When concealed handgun licensees break bad: criminal convictions of concealed handgun licensees in Texas, 2001-2009.

OBJECTIVES: We explored differences in criminal convictions between holders and nonholders of a concealed handgun license (CHL) in Texas. METHODS: The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) provides annual data on criminal convictions of holders and nonholders of CHLs. We used 2001 to 2009 DPS data to investigate the differences in the distribution of convictions for these 2 groups across 9 types of criminal offenses. We calculated z scores for the differences in the types of crimes for which CHL holders and nonholders were convicted. RESULTS: CHL holders were much less likely than nonlicensees to be convicted of crimes. Most nonholder convictions involved higher-prevalence crimes (burglary, robbery, or simple assault). CHL holders' convictions were more likely to involve lower-prevalence crimes, such as sexual offenses, gun offenses, or offenses involving a death. CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that expanding the settings in which concealed carry is permitted may increase the risk of specific types of crimes, some quite serious in those settings. These increased risks may be relatively small. Nonetheless, policymakers should consider these risks when contemplating reducing the scope of gun-free zones.

The relationship between formal and informal care among adult Medicaid Personal Care Services recipients.

OBJECTIVES: To test hypotheses concerning the relationship between formal and informal care and to estimate the impact of hours of formal care authorized for Medicaid Personal Care Services (PCS) on the utilization of informal care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data included home care use and adult Medicaid beneficiary characteristics from assessments of PCS need in four Medicaid administrative areas in Texas. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional design using ordinary least-squares (OLS) and instrumental variable (IV) methods. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The study database consisted of assessment data on 471 adults receiving Medicaid PCS from 2004 to 2006. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Both OLS and IV estimates of the impact of formal care on informal care indicated no statistically significant relationship. The impact of formal care authorized on informal care utilization was less important than the influence of beneficiary need and caregiver availability. Living with a potential informal caregiver dramatically increased the hours of informal care utilized by Medicaid PCS beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: More formal home care hours were not associated with fewer informal home care hours. These results imply that policies that decrease the availability of formal home care for Medicaid PCS beneficiaries will not be offset by an increase in the provision of informal care and may result in unmet care needs.