"Governed by the pain": narratives of fibromyalgia.

PURPOSE: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic syndrome characterized by pain and fatigue. The aim of this study was to explore how individuals with FM make sense of the illness experience and integrate it into their personal biographies. METHOD: Ten women from a pain management service in the north west of England were interviewed for the study. A chronological summary of each life story was produced and narrative features such as plot, tone, imagery and metaphors were identified and compared. RESULTS: Findings are presented in the form of a meta-narrative incorporating all 10 narratives over five phases: (1) making sense of FM: when I was younger, I didn't have any problems at all; (2) onset and diagnosis: you just feel like you're constantly complaining; (3) invasion of FM: you're just trapped; trapped in this body; (4) coping with FM: you try to do things in a pattern it will obey and (5) ongoing struggle: I refuse to give in to it. CONCLUSIONS: The narrative is characterized by a lack of movement and resolution, with participants engaged in an enduring struggle against the challenges of FM. Psychological approaches that facilitate this ongoing adjustment process may prove beneficial in FM treatment and rehabilitation.

The potential benefits of applying a narrative analytic approach for understanding the experience of fibromyalgia: a review.

PURPOSE: People with fibromyalgia (FM), a medically unexplained illness, habitually experience widespread pain and fatigue. While some qualitative research has aimed to understand the experiences of people with FM, studies from a specific narrative perspective are particularly lacking. This review argues that future research could be significantly enhanced by studies which analyse the narratives of people with FM. METHOD: This argument is made through reference to an examination of the extant qualitative literature on the experience of FM and theories and narrative studies on chronic illnesses and identity. RESULTS: The empirical literature is reviewed from a narrative perspective; this assumes that the stories people tell reveal much about their identities and social worlds. As such, it is proposed that narrative analysis is particularly well suited for exploring issues of self and culture and for appreciating how meanings evolve over time. Further, it is also argued that consideration of these issues is particularly relevant for understanding the experience of FM given the enigmatic nature of the syndrome and its chronic course. CONCLUSIONS: The review concludes by emphasizing that narrative analysis is a valuable method which offers the potential for uncovering novel insights about the illness experience for these individuals.

Graduate mental health worker case management of depression in UK primary care: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Based on data from large multicentre US trials, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is advocating a stepped-care model for the management of depression, with 'case management' or 'collaborative care' for selected patients in primary care. AIM: To conduct a pilot study examining the use of graduate mental health workers case managing depressed primary care NHS patients. DESIGN OF STUDY: A randomised controlled trial comparing usual GP care with or without case management over 16 weeks of acute antidepressant drug treatment. SETTING: Three primary care practices in the North East of England. METHOD: Patients with depression, aged 18-65 years, who had failed to adequately respond to antidepressant treatment, were randomised to the two treatments. Assessments were made at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks using a combination of observer and self ratings. RESULTS: Randomisation of 62 patients required screening of 1073 potential patients. There was little difference in outcome between the two treatment arms but a gradual improvement in symptoms over time was seen. Client satisfaction was assessed as high across both treatments. CONCLUSION: While this pilot study confirmed the integrity of the study protocol and the suitability of the outcome measures and randomisation procedure, it raises questions regarding the practicality of recruitment and feasibility of the intervention. It would be crucial to address these issues prior to the implementation of a large multi-centre randomised controlled trial.