Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 92(8): 1151-1157, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31270593

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Outdoor workers are exposed daily to solar ultraviolet radiation, an important contributor in the development of non-melanoma skin cancer. This study aimed to quantify the health burden of non-melanoma skin cancers among outdoor workers in Canada. METHODS: Solar ultraviolet radiation exposure and estimates of exposure levels were applied to employment information from Canada census data to determine the exposed population in the risk exposure period (1961-2001). Risk estimates were drawn from meta-analyses selected based on quality and relevance to the current study. Population-attributable fractions were calculated using Levin's equation and attributable cases were estimated based on incidence data reported by the Canadian Cancer Society. RESULTS: In 2011, 6.31% (4556 cases) of non-melanoma skin cancer cases were estimated to be attributable to occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation. The majority of these cases occurred in men in the agriculture or construction industries. CONCLUSIONS: These estimates of the burden of non-melanoma skin cancer in Canada identify the need for further prevention efforts, particularly in agriculture and construction. Introducing workplace sun safety measures could be an important area for policy development.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Sunlight/adverse effects , Adult , Canada/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Workplace
2.
Occup Environ Med ; 72(6): 413-20, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25713157

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify work-related fatal and non-fatal hospitalised injuries using multiple data sources, (2) to compare case-ascertainment from external data sources with accepted workers' compensation claims and (3) to investigate the characteristics of work-related fatal and hospitalised injuries not captured by workers' compensation. METHODS: Work-related fatal injuries were ascertained from vital statistics, coroners and hospital discharge databases using payment and diagnosis codes and injury and work descriptions; and work-related (non-fatal) injuries were ascertained from the hospital discharge database using admission, diagnosis and payment codes. Injuries for British Columbia residents aged 15-64 years from 1991 to 2009 ascertained from the above external data sources were compared to accepted workers' compensation claims using per cent captured, validity analyses and logistic regression. RESULTS: The majority of work-related fatal injuries identified in the coroners data (83%) and the majority of work-related hospitalised injuries (95%) were captured as an accepted workers' compensation claim. A work-related coroner report was a positive predictor (88%), and the responsibility of payment field in the hospital discharge record a sensitive indicator (94%), for a workers' compensation claim. Injuries not captured by workers' compensation were associated with female gender, type of work (natural resources and other unspecified work) and injury diagnosis (eg, airway-related, dislocations and undetermined/unknown injury). CONCLUSIONS: Some work-related injuries captured by external data sources were not found in workers' compensation data in British Columbia. This may be the result of capturing injuries or workers that are ineligible for workers' compensation, or the result of injuries that go unreported to the compensation system. Hospital discharge records and coroner reports may provide opportunities to identify workers (or family members) with an unreported work-related injury and to provide them with information for submitting a workers' compensation claim.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , British Columbia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Young Adult
3.
Chronic Dis Inj Can ; 33(2): 88-94, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23470174

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Population-based health databases were used for the surveillance of asthma among workers in British Columbia for the period 1999 to 2003. The purpose was to identify high-risk groups of workers with asthma for further investigation, education and prevention. METHODS: Workers were identified using an employer-paid health premium field in the provincial health registry, and were linked to their physician visit, hospitalization, workers' compensation and pharmaceutical records; asthma cases were defined by the presence of an asthma diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9-493) in these health records. Workers were assigned to an ''at-risk'' exposure group based on their industry of employment. RESULTS: For males, significantly higher asthma rates were observed for workers in the Utilities, Transport/Warehousing, Wood and Paper Manufacturing (Sawmills), Health Care/Social Assistance and Education industries. For females, significantly higher rates were found for those working in the Waste Management/Remediation and Health Care/Social Assistance industries. CONCLUSION: The data confirm a high prevalence of active asthma in the working population of British Columbia, and in particular, higher rates among females compared to males and in industries with known respiratory sensitizers such as dust and chemical exposures.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Industry/classification , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/etiology , Asthma/prevention & control , British Columbia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Industry/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medical Records, Problem-Oriented/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/classification , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Population Surveillance , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Vital Statistics , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data
4.
Occup Environ Med ; 66(11): 766-71, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19528044

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the use of multiple health data sources for population-based asbestosis surveillance in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: Provincial health insurance registration records, workers' compensation records, hospitalisation records, and outpatient medical service records were linked using individual-specific study identifiers. The study population was restricted to individuals > or = 15 years of age living in the province during 1992-2004. RESULTS: 1170 new asbestosis cases were identified from 1992 to 2004 for an overall incidence rate of 2.82 (men: 5.48, women: 0.23) per 100,000 population; 96% of cases were male and average (SD) age was 69 (10) years. Although the annual number of new cases increased by 30% during the surveillance period (beta = 2.36, p = 0.019), the observed increase in annual incidence rates was not significant (beta = 0.02, p = 0.398). Workers' compensation, hospitalisation and outpatient databases identified 23%, 48% and 50% of the total new cases, respectively. Of the new cases, 82% were identified through single data sources, 10% were only recorded in the workers' compensation records, and 36% only in each of the hospitalisation and outpatient records. 84% of hospitalisation cases and 83% of outpatient cases were not included in the workers' compensation records. The three data sources showed different temporal trends in the annual number of new cases and annual incidence rates. CONCLUSIONS: Single data sources were not sufficient to identify all new cases, thus leading to serious underestimations of the true burden of asbestosis. Integrating multiple health data sources could provide a more complete picture in population-based surveillance of asbestosis and other occupational diseases.


Subject(s)
Asbestosis/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , British Columbia/epidemiology , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Industry/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...