Does Cardiac Catheterization Facilitate Hemodynamic Optimization of Pediatric Patients on Continuous-Flow Ventricular Assist Devices?

Understanding optimal ventricular assist device (VAD) parameters for pediatric patients is valuable given the inherent issue of patient-device size mismatch and heterogeneous cardiac anatomy in children. We evaluated our center's experience of continuous-flow VAD (CF-VAD) optimization using cardiac catheterization. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients on CF-VAD support who underwent hemodynamic heart catheterization from 2013 to 2018. Fifteen patients had 16 hemodynamic catheterizations performed. The indications for hemodynamic optimization by catheterization included clinical signs of heart failure while on CF-VAD (9 of 16, 56%), pretransplant evaluation of pulmonary hypertension (2 of 16, 13%), or assessment of myocardial recovery (5 of 16, 31%). The median age at catheterization was 12 years (interquartile range: 8-16). Median baseline speed of device was 2333 ± 253 rotations per minute. The goal was to find the speed at which optimal hemodynamics were achieved, defined by low wedge pressure with an acceptable central venous pressure. Of the 16 catheterizations, there were 9 (56%) speed increases to achieve optimal hemodynamics and 5 (33%) speed decreases for hemodynamic optimization or for potential explant. The speed was not changed in 2 (13%) catheterizations as the patients were determined to be at an optimal hemodynamic state. Overall, VAD settings were optimized in 75% (14 of 16) of hemodynamic catheterizations. There were no adverse events related to catheterization. Thus, we conclude that catheterization-based hemodynamic assessment is safe and effective for optimizing VAD speed and provides guidance on medical management in children supported on CF-VAD.

"Compassionate" Cases of the Jarvik 2015 Ventricular Assist Device.

The Jarvik 2015 Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) (Jarvik Inc, New York, NY) is the first and currently only continuous-flow VAD specifically designed for small children, and it is being evaluated in the so-called Pump for Kids, Infants, and Neonates (PumpKIN) trial. Due to the strict inclusion criteria of the trial, there have been a group of patients who failed to meet the criteria and therefore received the Jarvik 2015 VAD under the designation of "compassionate use." This is the same phenomenon seen previously during the Berlin Heart EXCOR trial. While we await the results of the PumpKIN trial, which will report the device performance in a strictly selected population, the compassionate use cases represent actual "real world" experiences. We describe herein our experience of two compassionate use cases. In particular, this report has a special emphasis on the power consumption and hemolysis and inflammatory lab profile of the Jarvik 2015 VAD as hemocompatibility was the primary focus of the developmental and the preclinical phases.