Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Concussion ; 8(3): CNC105, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37691853

ABSTRACT

Aim: To examine the impact of concussion on objective measures of school performance. Materials & methods: Population-based matched cohort study using linked health and education records of young people aged ≤18 years hospitalized with concussion in New South Wales, Australia, during 2005-2018, and matched comparisons not hospitalized with any injury. Results: Young people with concussion had higher risk of not achieving the national minimum standards for literacy and numeracy assessments, ranging from 30% for numeracy to 43% for spelling, and not completing high school, ranging from 29% for year 10 to 77% for year 12, compared with matched peers. Conclusion: Young people hospitalized with concussion have impaired school performance compared with uninjured matched peers.

2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 929, 2023 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37649056

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss can have a negative impact on individuals' health and engagement with social activities. Integrated approaches that tackle barriers and social outcomes could mitigate some of these effects for cochlear implants (CI) users. This review aims to synthesise the evidence of the impact of a CI on adults' health service utilisation and social outcomes. METHODS: Five databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, ERIC, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were searched from 1st January 2000 to 16 January 2023 and May 2023. Articles that reported on health service utilisation or social outcomes post-CI in adults aged ≥ 18 years were included. Health service utilisation includes hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) presentations, general practitioner (GP) visits, CI revision surgery and pharmaceutical use. Social outcomes include education, autonomy, social participation, training, disability, social housing, social welfare benefits, occupation, employment, income level, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QoL), communication and cognition. Searched articles were screened in two stages ̶̶̶ by going through the title and abstract then full text. Information extracted from the included studies was narratively synthesised. RESULTS: There were 44 studies included in this review, with 20 (45.5%) cohort studies, 18 (40.9%) cross-sectional and six (13.6%) qualitative studies. Nine studies (20.5%) reported on health service utilisation and 35 (79.5%) on social outcomes. Five out of nine studies showed benefits of CI in improving adults' health service utilisation including reduced use of prescription medication, reduced number of surgical and audiological visits. Most of the studies 27 (77.1%) revealed improvements for at least one social outcome, such as work or employment 18 (85.7%), social participation 14 (93.3%), autonomy 8 (88.9%), education (all nine studies), perceived hearing disability (five out of six studies) and income (all three studies) post-CI. None of the included studies had a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified beneficial impacts of CI in improving adults' health service utilisation and social outcomes. Improvement in hearing enhanced social interactions and working lives. There is a need for large scale, well-designed epidemiological studies examining health and social outcomes post-CI.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Adult , Humans , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Services
3.
Arch Dis Child ; 108(10): 808-814, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37423641

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare academic performance and high school completion of young people hospitalised for a burn compared with young people not hospitalised for an injury. DESIGN: A retrospective population-based matched case-comparison cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Young people aged ≤18 years hospitalised for a burn during 2005-2018 in New South Wales, Australia, with age, sex and residential postcode-matched peers not hospitalised for any injury during 1 July 2001 and 31 December 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance below the national minimum standard (NMS) on the National Assessment Plan for Literacy and Numeracy assessments and not completing high school. RESULTS: Young females hospitalised for a burn had a 72% higher risk of poorer reading compared with their peers (adjusted relative risk (ARR) 1.72; 95% CI 1.33 to 2.23), while young males hospitalised with a burn showed no higher risk (ARR 1.14; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.43). Young males (ARR 1.05; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.35) and females (ARR 1.34; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.94) hospitalised with a burn had no higher risk of not reaching the NMS for numeracy compared with peers. Young people hospitalised with a burn had at least twice the risk of not completing year 10 (ARR 3.86; 95% CI 1.68 to 8.86), year 11 (ARR 2.45; 95% CI 1.89 to 3.18) and year 12 (ARR 2.09; 95% CI 1.63 to 2.67) compared with matched counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Young females hospitalised with a burn displayed poorer academic performance for reading compared with matched peers, while males and females were more likely to leave school earlier. Identifying unmet learning support needs of young burn survivors should be investigated.


Subject(s)
Burns , Hospitalization , Male , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Burns/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies
4.
Front Psychiatry ; 14: 1040636, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36960461

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Adolescents frequently use informal support seeking to cope with stress and worries. Past research in face-to-face contexts has shown that the relationship between informal support seeking and mental health is influenced by the specific strategy used and the mode through which support is sought. To date, little research has considered the relationship between support seeking online and adolescent mental health. Methods: In this study, structural equation modeling (SEM) examined the mediating role of co-rumination in the relationships between seeking support from friends or online and two measures of mental health: depression and anxiety. Participants were 186 adolescent girls, drawn from four independent girls' schools in Sydney, Australia. Four brief vignettes described common social stressors and participants rated their likelihood of seeking support from close friends and from informal online sources. Co-rumination was measured using a short form of the Co-rumination Questionnaire and depression and anxiety were measured with the youth version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-Youth (DASS-Y). Results: Different patterns of findings were found for support seeking from close friends and support seeking online. First, support seeking from friends was related to lower levels of depression and anxiety while seeking support online was related to higher levels depression and anxiety. Second, co-rumination suppressed the relationship between seeking support from friends and depression, but not online support seeking and depression or anxiety. Discussion: These findings suggest that co-rumination reduces the benefits of seeking support from friends but is unrelated to online support seeking. The findings also confirm the problematic nature of online support seeking for adolescent girls' mental health, particularly in response to social stressors.

5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 1359, 2022 Nov 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36384531

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To inform healthcare planning and resourcing, population-level information is required on the use of health services among young people with a mental disorder. This study aims to identify the health service use associated with mental disorders among young people using a population-level matched cohort. METHOD: A population-based matched case-comparison retrospective cohort study of young people aged ≤ 18 years hospitalised for a mental disorder during 2005-2018 in New South Wales, Australia was conducted using linked birth, health, and mortality records. The comparison cohort was matched on age, sex and residential postcode. Adjusted rate ratios (ARR) were calculated for key demographics and mental disorder type by sex. RESULTS: Emergency department visits, hospital admissions and ambulatory mental health service contacts were all higher for males and females with a mental disorder than matched peers. Further hospitalisation risk was over 10-fold higher for males with psychotic (ARR 13.69; 95%CI 8.95-20.94) and anxiety (ARR 11.44; 95%CI 8.70-15.04) disorders, and for both males and females with cognitive and behavioural delays (ARR 10.79; 95%CI 9.30-12.53 and ARR 14.62; 95%CI 11.20-19.08, respectively), intellectual disability (ARR 10.47; 95%CI 8.04-13.64 and ARR 11.35; 95%CI 7.83-16.45, respectively), and mood disorders (ARR 10.23; 95%CI 8.17-12.80 and ARR 10.12; 95%CI 8.58-11.93, respectively) compared to peers. CONCLUSION: The high healthcare utilisation of young people with mental disorder supports the need for the development of community and hospital-based services that both prevent unnecessary hospital admissions in childhood and adolescence that can potentially reduce the burden and loss arising from mental disorders in adult life.


Subject(s)
Intellectual Disability , Mental Health Services , Adult , Adolescent , Male , Female , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Patient Acceptance of Health Care
6.
BMJ Open ; 12(10): e065567, 2022 10 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36302569

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: While the majority of adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss and poor speech perception outcomes with hearing aids benefit from receiving a cochlear implant, the long-term health and social benefits for implant recipients are yet to be explored. The objective of the ARCHS research is to provide a better understanding of the health and social factors that play a role in the lives of adults with a cochlear implant up to 10 years after the procedure. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This research will involve conducting two retrospective cohort studies of adults aged ≥18 years who received a cochlear implant during 2011-2021 using linked administrative data first within New South Wales (NSW) and second Australia-wide. It will examine health service use and compare health and social outcomes for younger (18-64 years) and older (≥65 years) cochlear implant recipients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was received from the NSW Population Health Services Research Ethics Committee for the NSW cohort study (Reference: 2022/ETH00382/2022.07) and from the Macquarie University ethics committee for the national cohort study (Reference: 520221151437084). Research findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Aids , Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Cochlear Implantation/methods
7.
Injury ; 53(8): 2783-2789, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35718567

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Children and young people who sustain injuries resulting in a hospital admission may experience adverse effects for months or years following the event. Understanding the attributable burden and health service needs is vital for public health planning as well as individual care provision. This study aims to identify the hospitalised morbidity associated with injury among young people by sex using a population-level matched cohort. METHOD: A population-level matched case-comparison retrospective cohort study of young people aged ≤18 years hospitalised for an injury during 2005-2018 in New South Wales, Australia using linked birth, health, and mortality records. The comparison cohort was matched on age, gender and residential postcode. Adjusted rate ratios (ARR) were calculated for age group, injury severity and nature of injury by sex. RESULTS: There were 122,660 (60.9%) males and 78,712 (39.1%) females aged ≤18 years hospitalised after sustaining an injury. Males (ARR 2.89; 95%CI 2.81-2.97) and females (ARR 2.79; 95%CI 2.68-2.90) who were hospitalised after an injury had a higher risk of subsequent hospital admission than their matched peers. Males (ARR 3.38; 95%CI 2.81-4.05) and females (ARR 3.41; 95%CI 2.72-4.26) with serious injuries had a higher risk of admission compared to peers. Males with dislocations, sprains and strains (ARR 3.40; 95%CI 3.03-3.82), burns (ARR 3.37; 95%CI 2.99-3.80), and fractures (ARR 3.20; 95%CI 3.07-3.33), and females with burns (ARR 3.84; 95%CI 3.40-4.33), dislocations, sprains and strains (ARR 3.54; 95%CI 2.96-4.23), and traumatic brain injury (ARR 3.39; 95%CI 3.01-3.82) had the highest risk of subsequent hospitalisation compared to peers. CONCLUSION: Patient management and care extends beyond the injury admission as many young people face high levels of contact with health services in the months and years following injury. These findings will inform health service planning and trauma care management for young people and families affected by injury.


Subject(s)
Burns , Sprains and Strains , Adolescent , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospitalization , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
8.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 58(8): 1439-1446, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35638474

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study aims to identify the hospitalised morbidity associated with three common chronic health conditions among young people using a population-based matched cohort. METHODS: A population-level matched case-comparison retrospective cohort study of young people aged ≤18 years hospitalised with asthma, type 1 diabetes (T1D) or epilepsy during 2005-2018 in New South Wales, Australia using linked birth, health and mortality records. The comparison cohort was matched on age, sex and residential postcode. Adjusted rate ratios (ARR) were calculated by sex and age group. RESULTS: There were 65 055 young people hospitalised with asthma, 6648 with epilepsy, and 2209 with T1D. Young people with epilepsy (ARR 10.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.98-12.02), T1D (ARR 8.64; 95% CI 7.72-9.67) or asthma (ARR 4.39; 95% CI 4.26-4.53) all had a higher risk of hospitalisation than matched peers. Admission risk was highest for males (ARR 11.00; 95% CI 9.64-12.56) and females with epilepsy (ARR 10.83; 95% CI 9.54-12.29) compared to peers. The highest admission risk by age group was for young people aged 10-14 years (ARR 5.50; 95% CI 4.77-6.34) living with asthma, children aged ≤4 years (ARR 12.68; 95% CI 11.35-14.17) for those living with epilepsy, and children aged 5-9 years (ARR 9.12; 95% CI 7.69-10.81) for those living with T1D compared to peers. CONCLUSIONS: The results will guide health service planning and highlight opportunities for better management of chronic health conditions, such as further care integration between acute, primary and community health services for young people.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Epilepsy , Adolescent , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/therapy , Child , Chronic Disease , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/therapy , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
9.
Seizure ; 99: 91-98, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35617806

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare academic performance and high school completion of young people admitted to hospital with epilepsy and matched peers from the general population not admitted to hospital with epilepsy during the study period. METHODS: A population-based matched case-comparison cohort study of young people aged ≤18 years hospitalised with epilepsy during 2005-2018 in New South Wales, Australia, using linked birth, health, education, and mortality records. The comparison cohort was matched on age, sex, and residential postcode. Generalised linear mixed modelling examined risk of school performance below the national minimum standard (NMS), and generalised linear regression examined risk of not completing high school for young people hospitalised with epilepsy compared to matched peers not hospitalised with epilepsy during the study period. Adjusted relative risks (ARRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived from the final models. RESULTS: Young people hospitalised with epilepsy had more than 3 times higher risk of not achieving the NMS for numeracy (ARR: 3.40; 95%CI 2.76‒4.18) and reading (ARR: 3.15; 95%CI 2.60‒3.82), compared to matched peers. Young people hospitalised with epilepsy had a 78% higher risk of not completing year 10 (ARR: 1.78; 95%CI 1.14‒2.79), 18% higher risk of not completing year 11 (ARR: 1.18; 95%CI 0.97‒1.45), and 38% higher risk of not completing year 12 (ARR: 1.38; 95%CI 1.14‒1.67), compared to matched counterparts. CONCLUSION: Young people hospitalised with epilepsy have higher risk of not achieving minimum standards for numeracy and reading and not completing high school compared to matched peers. There is a need for effective strategies and interventions (e.g., early seizure control and improved multidisciplinary management and care coordination) to minimise the potential adverse effect of epilepsy on education and its sequelae such as early school leaving, unemployment and poverty in adulthood.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Educational Status , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Humans , Schools
10.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 23(3): 411-420, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35080102

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The impact of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) on academic performance is inconclusive. This study aims to compare scholastic performance and high-school completion in young people hospitalized with T1D compared to matched peers not hospitalized with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective case-comparison cohort study. METHOD: A population-level matched case-comparison study of people aged ≤18 hospitalized with T1D during 2005-2018 in New South Wales, Australia using linked health-related and education records. The comparison cohort was matched on age, gender, and residential postcode. Generalized linear mixed modeling examined risk of school performance below the national minimum standard (NMS) and generalized linear regression examined risk of not completing high school for young people hospitalized with T1D compared to peers. Adjusted relative risks (ARR) were calculated. RESULTS: Young females and males hospitalized with T1D did not have a higher risk of not achieving the NMS compared to peers for numeracy (ARR: 1.19; 95%CI 0.77-1.84 and ARR: 0.74; 95%CI 0.46-1.19) or reading (ARR: 0.98; 95%CI 0.63-1.50 and ARR: 0.85; 95%CI 0.58-1.24), respectively. Young T1D hospitalized females had a higher risk of not completing year 11 (ARR: 1.73; 95%CI 1.19-2.53) or 12 (ARR: 1.65; 95%CI 1.17-2.33) compared to peers, while hospitalized T1D males did not. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in academic performance in youth hospitalized with T1D compared to peers. Improved glucose control and T1D management may explain the absence of school performance decrements in students with T1D. However, females hospitalized with T1D had a higher risk of not completing high school. Potential associations of this increased risk, with attention to T1D and psycho-social management, should be investigated.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Adolescent , Aged , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Schools
11.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 52(2): 286-296, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34564913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is inconclusive evidence of the effect of asthma on the academic performance of young people. This study aims to compare scholastic performance and high school completion of young people hospitalized with asthma compared to matched peers not hospitalized with asthma. METHOD: A population-based matched case-comparison cohort study of young people aged ≤18 years hospitalized for asthma during 2005-2018 in New South Wales, Australia using linked birth, health, education and mortality records. The comparison cohort was matched on age, gender and residential postcode. Generalized linear mixed-modelling examined risk of school performance below the national minimum standard (NMS) and generalized linear regression examined risk of not completing high school for young people hospitalized with asthma compared to matched peers. RESULTS: Young males hospitalized with asthma had a 13% and 15% higher risk of not achieving the NMS for numeracy (95%CI 1.04-1.22) and reading (95%CI 1.07-1.23), respectively, compared to peers. Young males hospitalized with asthma had a 51% (95%CI 1.22-1.86) higher risk of not completing year 10, and around a 20% higher risk of not completing year 11 (ARR: 1.25; 95%CI 1.15-1.36) or year 12 (ARR: 1.27; 95%CI 1.17-1.39) compared to peers. Young females hospitalized with asthma showed no difference in achieving numeracy or reading NMSs, but did have a 21% higher risk of not completing year 11 (95%CI 1.09-1.36) and a 33% higher risk of not completing year 12 (95%CI 1.19-1.49) compared to peers. CONCLUSIONS: Educational attainment is worse for young people hospitalized with asthma compared to matched peers. Early intervention and strategies for better management of asthma symptoms may enhance academic performance for students.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Schools , Adolescent , Asthma/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Students
12.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 56(12): 1602-1616, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34875885

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Young people with a mental disorder often perform poorly at school and can fail to complete high school. This study aims to compare scholastic performance and high school completion of young people hospitalised with a mental disorder compared to young people not hospitalised for a mental disorder health condition by gender. METHOD: A population-based matched case-comparison cohort study of young people aged ⩽18 years hospitalised for a mental disorder during 2005-2018 in New South Wales, Australia using linked birth, health, education and mortality records. The comparison cohort was matched on age, gender and residential postcode. Generalised linear mixed modelling examined risk of school performance below the national minimum standard and generalised linear regression examined risk of not completing high school for young people with a mental disorder compared to matched peers. RESULTS: Young males with a mental disorder had over a 1.7 times higher risk of not achieving the national minimum standard for numeracy (adjusted relative risk: 1.71; 95% confidence interval: [1.35, 2.15]) and reading (adjusted relative risk: 1.99; 95% confidence interval: [1.80, 2.20]) compared to matched peers. Young females with a mental disorder had around 1.5 times higher risk of not achieving the national minimum standard for numeracy (adjusted relative risk: 1.50; 95% confidence interval: [1.14, 1.96]) compared to matched peers. Both young males and females with a disorder had around a three times higher risk of not completing high school compared to peers. Young males with multiple disorders had up to a sixfold increased risk and young females with multiple disorders had up to an eightfold increased risk of not completing high school compared to peers. CONCLUSION: Early recognition and support could improve school performance and educational outcomes for young people who were hospitalised with a mental disorder. This support should be provided in conjunction with access to mental health services and school involvement and assistance.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Male , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Aged , Cohort Studies , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Schools , Educational Status , Australia/epidemiology
13.
BMC Pediatr ; 21(1): 426, 2021 09 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34563157

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Exploring the impact of injury and injury severity on academic outcomes could assist to identify characteristics of young people likely to require learning support services. This study aims to compare scholastic performance and high school completion of young people hospitalised for an injury compared to young people not hospitalised for an injury by injury severity; and to examine factors influencing scholastic performance and school completion. METHOD: A population-based matched case-comparison cohort study of young people aged ≤18 years hospitalised for an injury during 2005-2018 in New South Wales, Australia using linked birth, health, education and mortality records. The comparison cohort was matched on age, gender and residential postcode. Generalised linear mixed modelling examined risk of performance below the national minimum standard (NMS) on the National Assessment Plan for Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) and generalised linear regression examined risk of not completing high school for injured young people compared to matched peers. RESULTS: Injured young people had a higher risk of not achieving the NMS compared to their matched peers for numeracy (ARR: 1.12; 95%CI 1.06-1.17), reading (ARR: 1.09; 95%CI 1.04-1.13), spelling (ARR: 1.13; 95%CI 1.09-1.18), grammar (ARR: 1.11; 95%CI 1.06-1.15), and writing (ARR: 1.07; 95%CI 1.04-1.11). As injury severity increased from minor to serious, the risk of not achieving the NMS generally increased for injured young people compared to matched peers. Injured young people had almost twice the risk of not completing high school at year 10 (ARR: 2.17; 95%CI 1.73-2.72), year 11 (ARR: 1.95; 95%CI 1.78-2.14) or year 12 (ARR: 1.93; 95%CI 1.78-2.08) compared to matched peers. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of characteristics of young people most likely to encounter problems in the academic environment after sustaining an injury is important to facilitate the potential need for learning support. Assessing learning needs and monitoring return-to-school progress post-injury may aid identification of any ongoing learning support requirements.


Subject(s)
Schools , Adolescent , Australia/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Educational Status , Humans , Retrospective Studies
14.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 3(1): e000530, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31548999

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Children who have sustained a serious injury or who have a chronic health condition, such as diabetes or epilepsy, may have their school performance adversely impacted by the condition, treatment of the condition and/or time away from school. Examining the potential adverse impact requires the identification of children most likely to be affected and the use of objective measures of education performance. This may highlight educational disparities that could be addressed with learning support. This study aims to examine education performance, school completion and health outcomes of children in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, who were hospitalised with an injury or a chronic health condition compared with children who have not been hospitalised for these conditions. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This research will be a retrospective population-level case-comparison study of hospitalised injured or chronically ill children (ie, diabetes, epilepsy, asthma or mental health conditions) aged ≤18 years in NSW, Australia, using linked health and education administrative data collections. It will examine the education performance, school completion and health outcomes of children who have been hospitalised in NSW with an injury or a chronic health condition compared with children randomly drawn from the NSW population (matched on gender, age and residential postcode) who have not been hospitalised for these conditions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received ethics approval from the NSW Population Health Services Research Ethics Committee (2018HRE0904). Findings from the research will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...