ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neuropalliative care is a newly-defined subspeciality bringing specific aspects of fields of neurology and palliative care together to better meet the complex care needs of people with progressive neurological diseases. Examining these needs would help provide guidance about developing relevant models of care and identify gaps in research knowledge. AIM: To identify current models and approaches to neuropalliative care for people with progressive neurological diseases and the priorities for future research work. DESIGN: A scoping literature review following the methods described by the Joanna Briggs Institute. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search of the literature was undertaken from six sources including MEDLINE (Ovid), EMCARE, PsycINFO and CINAHL covering the years January 2011 to September 2021. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were found examining neuropalliative care from the perspectives of 4795 PND patients, 774 informal carers and 138 health professionals. All studies held themes of integrative care, with most studies employing outpatient models of multidisciplinary care. Topics discussed included: overcoming local system-issues, providing education for professionals, patients and carers, early referral and capturing outcome measures for quality-assurance and future research work. CONCLUSIONS: Most models of neuropalliative care described in the international literature are predominantly outpatient, multidisciplinary and integrative. Clinicians typically utilise existing neurology and palliative care infrastructure to provide care. More high-quality research and outcome tools are needed to guide the design of evidence-based palliative care for people with progressive neurological diseases.
Subject(s)
Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing , Nervous System Diseases , Humans , Palliative Care/methods , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Health Personnel , Educational StatusABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) cause significant distress to both aged care residents and staff. Despite the high prevalence of BPSD in progressive neurological diseases (PNDs) such as multiple sclerosis, Huntington's disease, and Parkinson's disease, the utility of a structured clinical protocol for reducing BPSD has not been systematically evaluated in PND populations. METHOD: Staff (n = 51) and individuals with a diagnosis of PND (n = 13) were recruited into the study, which aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a PND-specific structured clinical protocol for reducing the impact of BPSD in residential aged care (RAC) and specialist disability accommodation (SDA) facilities. Staff were trained in the clinical protocol through face-to-face workshops, which were followed by 9 weeks of intensive clinical supervision to a subset of staff ("behaviour champions"). Staff and resident outcome measures were administered preintervention and immediately following the intervention. The primary outcome was frequency and severity of BPSD, measured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH). The secondary outcome was staff coping assessed using the Strain in Dementia Care Scale (SDCS). RESULTS: In SDA, significant reductions in staff ratings of job-related stress were observed alongside a statistically significant decrease in BPSD from T1 to T2. In RAC, there was no significant time effect for BPSD or staff coping; however, a medium effect size was observed for staff job stress. CONCLUSIONS: Staff training and clinical support in the use of a structured clinical protocol for managing BPSD were linked to reductions in staff job stress, which may in turn increase staff capacity to identify indicators of resident distress and respond accordingly. Site variation in outcomes may relate to organisational and workforce-level barriers that may be unique to the RAC context and should be systematically addressed in future RCT studies of larger PND samples.
