Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vaccine ; 39(12): 1736-1745, 2021 03 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622590

ABSTRACT

Virulent footrot is a significant economic and animal welfare concern. The disease can be treated, controlled, and eliminated with vaccine, but selecting the appropriate vaccination strategy can be challenging. There are two main strategies: outbreak (serogroup)-specific univalent or bivalent vaccination, or use of a multivalent vaccine containing up to nine of the most common serogroups. The objective of this study was to compare these approaches in sheep flocks infected with multiple Dichelobacter nodosus serogroups. In the first phase, we undertook an immunogenicity trial in which we compared four pre-commercial multivalent recombinant fimbrial vaccines containing six (A, B, C, G, H, I) or nine (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I) serogroups, and compared them to commercial bivalent vaccines. Two multivalent vaccines stimulated significantly higher antibody responses than two other multivalent vaccines but the number of serogroups included in the multivalent vaccine formulations did not have a significant effect. In the first phase, we also compared inter-vaccination intervals of two- and three-months between sequential bivalent vaccines, and found that a two-month interval was sufficient to avoid antigenic competition. In the second phase, the most immunogenic multivalent vaccine (nine serogroups) was compared to sequential bivalent vaccines and monthly foot-bathing in a field trial in four commercial Merino flocks. The duration of protection afforded by the multivalent vaccine was likely to be less than that of the bivalent vaccines, as the antibody titres stimulated were lower and less persistent.


Subject(s)
Dichelobacter nodosus , Foot Rot , Sheep Diseases , Animals , Bacterial Vaccines , Foot Rot/prevention & control , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/prevention & control , Vaccination
2.
Vet Microbiol ; 236: 108378, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31500737

ABSTRACT

Footrot is prevalent in most sheep-producing countries; the disease compromises sheep health and welfare and has a considerable economic impact. The disease is the result of interactions between the essential causative agent, Dichelobacter nodosus, and the bacterial community of the foot, with the pasture environment and host resistance influencing disease expression. The Merino, which is the main wool sheep breed in Australia, is particularly susceptible to footrot. We characterised the bacterial communities on the feet of healthy and footrot-affected Merino sheep across a 10-month period via sequencing and analysis of the V3-V4 regions of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Distinct bacterial communities were associated with the feet of healthy and footrot-affected sheep. Infection with D. nodosus appeared to trigger a shift in the composition of the bacterial community from predominantly Gram-positive, aerobic taxa to predominantly Gram-negative, anaerobic taxa. A total of 15 bacterial genera were preferentially abundant on the feet of footrot-affected sheep, several of which have previously been implicated in footrot and other mixed bacterial diseases of the epidermis of ruminants. Some, including Porphyromonas, can trigger a shift in the composition of bacterial communities and may therefore be of significance to the expression of footrot. A comparison of the communities in footrot lesions of different scores and at different times revealed that this state of dysbiosis is persistent at the active margins of lesions, irrespective of their severity.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Dysbiosis/veterinary , Foot Diseases/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/microbiology , Animals , Bacteria/genetics , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Foot Diseases/microbiology , RNA, Bacterial/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Sheep
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 56(4)2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29436426

ABSTRACT

Virulent footrot is an economically significant disease in most sheep-rearing countries. The disease can be controlled with vaccine targeting the fimbriae of virulent strains of the essential causative agent, Dichelobacter nodosus However, the bacterium is immunologically heterogeneous, and 10 distinct fimbrial serogroups have been identified. Ideally, in each outbreak the infecting strains would be cultured and serogrouped so that the appropriate serogroup-specific mono- or bivalent vaccine could be administered, because multivalent vaccines lack efficacy due to antigenic competition. If clinical disease expression is suspected to be incomplete, culture-based virulence tests are required to confirm the diagnosis, because control of benign footrot is economically unjustifiable. Both diagnosis and vaccination are conducted at the flock level. The aims of this study were to develop a PCR-based procedure for detecting and serogrouping D. nodosus directly from foot swabs and to determine whether this could be done accurately from the same cultured swab. A total of 269 swabs from the active margins of foot lesions of 261 sheep in 12 Merino sheep flocks in southeastern Australia were evaluated. DNA extracts taken from putative pure cultures of D. nodosus and directly from the swabs were evaluated in PCR assays for the 16S rRNA and fimA genes of D. nodosus Pure cultures were tested also by the slide agglutination test. Direct PCR using extracts from swabs was more sensitive than culture for detecting and serogrouping D. nodosus strains. Using the most sensitive sample collection method of the use of swabs in lysis buffer, D. nodosus was more likely to be detected by PCR in active than in inactive lesions, and in lesions with low levels of fecal contamination, but lesion score was not a significant factor. PCR conducted on extracts from swabs in modified Stuart's transport medium that had already been used to inoculate culture plates had lower sensitivity. Therefore, if culture is required to enable virulence tests to be conducted, it is recommended that duplicate swabs be collected from each foot lesion, one in transport medium for culture and the other in lysis buffer for PCR.


Subject(s)
Dichelobacter nodosus/classification , Foot Rot/diagnosis , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Dichelobacter nodosus/isolation & purification , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Foot Rot/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Hoof and Claw/microbiology , Hoof and Claw/pathology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/isolation & purification , Serotyping , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/microbiology , Sheep, Domestic , Vaccination
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 55(5): 1313-1326, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28202796

ABSTRACT

Dichelobacter nodosus is a fastidious, strictly anaerobic bacterium, an obligate parasite of the ruminant hoof, and the essential causative agent of virulent ovine footrot. The clinical disease results from a complex interplay between the pathogen, the environment, and the host. Sheep flocks diagnosed with virulent but not benign footrot in Australia may be quarantined and required to undergo a compulsory eradication program, with costs met by the farmer. Virulence of D. nodosus at least partially depends on the elaboration of a protease encoded by aprV2 and manifests as elastase activity. Laboratory virulence tests are used to assist diagnosis because clinical differentiation of virulent and benign footrot can be challenging during the early stages of disease or when the disease is not fully expressed due to unfavorable pasture conditions. Using samples collected from foot lesions from 960 sheep from 40 flocks in four different geographic regions, we evaluated the analytical characteristics of qPCR tests for the protease gene alleles aprV2 and aprB2, and compared these with results from phenotypic protease (elastase and gelatin gel) tests. There was a low level of agreement between clinical diagnosis and quantitative PCR (qPCR) test outcomes at both the flock and sample levels and poor agreement between qPCR test outcomes and the results of phenotypic virulence tests. The diagnostic specificity of the qPCR test was low at both the flock and individual swab levels (31.3% and 18.8%, respectively). By contrast, agreement between the elastase test and clinical diagnosis was high at both the flock level (diagnostic sensitivity [DSe], 100%; diagnostic specificity [DSp], 78.6%) and the isolate level (DSe, 69.5%; DSp, 80.5%).


Subject(s)
Dichelobacter nodosus/genetics , Dichelobacter nodosus/pathogenicity , Foot Rot/diagnosis , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Australia , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Dichelobacter nodosus/isolation & purification , Foot Rot/microbiology , Pancreatic Elastase/analysis , Serine Endopeptidases/genetics , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...