Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Public Health Dent ; 56(4): 223-5, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8906707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: People infected with HIV choose dental care in dedicated or mainstreamed facilities. In this study, people with HIV were asked whether they sought care in dedicated or mainstreamed dental facilities, their reasons for choosing this source of care, their HIV disclosure experiences, and what, if any, consequences the disclosure had on access to dental care. METHODS: Patients in a dedicated AIDS medical clinic (n = 84) responded to questions in a telephone survey. The sample was predominantly gay, white males with symptomatic HIV infection, from randomly chosen clinic appointments. RESULTS: The study found that 67.6 percent of respondents who had seen a dentist since their HIV diagnosis chose mainstreamed dental facilities. The majority of study participants (70%) disclosed their HIV status. Of those subjects who chose disclosure, discrimination was minimal (2.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest support for public policy encouraging people with HIV to go to any dentist with whom they feel most comfortable and with whom they will receive the best possible care, regardless of whether the dentist practices in a dedicated or mainstreamed facility.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Chronically Ill , Dental Facilities , HIV Infections , Self Disclosure , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Dentist-Patient Relations , Dentists , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Homosexuality , Humans , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Prejudice , Public Policy , Telephone , White People
2.
DICP ; 25(12): 1374-8, 1991 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1815436

ABSTRACT

Patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receive numerous medications from multiple providers. As a result, it is important that medication usage is properly documented in each patient's medical record. Lack of adequate documentation may confound a provider's assessment of drug efficacy, potentially leading to an increased incidence of drug interactions and adverse effects. The objective of this study was to determine if discrepancies exist between patient-reported medication usage and that documented in the medical record by healthcare providers. Data were obtained using structured telephone surveys and medical chart review. Study participants were recruited from the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center AIDS Clinic. Results obtained for 41 patients demonstrated discrepancies between patient-reported medication usage and that documented in the medical record ranging from 9 to 92 percent, depending on the class of drug. The largest differences were observed with the "as-needed" class of drugs: benzodiazepines (92 percent), morphine (60 percent), and codeine (56 percent). Differences were also noted for scheduled medications: ketoconazole (54 percent), clotrimazole (45 percent), acyclovir (38 percent), zidovudine (15 percent), and pentamidine (9 percent). These observed discrepancies reaffirm the need for accurate exchange of information between provider and patient to promote the most effective, rational, and safe drug therapy. Careful reviews of medication usage at each visit and use of pharmacy-based medication profiles are potential mechanisms to improve documentation of medication usage in HIV-infected patients.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Medical Records , Patient Compliance , Self Administration , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , San Francisco
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1987351

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to describe the utilization and characteristics associated with the use of prescribed, over-the-counter, investigational, and unorthodox treatments among AIDS clinic patients. This report is derived from cross-sectional data obtained using structured telephone surveys. Study participants (n = 197) were recruited from the University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center AIDS clinic. One hundred eighty-nine participants (96%) received 1-24 prescription medications during the 3 months prior to interview. Those with an AIDS diagnosis received a relatively greater number of prescription drugs (p = 0.0001); an average of 5.6 prescribed medications were used by AIDS patients versus 4.8 among AIDS-related complex and 2.3 among asymptomatic patients. Thirty-one percent participated in drug trials during the 3 months before interview, including 18% who were in multiple studies. Twenty-nine percent used unorthodox treatments. Seventy-five (40%) received prescription medication from a provider other than their primary provider. A more advanced stage of illness was associated with the use of unorthodox treatments (p = 0.003): users of these treatments had a greater educational attainment than nonusers (p = 0.03) and were significantly less likely to report that their primary provider was aware of all the treatments they used (odds ratio = 2.1, p less than 0.03). We conclude that use of polypharmacy among some AIDS clinic patients is common, could create an increased risk for adverse drug reactions, and may affect clinical drug trials. Despite having decided to obtain care at a university-based clinic, many of the participants of this study also chose to receive unorthodox therapies and care from nonprimary medical providers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , AIDS-Related Complex/drug therapy , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Clinical Trials as Topic , Complementary Therapies , Drug Prescriptions , Drug Therapy, Combination , Drugs, Investigational/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Illicit Drugs , Male , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use
4.
Am J Public Health ; 81(1): 79-84, 1991 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1983921

ABSTRACT

We used structured telephone interviews to determine the extent of work loss following onset of symptoms, the interval between onset of symptoms and cessation of work, and the risk factors for work loss among 193 persons with symptoms of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related illness attending the AIDS Clinic at the University of California, San Francisco, between October 1, 1988, and September 30, 1989. Estimates of the duration of time between onset of HIV-related symptoms and work loss derive from the life table method of Kaplan and Meier. A Cox proportional hazards model is used to estimate the effect of risk factors on the probability of withdrawing from work in each time interval. Eighty-six percent of the respondents worked prior to onset of the first symptom of HIV-related illness; 40 percent were working at the time of the most recent interview, a mean of 958 days later. The total number of hours worked declined by 59 percent during this time. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicates that 50 percent who worked prior to onset of HIV-related illness stopped working within two years and all had stopped within 10 years after onset of the first symptom.


Subject(s)
Employment , HIV Infections , Adult , Efficiency , Female , Humans , Life Tables , Male , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Sampling Studies , San Francisco , Time Factors , Unemployment
5.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 119(5): 601-3, 1989 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2532657

ABSTRACT

Three studies were conducted to assess the experiences of persons with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or risk factors for the disease in seeking dental care in Los Angeles; San Francisco; Seattle; and Tacoma, WA. Given previous reports from surveys of dentists that they would be reluctant to provide care to people from these groups, widespread denial of care was expected. Our two surveys conducted in San Francisco, however, showed that only 1.3% and 10.8% had been denied care by a dentist. These data suggest that dentist reactions to people with AIDS are more favorable than has previously been suggested, although denial of care is still a problem to some extent.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , Dental Care for Disabled , HIV Infections , HIV Seropositivity , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , California , Cohort Studies , Dentists , Homosexuality , Humans , Los Angeles , Male , Self Disclosure , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Washington
6.
J Invest Dermatol ; 91(1): 29-33, 1988 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3385214

ABSTRACT

The percutaneous absorption of four steroids (hydrocortisone, estradiol, testosterone, and progesterone) has been measured in vivo in man under occluded and "protected" (i.e., covered, but non-occlusive) conditions. The experimental approach, involving simple modifications of standard radiochemical methodology, has enabled excellent "mass balance" and dose accountability to be achieved. Consequently, the utility of the procedure for the measurement of in vivo topical bioavailability can be inferred. In addition, because of the precision and accountability of the results, the technique offers a potential means to establish quantitative structure-penetration relationships for skin absorption in man. It was found that steroid absorption increased with increasing lipophilicity up to a point, but that penetration of progesterone (the most hydophobic analog studied) did not continue the trend and was at least partly rate-limited by slow interfacial transport at the stratum corneum-viable epidermis boundary. Comparison of data obtained from the occluded and "protected" experiments permitted the effect of occlusion (defined as the complete impairment of passive transepidermal water loss at the application site) to be assessed. Occlusion significantly increased percutaneous absorption of estradiol, testosterone, and progesterone but did not effect the penetration of hydrocortisone. A mechanism is proposed to explain why the absorption of the more lipophilic steroids is enhanced by occlusion but that of the most water-soluble (i.e., hydrocortisone) is not. It is suggested that the rate-determining role of the sequential steps involved in percutaneous absorption can be revealed by experiments of the type described using related series of homologous or analogous chemicals.


Subject(s)
Skin/metabolism , Steroids/pharmacokinetics , Absorption , Administration, Topical , Biological Availability , Humans , Male , Methods , Occlusive Dressings
7.
J Toxicol Environ Health ; 24(3): 279-89, 1988.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3260963

ABSTRACT

Hydroquinone was found to penetrate readily human forehead skin in vivo following a single topical exposure, in an alcoholic vehicle, of 24 h duration. Percutaneous absorption was estimated using radiotracer methodology and 14C-labeled hydroquinone. The effects of a penetration enhancer, 1-dodecylazacycloheptan-2-one, and a sunscreen, the 2-ethylhexyl ester of 4-(dimethylamino)benzoic acid, on the percutaneous absorption of hydroquinone were investigated. In vivo penetration of hydroquinone was significantly decreased (a less than 0.05) by the addition of the 2-ethylhexyl ester of 4-(dimethylamino)benzoic acid (3% w/w) to the vehicle. The penetration enhancer, 1-dodecylazacycloheptan-2-one (0.5% w/w), did not significantly increase (a greater than 0.05) the absorption of hydroquinone. From all hydroquinone preparations, percutaneous absorption was rapid and peak elimination occurred within the first 12 h following application. Elimination was complete within 5 d.


Subject(s)
4-Aminobenzoic Acid/pharmacology , Aminobenzoates/pharmacology , Azepines/pharmacology , Hydroquinones/pharmacokinetics , Skin Absorption/drug effects , Sunscreening Agents/pharmacology , Humans , para-Aminobenzoates
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...