All Pedicle Screw versus Hybrid Hook-Screw Instrumentation in the Treatment of Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Background: Posterior spinal correction and fusion remains the most common surgical treatment in AIS. Surgeons currently favour all pedicle screw (AS) correction techniques with alternative implants being less utilised. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a hybrid hook−screw (HS) construct could achieve similar outcomes. Methods: A single centre, prospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with moderate and severe thoracic AIS (Lenke 1) were included. Clinical and radiological results of a standardised hybrid HS technique were compared with those obtained with an AS construct. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Results: 160 patients were included in this series (80 patients/group). The HS group had significantly reduced surgical time, blood loss and implant density. Both techniques achieved ≥75% scoliosis correction. The HS group was superior in restoring thoracic kyphosis and global sagittal balance with an average 31% increase in kyphosis compared to 10% with the AS group (p < 0.001). There was significant improvement in SRS-22 scores at 2 years postoperative (p < 0.001) in both groups. There were no neurological or visceral complications related to instrumentation, no detected non-union and no reoperations. The HS implant cost was significantly lower than that of AS, with a mean instrumentation saving of almost £2000/patient. Conclusion: A standardised hybrid HS technique achieved excellent correction of thoracic scoliosis, high patient satisfaction and low complication rates in patients with thoracic AIS. These results were comparable to the AS group. The HS technique achieved better correction of thoracic kyphosis and sagittal balance than the AS technique, together with reduced surgical time, blood loss and implant cost.

Midterm clinical and radiologic survivorship of a stemless total shoulder arthroplasty.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of stemless total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients with glenohumeral arthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of all patients who underwent a TSA with Affinis Short prosthesis during the period 2010-2017. Seventy-two TSAs were performed within our unit, in 62 patients (45 females and 17 males), with 10 patients having bilateral TSAs with this prosthesis. The mean follow-up was 3.9 years (2-8.7 years). Patients were evaluated clinically with the Oxford Shoulder Score, range of movement assessment, and a numerical patient satisfaction score. Follow-up radiographs were evaluated by 2 reviewers assessing for lucency and assigned a Lazarus grade. RESULTS: Six patients were lost to follow-up prior to their 2-year review. At last follow-up, the mean forward elevation was 157° (80°-180°), abduction was 150° (60°-180°), and external rotation was 39° (20°-60°). The mode internal rotation was to the lumbar spine, with 95% of patients achieving internal rotation to L5 or higher. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score was 45 (18-48). The mean patient satisfaction score was 4.93/5. No humeral lucencies were observed. Sixty-four percent (n=47) of the glenoids were Lazarus grade 0, showing no evidence of radiolucency. The remaining patients were Lazarus grade 1-3, although none were progressive and all patients were asymptomatic. No patients were revised for aseptic loosening. Four patients underwent revision: 1 for infection, 1 for heterotrophic ossification and stiffness, and 2 for rotator cuff failure. CONCLUSION: Midterm follow-up results indicate good clinical and radiologic survivorship for this stemless TSA. Our findings suggest good patient function and satisfaction, and no patients have required revision for aseptic loosening. Further follow-up is required to determine long-term survivorship.

Diagnosing acute compartment syndrome-where have we got to?

PURPOSE: Acute compartment syndrome is a condition whereby tissue ischaemia occurs due to increased pressure in a closed myofascial compartment. It is a surgical emergency, with rapid recognition and treatment-the keys to good outcomes. METHODS: The available literature on diagnostic aids was reviewed by one of the senior authors 15 years ago. Now, we have further reviewed the literature, to aim to ascertain what progress has been made. RESULTS: In this review, we present the evidence around a variety of available diagnostic options when investigating a potential case of acute compartment syndrome, including those looking at pressure changes, localised oxygenation, perfusion, metabolic changes and available blood serum biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: A significant amount of work has been put into developing modalities of diagnosis for acute compartment syndrome in the last 15 years. There is a lot of promising outcomes being reported; however, there is yet to be any conclusive evidence to suggest that they should be used over intracompartmental pressure measurement, which remains the gold standard. However, clinicians should be cognizant that compartment pressure monitoring lacks diagnostic specificity, and could lead to unnecessary fasciotomy when used as the sole criterion for diagnosis. Therefore, pressure monitoring is ideally used in situations where clinical suspicion is raised.

Avoiding and Managing Complications After Hip Fracture Fixation.

There is an enormous burden of disease associated with the management of a failed hip fracture fixation. The goal of surgical management is to facilitate an early return to mobilization with the retention of as much independence as possible. Despite numerous studies that are focused on the care of patients with proximal femur fractures, complication rates remain high. Surgeons should review current strategies to avoid and manage complications after hip fracture fixation. This will have important implications given the detrimental consequences of failed management of hip fractures, including permanent disability, life-threatening medical complications, and an increased risk of death.

Primary and Secondary Total Knee Arthroplasty for Tibial Plateau Fractures.

The surgical management of tibial plateau fractures can be technically demanding. In younger patients, the mainstay is fixation with cartilage preservation. In older patients with osteoporotic bone, this method has higher rates of fixation failure; in addition, it requires prolonged bed rest or protected weight bearing, which are major challenges in this group. In contrast, total knee arthroplasty performed acutely for primary treatment of tibial plateau fractures has potential advantages for elderly patients, such as immediate stability, early mobilization, and positive functional outcomes with decreased rates of reoperation. Additionally, arthroplasty can be technically challenging in younger patients with previous tibial plateau fractures in whom debilitating posttraumatic arthritis develops. In these patients, old wounds, retained metalwork, bony deficiency, and instability can lead to poorer outcomes and higher complication rates than in routine knee arthroplasty. In both cases, we recommend surgery be performed by experienced arthroplasty surgeons with ample access to a range of implants with varying constraints and the option of stems and augments.

Primary screw perforation or subsequent screw cut-out following proximal humerus fracture fixation using locking plates: a review of causative factors and proposed solutions.

The surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures remains controversial primarily due to the high complication rate associated with the available fixation methods. In an attempt to reduce the incidence of serious complications and subsequent poor clinical outcomes, proximal humerus locking plates have become popular but even these implants cannot overcome the risk of complications, especially those associated with loss of fracture reduction and screw cut-out/migration through the humeral head. In an attempt to address these issues, we have reviewed the literature, investigating the most likely causes for these predominantly mechanical complications and propose technical solutions.

Technical considerations to avoid delayed and non-union.

For many years intramedullary nails have been a well accepted and successful method of diaphyseal fracture fixation. However, delayed and non unions with this technique do still occur and are associated with significant patient morbidity. The reason for this can be multi-factorial. We discuss a number of technical considerations to maximise fracture reduction, fracture stability and fracture vascularity in order to achieve bony union.