Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (9): CD005303, 2012 Sep 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22972084

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary aspiration of food and fluid is commonly seen in children with feeding and swallowing difficulties associated with a range of diseases and complex medical conditions. Respiratory sequelae and pneumonia are known to be associated with primary aspiration of ingested material, however causality between primary aspiration of specific food and fluid types and pulmonary effects in children is yet to be established in controlled trials. The relative pulmonary morbidity of aspiration of ingested food and fluid materials versus other causes of respiratory disease such as viral and bacterial causes, secondary aspiration of gastrointestinal contents and predisposing lung conditions such as chronic neonatal lung disease in a developing immune system is also unclear. Current management decisions for children who aspirate have to optimise oral nutrition and hydration, while reducing the risk of aspiration to preserve pulmonary integrity. This generally includes restricting aspirated food or fluids and providing texture-modified diets and thickened fluids. Young children frequently refuse thickened fluids providing a management dilemma for both families and health professionals. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of restriction of oral water ingestion on the pulmonary status of children with thin fluid aspiration demonstrated on a modified barium swallow study. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Airways Collaborative Review Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched by the Cochrane Airways Group. The latest search was performed in May 2102. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials comparing restriction of oral intake of water with unlimited oral water ingestion were eligible to be included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Results of searches were reviewed against a pre-determined criteria for inclusion. No eligible trials were identified for a paediatric population and thus no data were available for analysis. One trial in an adult population was identified and reported. MAIN RESULTS: No randomised controlled trials examining the efficacy of restriction of oral intake of water in the management of children with thin fluid aspiration were found. In a single study in an adult population with stroke, no significant differences were seen between a control group of oral water restriction and the experimental group of unlimited oral water ingestion on outcomes such as pneumonia, total oral fluid intake and dehydration. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are no trials that have adequately evaluated the pulmonary effects of allowing or restricting oral water ingestion in children known to have primary aspiration of thin fluids. Thus, there is currently an absence of evidence to support a strict approach of full restriction of oral intake of water or support a more liberal approach of allowing oral water ingestion in children with primary aspiration of thin fluids.


Subject(s)
Drinking Water/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Aspiration/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant
2.
Chest ; 140(3): 589-597, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21436244

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited information exists about the nature of and factors associated with oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA) and silent aspiration (SA) in children. A prospective study was undertaken to determine the factors associated with fluoroscopically identified OPA and SA. METHODS: Three hundred children presenting with feeding difficulties underwent a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) for evaluation of swallowing. Swallowing performance on each food and fluid consistency was rated using the penetration-aspiration scale, and children were classified into the following groups: OPA, SA, overt aspiration (OA), and no aspiration (NA). RESULTS: OPA occurred in 34% of children; of these, 81% had SA. SA was significantly associated with neurologic impairment (OR, 4.65; 95% CI, 2.26-9.54), developmental delay (OR, 4.62; 95% CI, 2.28-9.35), aspiration lung disease (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.29-8.05), and enteral feeding (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.04-3.62). Similar results were found for OPA. Children with SA were more likely to have neurologic disease (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.1-15.8) than those with OA. Age or gender differences, gastroesophageal reflux disease, recurrent respiratory tract infections, and asthma were no more likely to occur in children with OPA, SA, or OA. CONCLUSIONS: SA is very common in children with feeding difficulties and is most likely to occur in children with a neurologic problem. Limited medical diagnoses distinguished between aspirators (OPA, SA) and those with NA. VFSS should be performed in children with feeding difficulties and diagnoses of neurologic impairment, cerebral palsy, aspiration lung disease, and/or enteral feeding because of the increased likelihood of SA.


Subject(s)
Inhalation , Adolescent , Cerebral Palsy/complications , Cerebral Palsy/physiopathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Developmental Disabilities/complications , Developmental Disabilities/physiopathology , Female , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Infant , Lung Diseases/complications , Lung Diseases/physiopathology , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Pneumonia, Aspiration/complications , Pneumonia, Aspiration/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Video Recording , Young Adult
3.
Early Hum Dev ; 84(10): 637-43, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18515021

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many preterm neonates display difficulty establishing suck-feeding competence in the weeks following birth. Ineffective management of transitional feeding issues may cause patient complications, and can contribute to increased length of stay. AIMS: Given that many neonatal nurseries appear to vary in their neonatal feeding management practices, the aim of this study was to investigate and document the routine level of support and intervention currently provided for preterm neonates with transitional feeding issues across the various level II (special care) nurseries (SCNs) in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all Queensland SCNs in 2005 (n=36). The questionnaire contained a series of closed-choice and short-answer questions designed to obtain information from each SCN regarding their current practices for managing transitional feeding issues in preterm neonates. Results were confirmed during a follow-up phone call. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 29 SCNs (80.6%). None of these nurseries reported having any formal, written policies regarding the management of transitional feeding issues in preterm neonates. Wide variations were reported in relation to the suck-feeding assessments and interventions used by staff within the various SCNs. Of the 29 nurseries, 4 (13.8%) reported using checklists or assessments to judge readiness for suck-feeds, and 5 (17.2%) reported using pulse oximetry to judge tolerance of suck-feeding attempts. Eighteen SCNs (62.1%) reported offering some form of active intervention to assist neonates with transitional feeding issues, with the most common intervention techniques reported being non-nutritive sucking during tube feeds, pre-feeding oral stimulation, and actively pacing suck-feeds. Twenty-two SCNs (75.4%) reported having access to a lactation consultant to assist mothers with breastfeeding issues. CONCLUSIONS: Differences were reported in the routine management of transitional feeding issues in preterm neonates across the various SCNs in Queensland. It is suggested that evidence based guidelines need to be developed, and that, in order to do this, further research studies are required to determine current best practice, as well as to answer remaining questions.


Subject(s)
Infant Nutrition Disorders/therapy , Infant, Premature , Australia , Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Enteral Nutrition/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature/growth & development , Infant, Premature/physiology , Nurse Administrators , Sucking Behavior/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
4.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 42(11): 1024-31, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17893917

ABSTRACT

Oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA) of food and fluids is known to be associated with pneumonia in dysphagic children with neurological disease and direct causality is often assumed. However, little is known about the relationship between OPA and pneumonia in medically complex children when other possible risk factors for pneumonia are considered. We examined the association of World Health Organization (WHO)-defined pneumonia in a heterogeneous group of children with swallowing dysfunction identified by a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS). A retrospective chart review of 150 children (aged 2 weeks to 20 years) was undertaken to determine the relationship between pneumonia and (i) type of swallowing dysfunction (including OPA), (ii) consistency of aspirated food/fluid, and (iii) other factors including multisystem involvement and age (1 year). In univariate analysis, the odds ratio (OR) for pneumonia was significantly increased in children with post-swallow residue (PSR) (OR 2.5) or aspiration on thin fluids (OR 2.4), but not with aspiration of thick fluids or purees. In multi-logistic regression, type of swallowing dysfunction or aspirated food/fluid were no longer significant. Instead, pneumonia was significantly associated with diagnosis of asthma (OR 13.25), Down syndrome (OR 22.10), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (OR 4.28), or history of LRTI (OR 8.28), moist cough (OR 9.17) or oxygen supplementation (OR 6.19). Children with multisystem involvement demonstrated a higher association with pneumonia, but no difference was found for age. We conclude that the impact of OPA on development of pneumonia is considerably reduced once other factors in children with multisystem involvement are taken into account.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/complications , Deglutition Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Aspiration/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Asthma/complications , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Deglutition Disorders/classification , Down Syndrome/complications , Female , Fluoroscopy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Odds Ratio , Pneumonia, Aspiration/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
5.
Pediatr Radiol ; 37(3): 283-90, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17216172

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are minimal data on radiation doses to infants and children undergoing a modified barium swallow (MBS) study. OBJECTIVE: To document screening times, dose area product (DAP) and effective doses to children undergoing MBS and to determine factors associated with increased screening times and effective dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fluoroscopic data (screening time, DAP, kVp) for 90 consecutive MBS studies using pulse fluoroscopy were prospectively recorded; effective dose was calculated and data were analyzed for effects of behavior, number of swallow presentations, swallowing dysfunction and medical problems. RESULTS: Mean effective dose for the entire group was 0.0826 +/- 0.0544 mSv, screening time 2.48 +/- 0.81 min, and DAP 28.79 +/- 41.72 cGy cm2. Significant differences were found across three age groups (1.0-3.0 and >3.0 years) for effective dose (mean 0.1188, 0.0651 and 0.0529 mSv, respectively; P < 0.001), but not for screening time or DAP. Effective dose was correlated with screening time (P = 0.007), DAP (P < 0.001), number of swallow presentations (P = 0.007), lower age (P = 0.017), female gender (P = 0.004), and height (P < 0.001). Screening time was correlated with total number of swallow presentations (P < 0.001) and DAP (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Screening times, DAP, effective dose, and child and procedural factors associated with higher effective doses are presented for children undergoing MBS studies.


Subject(s)
Barium Sulfate , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Radiation Dosage , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Age Factors , Barium Sulfate/administration & dosage , Body Height , Child , Child, Preschool , Deglutition Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Esophagus/diagnostic imaging , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Humans , Infant , Male , Nasopharynx/diagnostic imaging , Oropharynx/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Respiratory Aspiration/diagnostic imaging , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Trachea/diagnostic imaging
6.
Early Hum Dev ; 76(1): 23-37, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14729160

ABSTRACT

This study examined the oral sensitivity and feeding skills of low-risk pre-term infants at 11-17 months corrected age. Twenty pre-term infants (PT) born between 32 and 37 weeks at birth without any medical comorbidities were assessed. All of this PT group received supplemental nasogastric (NG) tube feeds during their birth-stay in hospital. A matched control group of 10 healthy full-term infants (FT) was also assessed. Oral sensitivity and feeding skills were assessed during a typical mealtime using the Royal Children's Hospital Oral Sensitivity Checklist (OSC) and the Pre-Speech Assessment Scale (PSAS). Results demonstrated that, at 11-17 months corrected age, the PT group displayed significantly more behaviours suggestive of altered oral sensitivity and facial defensiveness, and a trend of more delayed feeding development than the FT group. Further, results demonstrated that, relative to the FT group, pre-term infants who received greater than 3 weeks of NG feeding (PT>3NG) displayed significantly more facial defensive behaviour, and displayed significant delays across more aspects of their feeding development than pre-term infants who received less than 2 weeks of NG feeding (PT<2NG). The information from this preliminary study suggests that low-risk pre-term infants, particularly those who receive supplemental NG feeding for greater than 3 weeks, may be at risk for displaying long-term altered oral sensitivity and facial defensiveness, as well as feeding delays. These observations warrant further investigation on this topic.


Subject(s)
Child Development , Enteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Feeding Behavior/psychology , Infant, Premature/psychology , Mouth/physiopathology , Sensation , Feeding Behavior/physiology , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature/physiology , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Male
7.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch ; 29(1): 11-23, 1998 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27764296

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have shown that multiple birth children (MBC) are prone to early phonological difficulties and later literacy problems. However, to date, there has been no systematic long-term follow-up of MBC with phonological difficulties in the preschool years to determine whether these difficulties predict later literacy problems. In this study, 20 MBC whose early speech and language skills had been previously documented were compared to normative data and 20 singleton controls on tasks assessing phonological processing and literacy. The major findings indicated that MBC performed significantly more poorly on some tasks of phonological processing than singleton controls did. Further, the early phonological skills of MBC (i.e., the number of inappropriate phonological processes used) were correlated with poor performance on visual rhyme recognition, word repetition, and phoneme detection tasks 5 years later. There was no significant relationship between early biological factors (birth weight and gestation period) and performance on the phonological processing and literacy-related subtests. These results support the hypothesis that MBC's early speech and language difficulties are not merely a transient phase of development, but a real disorder, with consequences for later academic achievement.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL