ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the use of albuterol by nebulization enhances physiologic or clinical recovery in hospitalized infants with moderate bronchiolitis. METHODS: This prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was performed from December 1995 to March 1996. A total of 52 patients <24 months of age with a diagnosis of moderately severe, acute viral bronchiolitis were enrolled and assigned to receive nebulized albuterol or normal saline placebo for 72 hours under a standardized protocol. Primary outcome measures included improvement in oxygen saturation (SaO2) during hospitalization and survival analysis to assess the time required to reach preestablished discharge criteria on three measures: SaO2, accessory muscle use, and wheezing. An additional secondary outcome measure was actual length of hospital stay. Adverse outcomes also were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean SaO2 between albuterol and placebo at baseline, 24 hours, or maximum SaO2 achieved during hospitalization. Both groups showed significant improvement in oxygen saturation over time, but there was no significant difference in improvement between the two groups. The study had a power of 90% to detect a difference in mean percentage point improvement of 2% SaO2. There was no difference in time to reach discharge criteria as defined by SaO2, accessory muscle use, or wheezing. There was no difference in length of hospital stay or in the frequency of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized albuterol therapy does not appear to enhance recovery or attenuate severity of illness in infants hospitalized with acute, moderate bronchiolitis, as evidenced by improvement in oxygen saturation, time to meet standardized discharge criteria, or length of hospital stay.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Agonists/therapeutic use , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Bronchiolitis/drug therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchiolitis/blood , Double-Blind Method , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay , Male , Oxygen/blood , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Sounds/drug effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether parental errors in dosing liquid medication can be decreased through education. DESIGN: Randomized convenience sample stratified to three study groups. SETTING: General pediatric clinic, largely indigent and Latino. PATIENTS: A total of 45 English-speaking and 45 Spanish-speaking children diagnosed with otitis media and treated with an antibiotic suspension. INTERVENTION: Group 1 patients received the prescription and verbal instructions. Group 2 patients received the prescription and a syringe, then the correct dose was demonstrated. Group 3 patients received the prescription, a syringe with a line marked at the correct dose, and a demonstration. After returning from the pharmacy, parents administered the medication under observation. Parents in group 1 used a dispensing device similar to that planned for home use. The other groups used the syringe. After observation but before discharge, everyone received a syringe with a line marked at the correct dose. Patients were seen again at approximately 1 month, and parents demonstrated how much medication they had administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percent of parents who administered the correct dose. RESULTS: Patients in group 1 received between 32% and 147% of the correct dose, with only 11 of 30 (37%) receiving the correct dose (+/-0.2 mL). In group 2, 25 of 30 (83%) parents administered the correct dose, and in group 3, 30 of 30 (100%) gave the correct dose. Simultaneous logistic regression indicated that accuracy of dosage differed across instructional groups and language. At follow-up, 23 of 26 parents demonstrated the correct dose. CONCLUSION: Education can decrease medication dosing errors made by both Spanish-speaking and English-speaking parents. Effectiveness was also shown at follow-up.