Patient and family perceptions of a discharge bedside board.

Objective: To explore patient and family perspectives of a discharge bedside board for supporting engagement in patient care and discharge planning to inform tool revision. Methods: This qualitative descriptive study included 45 semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of English-speaking patients (n = 44; mean age 58.5 years) and their family members (n = 5) across seven adult inpatient units at a tertiary acute care hospital in mid-western Canada. Thematic (interviews), content (board, organization procedure document), and framework-guided integrated (all data) analyses were performed. Results: Four themes were generated from interview data: understanding the board, included essential information to guide care, balancing information on the board, and maintaining a sense of connection. Despite application inconsistencies, documented standard procedures aligned with recommended board (re)orientation, timely patient-friendly content, attention to privacy, and patient-provider engagement strategies. Conclusion: Findings indicate the tool supported consultation and some involvement level engagement in patient care and discharge. Board information was usually valued, however, perceived procedural gaps in tool education, privacy, and the quality of tool-related communication offer opportunities to strengthen patients' and families' tool experience. Innovation: Novel application of a continuum engagement framework in the exploration of multiple data sources generated significant insights to guide tool revision.

Effects of drugs and drug combinations in pigeons trained to discriminate among pentobarbital, dizocilpine, a combination of these drugs, and saline.

Drugs with multiple actions can have complex discriminative-stimulus properties. An approach to studying such drugs is to train subjects to discriminate among drug combinations and individual drugs in the combination so that all of the complex discriminative stimuli are present during training. In the current experiments, a four-choice procedure was used to train pigeons to discriminate among dizocilpine (noncompetitive NMDA receptor blocker), pentobarbital (GABA(A) receptor agonist), a fixed-dose combination of these two drugs, and saline. Following extended training, low doses of pentobarbital or dizocilpine administered alone produced saline-appropriate responding. Higher doses of pentobarbital produced responding on the pentobarbital-appropriate key and higher doses of dizocilpine produced responding on the dizocilpine key. Administering the lowest doses of pentobarbital and dizocilpine together resulted in responding on the saline-appropriate key. Increasing the dose of pentobarbital in the presence of low doses of dizocilpine produced responding primarily on the pentobarbital-appropriate key; increasing the dose of dizocilpine in the presence of the lowest dose of pentobarbital produced responding primarily on the dizocilpine-appropriate key. Combining the higher doses of pentobarbital and dizocilpine resulted in responding primarily on the drug-combination key. Low doses of phencyclidine or ethanol produced responding on the saline-appropriate key, but intermediate doses resulted in individual subjects responding predominately on either the pentobarbital key, the dizocilpine key, or the drug-combination key depending on the subject. After the highest dose of phencyclidine or ethanol, most subjects responded predominantly on the drug-combination key. Low doses of other drugs tested produced responding on the saline-appropriate key. With the highest diazepam doses responding was largely confined to the pentobarbital-appropriate key. The highest doses of dextromethorphan or dextrorphan resulted in responding on the dizocilpine key more frequently than on other keys. Across a range of doses, morphine produced responding predominantly on the saline key. The results using the four-key procedure emphasized the role of both GABA(A) and NMDA receptors in the complex discriminative stimulus properties of phencyclidine and of ethanol.

Bioavailability of (+)-methamphetamine in the pigeon following an intramuscular dose.

Pigeons are used frequently as subjects in behavioral pharmacology research. An advantage of the pigeon is an exceedingly vascular breast muscle, which is easily accessible for injections. The purpose of these studies was to provide a profile of the pharmacokinetics of (+)-methamphetamine (METH) and (+)-amphetamine (AMP), a pharmacologically active metabolite, in pigeons (n=6) after intramuscular (i.m.) and intravenous (i.v.) dosing (0.8 mg/kg). LC-MS/MS analysis was used to determine serum concentrations of METH and AMP. A modified crossover design was used to determine the bioavailability, time to maximum concentration, total clearance, the volume of distribution, the maximal concentration, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and terminal elimination half-life for METH. The route of administration did not significantly affect these pharmacokinetic parameters. The time to maximum concentration for METH and AMP following i.m. administration was 0.3 h. Maximum AMP serum concentrations were achieved in 2 h, irrespective of the route of administration, and these concentrations remained essentially constant for an additional 6 h. The metabolism of METH to AMP was not affected by the route of administration, and the molar ratio AMP to METH AUC values were the same (i.v.=0.57; i.m.=0.41). These results show that METH pharmacokinetics after i.m. administration in the pigeon are similar to i.v. administration. Thus i.m. is a reasonable route of administration for METH behavioral assays in the pigeon if sufficient time for absorption is given following the dose, and the behavioral endpoint is not dependent on the rapid input of METH following an i.v. dose.

Effects of anti-phencyclidine and anti-(+)-methamphetamine monoclonal antibodies alone and in combination on the discrimination of phencyclidine and (+)-methamphetamine by pigeons.

RATIONALE: Drug-specific monoclonal antibodies against phencyclidine (PCP) and (+)-methamphetamine [(+)-METH] should bind to these drugs to block their discriminative stimulus effects. OBJECTIVES: To determine if mouse monoclonal antibodies against PCP and (+)-METH can block the discriminative stimulus effects of the drugs in pigeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pigeons were trained to discriminate among intramuscular injections of saline, 1 mg/kg PCP, and 2 mg/kg (+)-METH. After responding stabilized, cumulative dose-response curves were obtained for PCP and (+)-METH. Doses of an anti-PCP antibody at 620 mg/kg (anti-PCP mAb6B5) with a K (D) of 1.3 nM for PCP and no measurable affinity for (+)-METH and 1,000 mg/kg doses of anti-(+)-METH antibody (anti-METH mAb6H7) with a K (D) of 41 nM for (+)-METH and no measurable affinity for PCP were subsequently administered, first alone and later in combination after which the dose-response curves were redetermined. RESULTS: When the antibodies were given alone, the anti-PCP antibody blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of PCP, but not those of (+)-METH, and the anti-(+)-METH antibody blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-METH, but not those of PCP. The anti-PCP antibody shifted the PCP dose-response curve further to the right and for a longer time than the anti-(+)-METH antibody shifted the dose response curve for (+)-METH. When the anti-PCP and anti-(+)-METH antibodies were administered on the same day, the discriminative stimulus effects of both drugs were completely blocked 1 day after antibody administration. CONCLUSIONS: These experiments demonstrate the high specificity of the antibodies for the drugs to which they bind and show that monoclonal antibodies can be combined to antagonize the effects of more than one drug.

Effects of amphetamine-CNS depressant combinations and of other CNS stimulants in four-choice drug discriminations.

Three pigeons were trained to discriminate among 5 mg/kg pentobarbital, 2 mg/kg amphetamine, a combination of these two drugs at these doses, and saline using a four-choice procedure (amphetamine-pentobarbital group). Three other pigeons were trained to discriminate among 5 mg/kg morphine, 2 mg/kg methamphetamine, a combination of these two drugs at these doses, and saline (methamphetamine-morphine group). After 10 to 13 months of training, the pigeons averaged more than 90% of their responses on the appropriate key during training sessions. In subsequent testing, dose-response curves were determined for the individual drugs, for a wide range of dose combinations of the training drugs, and for two drugs to which the pigeons had not been exposed previously (pseudoephedrine and nicotine). After low test doses of the training drugs, pigeons responded on the saline key. As the dose increased, responding on the key associated with that drug during training sessions increased. When training drugs were combined at doses that were not discriminable when given alone, responding occurred on the saline key. When a discriminable dose of one training drug was combined with a nondiscriminable dose of the other training drug, responding occurred on the key associated with the discriminable dose. When both drugs were given at discriminable doses, responding almost always occurred on the drug-combination key. The response-rate decreasing effects of pentobarbital and amphetamine were mutually antagonized when the drugs were combined, but the rate-decreasing effects of morphine and methamphetamine were not. After low doses of pseudoephedrine and nicotine, pigeons in both groups responded on the saline key. After higher doses of pseudoephedrine and nicotine, responding in the amphetamine-pentobarbital group occurred primarily on the amphetamine key. In the methamphetamine-morphine group, higher doses of pseudoephedrine and especially nicotine engendered more responding on the combination key than had occurred in the other group. The four-choice procedure can reveal subtle effects in the discrimination of individual drugs and drug combinations that are not apparent with procedures offering fewer response alternatives.

Effectiveness of payment for reduced carbon monoxide levels and noncontingent payments on smoking behaviors in cocaine-abusing outpatients wearing nicotine or placebo patches.

In a 2-week intervention to reduce cigarette smoking among outpatients in treatment for cocaine addiction, 20 subjects were randomly assigned to a contingent group, receiving monetary vouchers for breath samples with carbon monoxide (CO) levels of 8 ppm or less, or to a noncontingent group, receiving vouchers regardless of CO level. Subjects wore either nicotine or placebo patches in a randomized crossover design. Contingent subjects had significantly lower CO levels and met the 8 ppm target significantly more often than did noncontingent subjects; however, number of cigarettes reported smoked did not differ between groups. Use of nicotine patches resulted in CO levels significantly lower than did use of placebo patches, but levels still exceeded 8 ppm regardless of type of patch. Because contingent reward helped cocaine-dependent smokers achieve nonsmoking CO targets, behavioral antismoking interventions merit continued study in similar populations.

Effects of murine-derived anti-methamphetamine monoclonal antibodies on (+)-methamphetamine self-administration in the rat.

Two murine-derived anti-methamphetamine monoclonal antibodies were studied as potential pharmacokinetic antagonists of (+)-methamphetamine self-administration by rats. Intravenous administration of a 1 g/kg dose of the lower affinity [antibody equilibrium dissociation constant (K(d)) = 250 nM] monoclonal antibody (mAb) designated mAb6H8, 1 day before the start of several daily 2-h self-administration sessions produced effects that depended on the dose of (+)-methamphetamine. mAb6H8 increased the rate of self-administration of a unit dose of 0.06 mg/kg (+)-methamphetamine, had little effect on the rate of self-administration of a unit dose of 0.03 mg/kg (+)methamphetamine, and lowered the rate of self-administration of a unit dose of 0.01 mg/kg (+)-methamphetamine to a level similar to that after saline substitution. mAb-induced changes in rates of self-administration occurred very early in self-administration sessions and lasted for 3 to 7 days. Intravenous administration of a 1 or a 0.6 g/kg dose of a higher affinity (K(d) = 11 nM) mAb designated mAb6H4, 24 h before the first of several self-administration sessions, produced very similar effects to the lower affinity mAb, despite the more than 20-fold greater affinity for (+)-methamphetamine. It is proposed that these anti-methamphetamine antibodies bind some of the self-administered (+)-methamphetamine before it can penetrate into brain, thereby reducing the amount of free drug available to function as a reinforcer. Although neither of these mAb medications are optimal antibodies for treating (+)-methamphetamine abuse, the experiments demonstrate that anti-(+)-methamphetamine monoclonal antibodies can attenuate the self-administration of the drug and suggest the potential of using monoclonal antibodies as pharmacokinetic antagonists of (+)-methamphetamine.

The discrimination of drug mixtures using a four-choice procedure in pigeons.

RATIONALE: The purpose of these experiments was to study drug combinations as discriminative stimuli using a new four-choice procedure. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether pigeons could discriminate among a mixture of two drugs, each of the component drugs and saline, and to study other drug combinations in these birds. METHODS: Pigeons were trained to discriminate among saline, 5 mg/kg morphine, 5 mg/kg pentobarbital, and a mixture of these two doses using a four-choice procedure. RESULTS: When responding stabilized, the birds responded on the correct key more than 90% of the time. Low doses of all drugs given alone produced responding on the saline key. Higher doses of pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide produced responding on the pentobarbital key, and higher doses of morphine produced responses on the morphine key. Methamphetamine produced responding on the saline key. None of the drugs given alone produced responding on the mixture key. When pentobarbital was combined with morphine, doses both below and above the combined training doses of these drugs usually produced responding on the mixture key. The combination of chlordiazepoxide with morphine produced similar results. Combinations of methamphetamine with pentobarbital or with morphine produced effects similar to those of pentobarbital or morphine given alone. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of combinations of pentobarbital and morphine, or chlordiazepoxide and morphine produce responding on the mixture key, even though the pigeons were not exposed to these dose combinations during training. The four-choice procedure provides the opportunity to study drug mixtures in a detail not possible with more limited response choices.

Pharmacokinetic antagonism of (+)-methamphetamine discrimination by a low-affinity monoclonal anti-methamphetamine antibody.

Animals were trained to discriminate 5 or 10 mg/kg cocaine (rats), or 3 mg/kg (+)-amphetamine (pigeons) from saline, after which dose-response curves were determined for (+)-methamphetamine and other drugs before and after administration of a (+)-methamphetamine-specific monoclonal antibody (K(D) =250 nM). In rats trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline, intravenous (+)-methamphetamine was about three times more potent as a discriminative stimulus than intraperitoneal (+)-methamphetamine. Also in these rats, intraperitoneal (+)-methamphetamine and (+)-amphetamine were about equipotent as discriminative stimuli, and were about three times more potent than intraperitoneal cocaine. In pigeons trained to discriminate 3 mg/kg intramuscular (i.m.) (+)-amphetamine from saline, (+)-methamphetamine and (+)-amphetamine were nearly equipotent, while cocaine was slightly less potent. In rats trained to discriminate 5 or 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline, intravenous administration of 1 g/kg of the antibody shifted both intravenous and intraperitoneal dose-response curves for (+)-methamphetamine discrimination approximately threefold to the right at 1 or 4 days after administration of the antibody. In pigeons trained to discriminate 3 mg/kg intramuscular (+)-amphetamine from saline, a similar shift of the (+)-methamphetamine dose-response curve to the right also lasted for 4-7 days. However, the antibody did not affect the (+)-amphetamine dose-response curve (pigeons), or the cocaine (rats) dose-response curve. The data show that a low affinity anti-(+)-methamphetamine-specific antibody can produce a specific antagonism of an effect of (+)-methamphetamine that is closely associated with its abuse.

Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.

Pigeons were trained to discriminate 5 mg/kg pentobarbital from saline under concurrent variable-ratio (VR) VR schedules, in which responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever were reinforced under the VR schedule with the smaller response requirements when pentobarbital was given before the session, and responses on the saline-biased key were reinforced under the VR schedule with the larger response requirements. When saline was administered before the session, the reinforcement contingencies associated with the two response keys were reversed. When responding stabilized under concurrent VR 20 VR 30, concurrent VR 10 VR 40, or concurrent VR 5 VR 50 schedules, pigeons responded almost exclusively on the key on which fewer responses were required to produce the reinforcer. When other doses of pentobarbital and other drugs were substituted for the training dose, low doses of all drugs produced responding on the saline-biased key. Higher doses of pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide produced responding only on the pentobarbital-biased key, whereas higher doses of ethanol and phencyclidine produced responding only on this key less often. d-Amphetamine produced responding primarily on the saline-biased key. When drugs generalized to pentobarbital, the shape of the generalization curve under concurrent VR VR schedules was more often graded than quantal in shape. Thus, drug discrimination can be established under concurrent VR VR schedules, but the shapes of drug-discrimination dose-response curves under concurrent VR VR schedules more closely resemble those seen under interval schedules than those seen under fixed-ratio schedules. Graded dose-response curves under concurrent VR VR schedules may relate to probability matching and difficulty in discriminating differences in reinforcement frequency.

LAD rats learn a three-key drug discrimination more rapidly and achieve a higher level of performance than HAD rats.

High-alcohol drinking (HAD1) and low-alcohol drinking (LAD1) rats were trained to discriminate among 0.75 g/kg ethanol, 1.5 g/kg ethanol and saline under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule. LAD rats learned the discrimination more rapidly than HAD rats, and asymptotic performance by LAD rats was better than that of HAD rats. The 0.75 g/kg dose of ethanol failed to control the responding of HAD rats, both when baseline responding stabilized and during the determination of an ethanol dose-response curve. These differences between LAD and HAD rats in ethanol discrimination were not observed in previous experiments using a two-choice procedure. The three-choice procedure may be useful for establishing strain differences in ethanol discrimination. These and previous experiments with alcohol-preferring rats suggest that the learning of an ethanol discrimination may be dissociable from voluntary ethanol consumption in rat strains bred selectively to consume ethanol.

Discrimination of pentobarbital doses and drug mixtures under fixed-ratio and fixed-interval reinforcement schedules.

Pigeons were trained to discriminate among 5 mg/kg pentobarbital, 10mg/kg pentobarbital, and saline, under either fixed-interval (FI) or fixed-ratio (FR) reinforcement schedules. When baseline responding stabilized, a higher percentage of responses occurred on the key that produced the reinforcer under the FR schedule than under the FI schedule. After low doses of pentobarbital, responding shifted from the saline key to the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key; at higher doses of pentobarbital responding shifted to the 10mg/kg pentobarbital key under both schedules. After low doses of ethanol and chlordiazepoxide, responding shifted from the saline key to the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key, but after high doses of these drugs, responding continued to occur on the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key under both reinforcement schedules. A 5 mg/kg dose of pentobarbital increased responding on the 10 mg/kg pentobarbital key when it was combined with pentobarbital, ethanol or chlordiazepoxide. Phencyclidine and D-amphetamine produced responding largely on the saline key under both reinforcement schedules. Under the FR schedule, pentobarbital dose-response curves were usually quantal, whereas under the FI schedule the pentobarbital dose-response curves usually were graded.

Implementation of a clinic policy of client-regulated methadone dosing.

A six-month interval (baseline) during which methadone doses above 99 mg required individual approval by the clinic's physician was compared with the subsequent 16-month period in which a policy of patient-regulated methadone dosing with no preset upper limit was implemented. During the later phase, all patients were required to remain at each selected dose for a minimum of four days, and standard compliance-based take-home dosing procedures were followed. For patients in the study sample (n=57), the daily maximum methadone dose increased from 165 mg during baseline to 300 mg during the self-regulation period, while their average daily methadone dose increased from 76.84 mg to 80.04 mg (W=473, n=57, p=0.01). Monthly percent of opiate-positive urine specimens decreased significantly from 5.26% during baseline to 1.64% during the self-regulated dose period (W=169, n=57, p<0.01), and use of other drugs remained unchanged. No patient failed to show possession of recalled take-home doses, and no instances of liquid methadone diversion were reported by law enforcement agencies in the area.

Schedule control of quantal and graded dose-effect curves in a drug-drug-saline discrimination.

Pigeons were trained to discriminate among 5 mg/kg pentobarbital, 5 mg/kg morphine, and saline when responding was maintained under fixed-interval (FI) or fixed-ratio (FR) reinforcement schedules. After the discrimination was established, other drugs were substituted for the training drugs. After low doses of pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide, responding shifted from the saline key to the pentobarbital key under both FR and FI schedules. After low doses of morphine and methadone, responding shifted from the saline key to the morphine key under both reinforcement schedules. After all doses of d-amphetamine, responding occurred largely on the saline key under both schedules. Responding also was confined largely to the saline key after phencyclidine administration under the FR schedule, but under the FI schedule, responding shifted from the saline key to the pentobarbital key at high doses of phencyclidine. When responding was maintained under the FR schedule, the dose-response curves for drugs that generalized to the training drugs were quantal in shape, while under the FI schedule, the dose-response curves for drugs that generalized to the training drugs were graded. These data extend observations that FR schedules generate quantal dose-response curves, and FI schedules generate graded dose-response curves to complex three-key drug discriminations.

Four-choice drug discrimination in pigeons.

(+)Amphetamine was added as a training stimulus for pigeons previously trained to discriminate among pentobarbital, morphine and saline using a three-choice procedure. Pigeons quickly learned the four-choice drug discrimination. Generalization from the training drugs was similar to that established with simpler drug discriminations; pentobarbital generalized to chlordiazepoxide, morphine generalized to methadone, and (+)amphetamine generalized to cocaine and methamphetamine. Low doses of phencyclidine generalized to saline, while higher doses partially generalized to pentobarbital and (+)amphetamine. When dose-response curves were redetermined with a cumulative-dosing procedure, the same pattern of generalization occurred as under single-dose procedures. Dose-response curves were quantal under both the single-dose and the cumulative-dosing procedures. The four-choice procedure offers some important advantages for studying the discriminative stimulus effects of drugs that interact with multiple receptor subtypes and for studying drug mixtures.

Drug discrimination under two concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedules.

Pigeons were trained to discriminate 5.0 mg/kg pentobarbital from saline under a two-key concurrent fixed-interval (FI) 100-s FI 200-s schedule of food presentation, and later tinder a concurrent FI 40-s FI 80-s schedule, in which the FI component with the shorter time requirement reinforced responding on one key after drug administration (pentobarbital-biased key) and on the other key after saline administration (saline-biased key). After responding stabilized under the concurrent FI 100-s FI 200-s schedule, pigeons earned an average of 66% (after pentobarbital) to 68% (after saline) of their reinforcers for responding under the FI 100-s component of the concurrent schedule. These birds made an average of 70% of their responses on both the pentobarbital-biased key after the training dose of pentobarbital and the saline-biased key after saline. After responding stabilized under the concurrent FI 40-s FI 80-s schedule, pigeons earned an average of 67% of their reinforcers for responding under the FI 40 component after both saline and the training dose of pentobarbital. These birds made an average of 75% of their responses on the pentobarbital-biased key after the training dose of pentobarbital, but only 55% of their responses on the saline-biased key after saline. In test sessions preceded by doses of pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, ethanol, phencyclidine, or methamphetamine, the dose-response curves were similar under these two concurrent schedules. Pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, and ethanol produced dose-dependent increases in responding on the pentobarbital-biased key as the doses increased. For some birds, at the highest doses of these drugs, the dose-response curve turned over. Increasing doses of phencyclidine produced increased responding on the pentobarbital-biased key in some, but not all, birds. After methamphetamine, responding was largely confined to the saline-biased key. These data show that pigeons can perform drug discriminations under concurrent schedules in which the reinforcement frequency under the schedule components differs only by a factor of two, and that when other drugs are substituted for the training drugs they produce dose-response curves similar to the curves produced by these drugs under other concurrent interval schedules.

Drug discrimination in rats under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules.

Eight rats were trained to discriminate pentobarbital from saline under a concurrent variable-interval (VI) VI schedule, on which responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital were reinforced under VI 20 s and responses on the saline-biased lever were reinforced under VI 80 s. After saline, the reinforcement contingencies programmed on the two levers were reversed. The rats made 62.3% of their responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital and 72.2% on the saline-biased lever after saline, both of which are lower than predicted by the matching law. When the schedule was changed to concurrent VI 50 s VI 50 s for test sessions with saline and the training dose of pentobarbital, responding on the pentobarbital-biased lever after the training dose of pentobarbital and on the saline-biased lever after saline became nearly equal, even during the first 2 min of the session, suggesting that the presence or absence of the training drug was exerting minimal control over responding and making the determination of dose-effect relations of drugs difficult to interpret. When the pentobarbital dose-response curve was determined under the concurrent VI 50-s VI 50-s schedule, responding was fairly evenly distributed on both levers for most rats. Therefore, 6 additional rats were trained to respond under a concurrent VI 60-s VI 240-s schedule. Under this schedule, the rats made 62.6% of their responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital and 73.5% of their responses on the saline-biased lever after saline, which also is lower than the percentages predicted by perfect matching. When the schedule was changed to a concurrent VI 150-s VI 150-s schedule for 5-min test sessions with additional drugs, the presence or absence of pentobarbital continued to control responding in most rats, and it was possible to generate graded dose-response curves for pentobarbital and other drugs using the data from these 5-min sessions. The dose-response curves generated under these conditions were similar to the dose-response curves generated using other reinforcement schedules and other species.

Effect of drugs on response-duration differentiation VII: response-force requirements.

Rats were trained to press a lever for at least 1 s but for less than 1.3 s. The force required to press the lever was then increased or decreased by 10, 15, or 20 g. Increases in the force requirements for lever pressing decreased timing accuracy, but decreases in the force requirement had the opposite effect. Accuracy decreases at increasing force requirements were characterized by an increase in the relative frequency of responses that were too short to meet the reinforcement criterion. In contrast, increases in accuracy when the force requirements were decreased were characterized by increases in response durations that met the reinforcement criterion and decreases in the relative frequency of responses that were too short to produce the reinforcer. Phencyclidine (PCP) and methamphetamine produced dose-dependent decreases in accuracy that were associated primarily with increases in the relative frequency of short response durations, although methamphetamine also produced increases in long response durations at some doses. When the effects of PCP were determined with the force requirement increased by 10 g or decreased by 15 g, the cumulative response-duration distribution shifted toward even shorter response durations. When the effects of methamphetamine were determined with the force requirement on the lever increased by 10 g, the cumulative frequency distribution was shifted toward shorter response durations to about the same extent as it had been before force requirements increased; however, when the force required to press the lever was decreased by 15 g, these shifts toward shorter response durations almost completely disappeared. These results show that increases and decreases in the force requirements for lever pressing have different effects on the accuracy of temporal response differentiation.

Differences between alcohol-preferring and alcohol-nonpreferring rats in ethanol generalization.

Alcohol-preferring (P rats) and alcohol-nonpreferring rats (NP rats) were trained to discriminate intraperitoneal injections of 0.5 g/kg ethanol, or subcutaneous injections of 0.6 mg/kg nicotine from saline. P rats learned the ethanol discrimination more rapidly and made a higher percentage (88%) of their responses on the ethanol lever after ethanol and a lower percentage (7%) after saline than NP rats (78 and 15%, respectively). In substitution tests, increasing doses of ethanol produced increases in the percentage of responses on the ethanol lever with similar ED50s (0.43 and 0.44 g/kg) in P and NP rats. P rats trained to discriminate ethanol from saline made more responses on the ethanol lever after nicotine (80%) and d-amphetamine (63%) than NP rats (33 and 40%). The ethanol stimulus did not generalize to morphine in either P or NP rats. NP rats trained to discriminate ethanol from saline responded more on the ethanol lever after bupropion (77%) than P rats (49%). In rats trained to discriminate nicotine from saline, the nicotine discriminative stimulus did not generalize to ethanol in either P or NP rats, suggesting that the genetic difference in the stimulus generalization of ethanol was not symmetrical.

Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-ratio fixed-ratio schedule.

Pigeons were trained to discriminate 5.0 mg/kg pentobarbital from saline under a two-key concurrent fixed-ratio 10 fixed-ratio 40 schedule of food presentation, in which the fixed-ratio component with the lower response requirement was programmed to reinforce responding on one key after drug administration (pentobarbital-biased key) and on the other key after saline administration (saline-biased key). After responding stabilized, pigeons averaged 98% of their responses on the pentobarbital-biased key during training sessions preceded by pentobarbital, and they averaged 90% of their responses on the saline-biased key during training sessions preceded by saline. In test sessions preceded by doses of pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, or ethanol, pigeons switched from responding on the saline-biased key at low doses to responding on the pentobarbital-biased key at higher doses (the dose-response curve was quantal). High doses of phencyclidine produced responding on both keys, whereas pigeons responded almost exclusively on the saline-biased key after all doses of methamphetamine. These and previous experiments using concurrent reinforcement schedules to study drug discrimination illustrate that the schedule of reinforcement is an important determinant of the shape of dose-effect curves in drug-discrimination experiments.