Effect of vancomycin initial dosing on time to systemic inflammatory response syndrome resolution in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Current guidelines suggest using vancomycin-loading doses for complicated infections despite a lack of evidence to support this practice. To address this gap, we performed a single-centre cohort study of 124 patients with sepsis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Patients were allocated into two groups based on initial dose of vancomycin, <20 mg/kg or ≥20 mg/kg, and evaluated for time to resolution of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Among a cohort of 124 patients, 87 received vancomycin initial doses <20 mg/kg and 37 received ≥20 mg/kg. The median time to SIRS resolution was 109 h in the <20 mg/kg group compared to 67 h in the ≥20 mg/kg group. Cox proportional hazard modelling showed a faster resolution of SIRS in the ≥20 mg/kg group (HR = 1.72[1.09-2.73]). Vancomycin initial doses of ≥20 mg/kg led to faster resolution of SIRS although further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Continuation of Statin Therapy and Vasopressor Use in Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Studies have evaluated the use of statins in sepsis; however, no human studies have explored their effect on vasopressor requirements in septic shock. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine the effect of prehospital statin continuation on duration of vasopressor therapy in patients with septic shock. Secondary objectives included maximum and average vasopressor dose and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This was a retrospective, institutional board-approved, observational cohort study in a community teaching hospital; 119 adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with an ICD-9 code for septic shock and prehospital statin therapy were evaluated. Multivariate analyses were performed to address confounders. RESULTS: Of the 1229 patients screened, 119 (10%) met inclusion criteria; 73 patients (61%) had a statin continued within 24 hours of ICU admission. Crude analysis demonstrated no difference in vasopressor duration in the statin versus no statin group (3.3 vs 4.8 days; P = 0.21). There was no difference in either maximum (17.9 ± 16.1 vs 23.8 ± 21.7 µg/min norepinephrine equivalents [NEQs]; P = 0.1) or average vasopressor dose (9.5 ± 8.4 vs 12.1 ± 11.5 µg/min NEQ; P = 0.17). There was a decrease in mortality in the statin patients (43% vs 67 %; P = 0.05). On adjustment for potential confounders, there was no difference in any outcome, with a persistent trend toward lower mortality in the statin group. CONCLUSION: Continuation of prehospital statin therapy decreased neither duration nor dose of vasopressors in patients with septic shock but yielded a trend toward decreased mortality.

The effect of a hypoglycemia treatment protocol on glycemic variability in critically ill patients.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoglycemia and glucose variability are independently associated with increased mortality in septic, surgical, and mixed intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Treatment of hypoglycemia with dextrose 50% can overcorrect blood glucose levels and increase glucose variability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of a hypoglycemia treatment protocol focused on minimizing glucose variability in critically ill patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was conducted at a 772-bed community teaching hospital in Detroit, Michigan. A standardized nursing-driven hypoglycemia treatment protocol specific to critically ill patients was implemented. Glucose variability, amount of dextrose administered, subsequent glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia recurrence, and mortality were compared between pre- and postprotocol groups. RESULTS: The coefficient of variability of blood glucose in the postprotocol group (n = 53) was decreased compared with the preprotocol group (n = 52), 40.9% versus 49.3%, respectively (P = .048). Dextrose usage was significantly reduced between groups (21.2 g preprotocol vs 11.5 g postprotocol; P < .001). The time to first blood glucose check was 36 minutes after protocol implementation compared to 61 minutes before the protocol (P = .003). Finally, the incidence of continued hypoglycemia following dextrose administration and ICU mortality was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the hypoglycemia treatment protocol described led to a reduction in glucose variability, while still providing a safe and effective way to manage hypoglycemia in critically ill patients.

Impact of a phenytoin loading dose program in the emergency department.

PURPOSE: The use of a combined physician-and pharmacist-directed phenytoin loading dose program in an emergency department (ED) was evaluated. METHODS: This single-center, observational, preimplementation-postimplementation study evaluated adult patients who received a phenytoin loading dose in the ED. The primary outcome compared the proportion of optimal phenytoin loading doses in the preimplementation and postimplementation groups. The postimplementation group was further stratified into pharmacist- and prescriber-dosing groups. Other outcomes evaluated included the numbers of appropriate serum phenytoin concentrations measured, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and recurrence of seizures within 24 hours of loading dose administration in the preimplementation and postimplementation groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the proportion of optimal phenytoin loading doses between the preimplementation and postimplementation groups (50% versus 62%, respectively; p=0.19). When stratified by individual groups, the rate of optimal phenytoin loading doses increased by 64% in the postimplementation pharmacist group (50% versus 82%, p=0.007), while the rate in the prescriber-dosing group remained relatively unchanged (50% versus 49%, p=0.91). The number of appropriate serum phenytoin concentrations significantly improved in the postimplementation versus preimplementation group (65% versus 40%, p=0.025). Rates of ADRs and recurrence of seizures did not differ across the study groups. CONCLUSION: No change in the percentage of optimal phenytoin loading doses in the ED was observed after implementation of a combined pharmacist- and physician- dosing program. When stratified into pharmacist or prescriber dosing, the pharmacist-led dosing program significantly improved the proportion of patients who received optimal phenytoin loading doses.

Efficacy and safety of analgosedation with fentanyl compared with traditional sedation with propofol.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of analgosedation with fentanyl versus traditional sedation with propofol in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study evaluating adult critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation at a community teaching hospital who received continuous infusion fentanyl (n=50) or propofol (n=50) from September 2011-March 2013. RESULTS: Median duration of mechanical ventilation was similar between patients receiving propofol and fentanyl infusions (46.7 hr vs 46.0 hr, p=0.19). No difference was noted in median intensive care unit length of stay between groups (p=0.42). A larger percentage of patients receiving propofol required rescue opioids compared with patients receiving fentanyl (56% vs 34%, p=0.04). Furthermore, patients receiving propofol required significantly more rescue opioid therapy during the course of mechanical ventilation as calculated by fentanyl equivalents (150 µg vs 100 µg, p=0.03). No difference in the rate of intensive care unit delirium was noted between groups (fentanyl 23% vs propofol 27%, p=0.80). CONCLUSION: Analgosedation with fentanyl appears to be a safe and effective strategy to facilitate mechanical ventilation. This regimen does not appear to affect duration of mechanical ventilation when compared with propofol, but may allow for more optimal pain management in critically ill patients.

Effects of vitamin D deficiency in critically ill surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of vitamin D deficiency in critically ill patients is reported to be up to 50%, with a 3-fold increase in predicted mortality, but limited data exist concerning vitamin D deficiency in critically ill surgical patients. METHODS: Sixty-six adult surgical intensive care unit patients who had 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum levels evaluated from January 2010 to February 2011 were prospectively identified. Patients were divided into groups according to vitamin D level (<20 vs ≥20 ng/mL). RESULTS: Of the 66 patients evaluated, 49 (74%) had vitamin D levels < 20 ng/mL, and 17 (26%) had vitamin D levels ≥ 20 ng/mL. Patients with vitamin D levels < 20 versus ≥ 20 ng/mL had longer lengths of hospital stay. Lengths of intensive care unit stay were clinically longer, although not significant. Infection rates tended to be higher (P = .09), and a higher incidence of sepsis was seen in the patients with vitamin D levels < 20 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D levels < 20 ng/mL have a significant impact on length of stay, organ dysfunction, and infection rates. More data are needed on the value of supplementation to improve these outcomes.