Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758627

ABSTRACT

This work proposes a novel method of temporal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) guided adaptive acoustic output adjustment and demonstrates this approach during in vivo fetal imaging. Acoustic output adjustment is currently the responsibility of sonographers, but ultrasound safety studies show recommended ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) practices are inconsistently followed. This study explores an automated ALARA method that adjusts the Mechanical Index (MI) output, targeting imaging conditions matching the temporal noise perception threshold. A 28 dB threshold SNR is used as the target SNR, following prior work showing relevant noise quantities are imperceptible once this image data quality level is reached. After implementing adaptive output adjustment on a clinical system, the average MI required to achieve 28 dB SNR in an eleven-volunteer fetal abdomen imaging test ranged from 0.17 to 0.26. The higher MI levels were required when imaging at higher frequencies. During tests with 20-second MI adjustment imaging periods, the degree of motion impacted the adaptive performance. For stationary imaging views, target SNR levels were maintained in 90% of SNR evaluations. When scanning between targets the imaging conditions were more variable, but the target SNR was still maintained in 71% of the evaluations. Given the relatively low MI recommended when performing MI adjustment and the successful adjustment of MI in response to changing imaging conditions, these results encourage adoption of adaptive acoustic output approaches guided by temporal SNR.

2.
Ultrason Imaging ; 46(3): 151-163, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497455

ABSTRACT

This work measures temporal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) thresholds that indicate when random noise during ultrasound scanning becomes imperceptible to expert human observers. Visible noise compromises image quality and can potentially lead to non-diagnostic scans. Noise can arise from both stable acoustic sources (clutter) or randomly varying electronic sources (temporal noise). Extensive engineering effort has focused on decreasing noise in both of these categories. In this work, an observer study with five practicing sonographers was performed to assess sonographer sensitivity to temporal noise in ultrasound cine clips. Understanding the conditions where temporal noise is no longer visible during ultrasound imaging can inform engineering efforts seeking to minimize the impact this noise has on image quality. The sonographers were presented with paired temporal noise-free and noise-added simulated speckle cine clips and asked to select the noise-added clips. The degree of motion in the imaging target was found to have a significant effect on the SNR levels where noise was perceived, while changing imaging frequency had little impact. At realistic in vivo motion levels, temporal noise was not perceived in cine clips at and above 28 dB SNR. In a case study presented here, the potential of adaptive intensity adjustment based on this noise perception threshold is validated in a fetal imaging scenario. This study demonstrates how noise perception thresholds can be applied to help design or tune ultrasound systems for different imaging tasks and noise conditions.


Subject(s)
Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Ultrasonography , Humans , Ultrasonography/methods , Observer Variation , Female
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35507609

ABSTRACT

The objective of this work was to develop an automated region of the interest selection method to use for adaptive imaging. The as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle is the recommended framework for setting the output level of diagnostic ultrasound devices, but studies suggest that it is not broadly observed. One way to address this would be to adjust output settings automatically based on image quality feedback, but a missing link is determining how and where to interrogate the image quality. This work provides a method of region of interest selection based on standard, envelope-detected image data that are readily available on ultrasound scanners. Image brightness, the standard deviation of the brightness values, the speckle signal-to-noise ratio, and frame-to-frame correlation were considered as image characteristics to serve as the basis for this selection method. Region selection with these filters was compared to results from image quality assessment at multiple acoustic output levels. After selecting the filter values based on data from 25 subjects, testing on ten reserved subjects' data produced a positive predictive value of 94% using image brightness, the speckle signal-to-noise ratio, and frame-to-frame correlation. The best case filter values for using only image brightness and speckle signal-to-noise ratio had a positive predictive value of 97%. These results suggest that these simple methods of filtering could select reliable regions of interest during live scanning to facilitate adaptive ALARA imaging.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Humans , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Ultrasonography/methods
4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 34(11): 1805-1813, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31352874

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) is operator dependent, requiring operator skill and experience to selectively identify and record planes of interest for subsequent interpretation. This limits the utility of US in settings in which expert sonographers are unavailable. Three-dimensional (3D) US acquisition of an anatomic target, which enables reconstruction of any plane through the acquired volume, might reduce operator dependence by providing any desired image plane for interpretation, without identification of target planes of interest at the time of acquisition. We applied a low-cost 3DUS technology because of the wider potential application compared with dedicated 3DUS systems. We chose second trimester fetal biometric parameters for study because of their importance in maternal-fetal health globally. We hypothesized that expert and novice interpretations of novice-acquired 3D volumes would not differ from each other nor from expert measurements of expert-acquired 2D images, the clinical reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, blinded, observational study. Expert sonographers blinded to 3DUS volumes acquired 2DUS images of second trimester fetuses from 32 subjects, and expert readers performed interpretation, during usual care. A novice sonographer blinded to other clinical data acquired oriented 3DUS image volumes of the same subjects on the same date. Expert readers blinded to other data assessed placental location (PL), fetal presentation (FP), and amniotic fluid volume (AFV) in novice-acquired 3D volumes. Novice and expert raters blinded to other data independently measured biparietal diameter (BPD), humerus length (HL), and femur length (FL) for each fetus from novice-acquired 3D volumes. Corresponding gestational age (GA) estimates were calculated. Inter-rater reliability of measurements and GAs (expert 3D versus expert 2D, novice 3D versus expert 2D, and expert 3D versus novice 3D) were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Mean inter-rater measurement differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: 3D volume acquisition and reconstruction required mean 30.4 s (±5.7) and 70.0 s (±24.0), respectively. PL, FP, and AFV were evaluated from volumes for all subjects; mean time for evaluation was 16 s (±0.0). PL, FP, and AFV could be evaluated for all subjects. At least one biometric measurement was possible for 31 subjects (97%). Agreement between rater pairs for a composite of all measures was excellent (ICCs ≥ 0.95), and for individual measures was good to excellent (ICCs ≥ 0.75). Inter-rater differences were not significant (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Expert and novice interpretations of novice-acquired 3DUS volumes of second trimester fetuses provided reliable biometric measures compared with expert interpretation of expert-acquired 2DUS images. 3DUS volume acquisition with a low-cost system may reduce operator dependence of ultrasound.


Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Placenta/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
5.
J Ultrasound Med ; 2020 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33289152

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound users are advised to observe the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle, but studies have shown that most do not monitor acoustic output metrics. We developed an adaptive ultrasound method that could suggest acoustic output levels based on real-time image quality feedback using lag-one coherence (LOC). METHODS: Lag-one coherence as a function of the mechanical index (MI) was assessed in 35 healthy volunteers in their second trimester of pregnancy. While imaging the placenta or the fetal abdomen, the system swept through 16 MI values ranging from 0.15 to 1.20. The LOC-versus-MI data were fit with a sigmoid curve, and the ALARA MI was selected as the point at which the fit reached 98% of its maximum. RESULTS: In this study, the ALARA MI values were between 0.35 and 1.03, depending on the acoustic window. Compared to a default MI of 0.8, the pilot acquisitions suggested a lower ALARA MI 80% of the time. The contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio, generalized contrast-to-noise ratio, and LOC all followed sigmoidal trends with an increasing MI. The R2 of the fit was statistically significantly greater for LOC than the other metrics (P < .017). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that maximum image quality can be achieved with acoustic output levels lower than the US Food and Drug Administration limits in many cases, and an automated tool could be used in real time to find the ALARA MI for specific imaging conditions. Our results support the feasibility of an automated, LOC-based implementation of the ALARA principle for obstetric ultrasound.

6.
Simul Healthc ; 15(2): 69-74, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32044855

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For the past 30 years, there has been a growing emphasis on communication and self-evaluation skills training in graduate medical education. This is reflected in the Next Accreditation System. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is widely used in graduate medical education for assessing dimensions of interpersonal communication and counseling skills. The OSCEs may be developed to target challenging clinical scenarios difficult to capture in clinical practice and can be used as a medium for resident self-evaluation. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to evaluate residents' interpersonal, communication, and counseling skills using Kalamazoo Essential Elements Communication Checklist in 4 clinically challenging scenarios and to compare standardized patient (SP) evaluations to residents' self-evaluation by category of medical school. METHODS: South East Michigan Center for Medical Education is a consortium of teaching hospitals. Member residents participate in 4 OSCEs as part of their postgraduate 1 curriculum. The OSCEs were developed to evaluate clinically relevant but difficult to capture scenarios including: (a) error disclosure/counseling an angry patient; (b) delivering bad news/end of life; (c) domestic violence; and (d) counseling a patient with colon cancer requesting alternative treatments. At the conclusion of each OSCE, SPs evaluated and residents self-evaluated their performance. Once evaluations were completed, SPs provided residents with feedback. RESULTS: Six member institutions and 344 residents participated during the 2014, 2015, and 2016 academic years. There were more international medical graduates (59%) than graduates of Liaison Committee for Medical Education-accredited medical schools. There were more males (62.2%) than females. Standardized patients rated residents higher than residents rated themselves in 2014 (<0.001), but not in 2015 or 2016. When combining all years and all residents, there was no correlation of SP and resident scores. Standardized patients rated female residents higher than female residents rated themselves (P < 0.0001). Male residents scored themselves similarly to the SPs, but male residents rated themselves higher than female residents rated themselves (P < 0.001). Standardized patient scores for male and female residents were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted OSCEs provide an objective format to evaluate residents in challenging clinical scenarios. Resident self-evaluations did not correlate with SPs. In addition, female residents rated themselves lower than male residents and lower than SPs. There is need to develop interventions and curricula to improve resident's self-evaluation skills and in particular address lower self-evaluation by female trainees.


Subject(s)
Educational Measurement/methods , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Patient Simulation , Counseling/standards , Educational Measurement/standards , Female , Grief , Humans , Internship and Residency/standards , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Physician-Patient Relations , Reproducibility of Results , Self-Assessment , Truth Disclosure
7.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 44(4): 794-806, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29336851

ABSTRACT

In this study, we evaluate the clinical utility of fetal short-lag spatial coherence (SLSC) imaging. Previous work has documented significant improvements in image quality with fetal SLSC imaging as quantified by measurements of contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The objective of this study was to examine whether this improved technical efficacy is indicative of the clinical utility of SLSC imaging. Eighteen healthy volunteers in their first and second trimesters of pregnancy were scanned using a modified Siemens SC2000 clinical scanner. Raw channel data were acquired for routinely examined fetal organs and used to generate fully matched raw and post-processed harmonic B-mode and SLSC image sequences, which were subsequently optimized for dynamic range and other imaging parameters by a blinded sonographer. Optimized videos were reviewed in matched B-mode and SLSC pairs by three blinded clinicians who scored each video based on overall quality, target conspicuity and border definition. SLSC imaging was highly favored over conventional imaging with SLSC scoring equal to (28.2 ± 10.5%) or higher than (63.9 ± 12.9%) B-mode for video pairs across all examined structures and processing conditions. Multivariate modeling revealed that SLSC imaging is a significant predictor of improved image quality with p ≤ 0.002. Expert-user scores for image quality support the application of SLSC in fetal ultrasound imaging.


Subject(s)
Fetus/anatomy & histology , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Signal-To-Noise Ratio
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...