Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Matern Child Nutr ; 20(1): e13567, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37789825

ABSTRACT

Formula fed infants experience gastrointestinal infections at higher rates than breastfed infants, due in part to bacteria in powdered infant formula (PIF) and bacterial contamination of infant feeding equipment. The United Kingdom National Health Service (UK NHS) has adopted the World Health Organization recommendation that water used to reconstitute PIF is ≥70°C to eliminate bacteria. We used community science methods to co-design an at home experiment and online questionnaire ('research diary') to explore the safety of PIF preparation compared to UK NHS guidelines. 200 UK-based parents of infants aged ≤12 months were recruited; 151 provided data on PIF preparation, and 143 were included in the analysis of water temperatures used to reconstitute PIF. Only 14.9% (n = 11) of 74 PIF preparation machines produced a water temperature of ≥70°C compared with 78.3% (n = 54) of 69 kettle users (p < 0.001). The mean temperature of water dispensed by PIF preparation machines was 9°C lower than kettles (Machine M = 65.78°C, Kettle M = 75.29°C). Many parents did not always fully follow NHS safer PIF preparation guidance, and parents did not appear to understand the potential risks of PIF bacterial contamination. Parents should be advised that the water dispensed by PIF preparation machines may be below 70°C, and could result in bacteria remaining in infant formula, potentially leading to gastrointestinal infections. PIF labelling should advise that water used to prepare PIF should be ≥70°C and highight the risks of not using sufficiently hot water, per WHO Europe advice. There is an urgent need for stronger consumer protections regarding PIF preparation devices.


Subject(s)
Food Microbiology , Infant Formula , Infant , Humans , Powders , State Medicine , Water
2.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 28(5): 898-9, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11978476

ABSTRACT

We report a case of mixed Aspergillus fumigatus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus stromal keratitis in a 43-year-old man who developed discomfort and swelling in his right eye 20 days after uneventful bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Clinical examination revealed 2 distinct corneal infiltrates beneath the LASIK flap. Corneal scrapings were taken for microscopic examination and culture. Both infiltrates initially improved on topical antibiotic therapy, but over the next 18 days, 1 infiltrate worsened and repeat cultures were performed, which demonstrated A fumigatus. Natamycin 5% and amphotericin 0.1% were started and continued for 8 weeks with resolution of the infiltrate and return of the best corrected visual acuity. Delayed-onset multifocal keratitis is a rare complication of LASIK. Fungal entities should be considered in the differential diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Aspergillosis/etiology , Aspergillus fumigatus/isolation & purification , Eye Infections, Bacterial/etiology , Eye Infections, Fungal/etiology , Keratitis/microbiology , Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ/adverse effects , Staphylococcal Infections/etiology , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Adult , Amphotericin B/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Aspergillosis/drug therapy , Eye Infections, Bacterial/drug therapy , Eye Infections, Fungal/drug therapy , Humans , Keratitis/drug therapy , Male , Natamycin/therapeutic use , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...