Outcomes of Patients with a pH<7.0 Presenting to the Emergency Department (OPpHED Study).

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the mortality and predictive factors in patients presenting with a pH<7.0 to the emergency department (ED). Methods A retrospective study of patients presenting to the ED of University Hospital Galway with a pH<7.0 from January 2014 to December 2017 was performed. A pH<7.0 on arrival to the ED from either an arterial or venous sample as measured by the blood gas analyser machine were assessed for inclusion. Results A total of 130 patients presented to ED over a 4-year period, with a mean age of 58 ±20 years. Eighty-one (63%) patients of the total cohort were male. In terms of aetiology of presentation, 66 (51%) cases were from cardiac arrest (CA), while the remaining 64 (49%) cases were non-cardiac arrest (NCA) related. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 69.5% overall, with significant mortality in the CA group (89%) compared to the NCA group (48%) (p<0.00). A modified early warning score (MEWS) (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% CI: 1.18-1.59) and PCO2 ([OR] 1.35, 95% CI: 1.08-1.68.) were predictive of mortality. Conclusion In patients presenting to the ED with a pH of <7.0 the overall mortality was 69.5%, with survival more likely in NCA aetiologies. Mortality was associated with higher pCO2 and MEWS.

ANCA-associated vasculitis: a comparison of cases presenting to nephrology and rheumatology services.

BACKGROUND: Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) -associated vasculitis (AAV) is a disease characterized by inflammation of small vessels and detectable ANCA in the circulation. Patients may develop a broad spectrum of clinical features ranging from indolent sino-nasal disease and rashes to fulminant renal failure or acute life-threatening pulmonary haemorrhage. Consequently, patients with AAV present to a variety of specialties including nephrology and rheumatology, whose training and approaches to management of such patients may differ. There is little literature comparing patients presenting to different specialties and their outcomes. METHODS: We compared two cohorts of patients with ANCA-positive AAV presenting to either the rheumatology or nephrology department at Galway University Hospitals from June 2002 to July 2011. A standardized data collection form was used to collect information regarding baseline demographics, manifestations of AAV, initial management, relapses and complications. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included in this study (15 rheumatology/30 nephrology). The nephrology cohort was older, had a higher C-reactive protein, Birmingham Vascular Activity Score and ANCA titer at presentation compared to the rheumatology group. Induction treatment varied between the cohorts with rheumatology patients most commonly receiving a combination of oral corticosteroids (73%) and methotrexate (60%) and nephrology patients receiving a combination of intravenous corticosteroids (93%) and cyclophosphamide (90%). Fifty-three percent of the rheumatology patients who completed induction therapy relapsed compared to 30% of the nephrology patients. CONCLUSION: This study presents two different cohorts of patients with the same disease that were managed by two different disciplines. It highlights the heterogeneity of AAV and the importance of interdisciplinary communication and cooperation when managing these patients.