.03) from head injuries. CONCLUSION: Wearing a helmet at the time of a motorcycle collision reduces the severity of head injuries. However, the prevalence of helmet use at the time of a collision is unacceptably low.
