Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Med Care ; 58(12): 1069-1074, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925461

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding differences between patients referred to hospice from different care locations. OBJECTIVE: The objective this study was to describe the associations between hospice referral locations and hospice patient and admission characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of hospice administrative data. SUBJECTS: Adult (age older than 18 y) decedents of a national, for-profit, hospice chain across 19 US states who died between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. MEASURES: Patients' primary hospice diagnosis, hospice length stay, and hospice care site. We also determined the frequency of opioid prescriptions with and without a bowel regimen on hospice admission. RESULTS: Among 78,647 adult decedents, the mean age was 79.2 (SD=13.5) years, 56.4% were female, and 69.9% were a non-Hispanic White race. Most hospice referrals were from the hospital (51.9%), followed by the community (21.9%), nursing homes (17.4%), and assisted living (8.8%). Cancer (33.6%) was the most prevalent primary hospice diagnosis; however, this varied significantly between referral locations (P<0.001). Similarly, home hospice (32.8%) was the most prevalent site; however, this also varied significantly between referral locations (P<0.001). More hospital-referred patients (55.6%) had a hospice length of stay <7 days compared with patients referred from nursing homes (30.3%), the community (28.9%), or assisted living (18.7%), P<0.001. Hospital-referred patients also had the lowest frequency (58.4%) of coprescribed opioids and bowel regimen on hospice admission compared with other referral locations. CONCLUSION: We observed significant differences in hospice patient and admission characteristics by referral location.


Subject(s)
Hospices/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospice Care/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Opioid-Induced Constipation/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
2.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 33(7): 638-43, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26261375

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: End-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presents health care providers with challenges of providing optimal palliative care for patients who follow a less predictable trajectory. The objectives of this study were to evaluate medications being prescribed to patients with end-stage COPD, compared to recommendations made by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, and to determine which medications were provided by the hospice organization. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our database for medications pertaining to COPD management as stated in the GOLD criteria or those used for symptoms associated with end of life. RESULTS: A total of 745 patients met inclusion criteria, and approximately 63% were prescribed opioids. Prescribing rates for oxygen, short-acting ß2-agonists, and short-acting anticholinergics were 37%, 33%, and 31%, respectively. Systemic and inhaled corticosteroids were prescribed at higher rates of 20% and 18% compared to long-acting bronchodilators. DISCUSSION: Medications used for COPD exacerbation management were prescribed at higher rate than those used for maintenance treatment.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Hospice Care/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Retrospective Studies
4.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 7(2): 203-9, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24524594

ABSTRACT

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy is difficult to treat, partially because the underlying mechanism of pain is not fully understood. Various treatment guidelines recommend first-line agents, such as α2-δ ligands, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants but combination therapy of alternative agents including opiates is often warranted. Tapentadol extended-release has a novel dual mechanism of action; it is both a mu-opioid receptor agonist and a norephinephrine reuptake inhibitor. It has been in the spotlight since it was FDA-approved specifically for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in 2012. Previous reviews of tapentadol have focused on chronic pain. The purpose of this review article is to assess the efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended-release in adult populations with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy and provide guidance for formulary decisions.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Neuropathies/drug therapy , Phenols/therapeutic use , Receptors, Opioid, mu/agonists , Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Decision Making , Delayed-Action Preparations , Diabetic Neuropathies/physiopathology , Formularies as Topic , Humans , Phenols/administration & dosage , Phenols/pharmacology , Tapentadol
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...