Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
1.
Ann Surg Open ; 5(1): e384, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38883944

ABSTRACT

Background: Perioperative data are essential to improve the safety of surgical care. However, surgical outcome research (SOR) from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is disproportionately sparse. We aimed to assess practices, barriers, facilitators, and perceptions influencing the collection and use of surgical outcome data (SOD) in LMICs. Methods: An internet-based survey was developed and disseminated to stakeholders involved in the care of surgical patients in LMICs. The Performance of Routine Information Systems Management framework was used to explore the frequency and relative importance of organizational, technical, and behavioral barriers. Associations were determined using χ 2 and ANOVA analyses. Results: Final analysis included 229 surgeons, anesthesia providers, nurses, and administrators from 36 separate LMICs. A total of 58.1% of individuals reported that their institution had experience with collection of SOD and 73% of these reported a positive impact on patient care. Mentorship and research training was available in <50% of respondent's institutions; however, those who had these were more likely to publish SOD (P = 0.02). Sixteen barriers met the threshold for significance of which the top 3 were the burden of clinical responsibility, research costs, and accuracy of medical documentation. The most frequently proposed solutions were the availability of an electronic data collection platform (95.3%), dedicated research personnel (93.2%), and access to research training (93.2%). Conclusions: There are several barriers and facilitators to collection of SOD that are common across LMICs. Most of these can be addressed through targeted interventions and are highlighted in this study. We provide a path towards advancing SOR in LMICs.

2.
Children (Basel) ; 5(9)2018 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30150600

ABSTRACT

Chronic pain is a serious health concern and potentially debilitating condition, leading to anxiety, depression, reduced productivity and functionality, and poor quality of life. This condition can be even more detrimental and incapacitating in the pediatric patient population. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), pain services are often inadequate or unavailable, leaving most of the world's pediatric population with chronic pain untreated. Many of these children in LMICs are suffering without treatment, and often die in pain. Awareness and advocacy for this population must be prioritized. We reviewed the available literature on the chronic pediatric pain burden in LMICs, barriers to treatments, and current efforts to treat these patients.

3.
Int Anesthesiol Clin ; 56(3): 1-4, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29889121
4.
Int J Surg ; 54(Pt A): 285-289, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29730073

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical and anaesthesia data, including outcomes, remain limited in low-income countries (LIC). This study reviews the surgical burden and anaesthesia services at a tertiary care hospital in Mozambique. METHODS: Information on activities within the department of anaesthesia at Maputo Central Hospital for 2014-15 was collected from its annual report and verified by the Chairman of Anaesthesia. Personnel information and health care metrics for the hospital in 2015 were collected and verified by hospital leadership. RESULTS: Maputo Central Hospital has 1423 beds with 50.1% allocated to primary surgical services. 39.7% of total admissions were to surgical services, and in 2015 the hospital performed 10,049 major operations requiring anaesthesia. The OB/GYN service had the most operations with 2894 (28.8%), followed by general surgery (1665, 16.6%). Inpatient surgical mortality was 4.1% and surgical-related diagnoses comprised two of the top 9 causes of death, with malignant neoplasms and hemorrhage from trauma causing the highest mortality. In 2014-15, Maputo Central Hospital employed 15 anesthesiologists, with 4 advanced and 23 basic mid-level anaesthesia providers. Of 10,897 total anaesthesia cases in 2014, 6954 were general anaesthesia and 3925 were neuraxial anaesthesia. Other anaesthesia services included chronic pain and intensive care consultation. Anaesthesia department leadership noted a strong desire to improve data collection and analysis for anaesthesia outcomes and complications, requested an additional administrator for statistical analysis. DISCUSSION: This profile of anaesthesia services at a large tertiary hospital in Mozambique highlights several features of anaesthesia care and surgical burden in LICs, including challenges of resource limitations, patient comorbidity, and social dynamics present in Mozambique that contribute to prolonged hospital stays. As noted, enhanced data collection and analysis within the department and the hospital may be useful in identifying strategies to improve outcomes and patient safety.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/statistics & numerical data , Anesthesiologists/statistics & numerical data , Anesthesiology/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mozambique
7.
Anesth Analg ; 125(5): 1616-1626, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28806206

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evaluation and treatment of chronic pain worldwide are limited by the lack of standardized assessment tools incorporating consistent definitions of pain chronicity and specific queries of known social and psychological risk factors for chronic pain. The Vanderbilt Global Pain Survey (VGPS) was developed as a tool to address these concerns, specifically in the low- and middle-income countries where global burden is highest. METHODS: The VGPS was developed using standardized and cross-culturally validated metrics, including the Brief Pain Inventory and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale, as well as the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire along with queries about pain attitudes to assess the prevalence of chronic pain and disability along with its psychosocial and emotional associations. The VGPS was piloted in both Nepal and India over a 1-month period in 2014, allowing for evaluation of this tool in 2 distinctly diverse cultures. RESULTS: Prevalence of chronic pain in Nepal and India was consistent with published data. The Nepali cohort displayed a pain point prevalence of 48%-50% along with some form of disability present in approximately one third of the past 30 days. Additionally, 11% of Nepalis recorded pain in 2 somatic sites and 39% of those surveyed documented a history of a traumatic event. In the Indian cohort, pain point prevalence was approximately 24% to 41% based on the question phrasing, and any form of disability was present in 6 of the last 30 days. Of the Indians surveyed, 11% reported pain in 2 somatic sites, with only 4% reporting a previous traumatic event. Overall, Nepal had significantly higher chronic pain prevalence, symptom severity, widespread pain, and self-reported previous traumatic events, yet lower reported pain severity. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm prevalent chronic pain, while revealing pertinent cultural differences and survey limitations that will inform future assessment strategies. Specific areas for improvement identified in this VGPS pilot study included survey translation methodology, redundancy of embedded metrics and cultural limitations in representative sampling and in detecting the prevalence of mental health illness, catastrophizing behavior, and previous traumatic events. International expert consensus is needed.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Central Nervous System Sensitization , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Chronic Pain/psychology , Cost of Illness , Cultural Characteristics , Disability Evaluation , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Status , Health Surveys , Humans , Illness Behavior , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Nepal/epidemiology , Pain Measurement , Pain Perception , Pilot Projects , Prevalence , Young Adult
8.
Hand Clin ; 33(2): 399-407, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28363304

ABSTRACT

Measuring the extent and impact of a health problem is key to being able to address it appropriately. This review uses available information within the framework of the Global Burden of Disease studies to estimate the disease burden due to burn injuries of the hands. The GBD indicates that since 1990 there has been an approximately 30% decrease in the disease burden related to burn injuries. The GBD methods have not been applied specifically to hand burns, but from available data, it is estimated that about 18 million people in the world suffer from sequelae of burns to the hands.


Subject(s)
Burns/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Hand Injuries/epidemiology , Humans
10.
Anesth Analg ; 122(6): 2028-39, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27195643

ABSTRACT

Globally, 8 of the top 12 disabling conditions are related either to chronic pain or to the psychological conditions strongly associated with persistent pain. In this narrative review, we explore the demographic and psychosocial associations with chronic pain exclusively from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and compare them with current global data. One hundred nineteen publications in 28 LMICs were identified for review; associations with depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress, insomnia, disability, gender, age, rural/urban location, education level, income, and additional sites of pain were analyzed for each type of chronic pain without clear etiology. Of the 119 publications reviewed, pain was described in association with disability in 50 publications, female gender in 40 publications, older age in 34 publications, depression in 36 publications, anxiety in 19 publications, and multiple somatic complaints in 13 publications. Women, elderly patients, and workers, especially in low-income and low-education subgroups, were more likely to have pain in multiple sites, mood disorders, and disabilities. In high-income countries, multisite pain without etiology, female gender, and association with mood disturbance and disability may be suggestive of a central sensitization syndrome (CSS). Because each type of prevalent chronic pain without known etiology reviewed had similar associations in LMICs, strategies for assessment and treatment of chronic pain worldwide should consider the possibility of prevalent CSS. Recognition is especially critical in resource-poor areas, because treatment of CSS is vastly different than localized chronic pain.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/economics , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Developing Countries/economics , Income , Poverty/economics , Affect , Age Distribution , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/psychology , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Disability Evaluation , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution
11.
World J Surg ; 40(7): 1786, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27098540
12.
World J Surg ; 40(7): 1537-41, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26932877

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite global efforts to reduce the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) through the World Health Organization's (WHO) Millennium Development Goal 5 (MDG5), MMR remains unacceptably high in low-income countries (LICs). Maternal death and disability from hemorrhage, infection, and obstructed labor may be averted by timely cesarean section (CS). Most LICs have CS rates less than that recommended by the WHO. Without access to timely CS, it is unlikely that MMR in LICs will be further reduced. Our purpose was to measure the MMR gap between the current MMR in LICs and the MMR if LICs were to raise their CS rates to the WHO recommended levels (10-15 %). METHODS: This model makes the assumption that increasing the CS rates to the recommended rates of 10-15 % will similarly decrease the MMR in these LICs. WHO health statistics were used to generate estimated MMRs for countries with CS rates between 10 and 15 % (N = 14). A weighted MMR average was determined for these countries. This MMR was subtracted from the MMR of each LIC to determine the MMR gap. The percent decrease in MMR due to increasing CS rate was calculated and averaged across the LICs. RESULTS: We found an average 62.75 %, 95 %CI [56.38, 69.11 %] reduction in MMR when LICs increase their CS rates to WHO recommended levels (10-15 %). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal mortality is unacceptably high in LICs. Increasing CS rates to WHO recommended rates will decrease the maternal mortality in these countries, significantly decreasing the mortality ratio toward the projected MDG5.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Mortality , Models, Theoretical , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
13.
Anesth Analg ; 122(5): 1634-9, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26983052

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The World Bank and Lancet Commission in 2015 have prioritized surgery in Low-Income Countries (LIC) and Lower-Middle Income Countries (LMICs). This is consistent with the shift in the global burden of disease from communicable to noncommunicable diseases over the past 20 years. Essential surgery must be performed safely, with adequate anesthesia monitoring and intervention. Unfortunately, a huge barrier to providing safe surgery includes the paucity of an anesthesia workforce. In this study, we qualitatively evaluated the anesthesia capacity of Mozambique, a LIC in Africa with limited access to anesthesia and safe surgical care. Country-based solutions are suggested that can expand to other LIC and LMICs. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the Mozambique anesthesia system was conducted through interviews with personnel in the Ministry of Health (MOH), a school of medicine, a public central referral hospital, a general first referral hospital, a private care hospital, and leaders in the physician anesthesia community. Personnel databases were acquired from the MOH and Maputo Central Hospital. RESULTS: Quantitative results reveal minimal anesthesia capacity (290 anesthesia providers for a population of >25 million or 0.01:10,000). The majority of physician anesthesiologists practice in urban settings, and many work in the private sector. There is minimal capacity for growth given only 1 Mozambique anesthesia residency with inadequate resources. The most commonly perceived barriers to safe anesthesia in this critical shortage are lack of teachers, lack of medical student interest in and exposure to anesthesia, need for more schools, low allocation to anesthesia from the list of available specialist prospects by MOH, and low public payments to anesthesiologists. Qualitative results show assets of a good health system design, a supportive environment for learning in the residency, improvement in anesthetic care in past decades, and a desire for more educational opportunities and teachers. CONCLUSIONS: Mozambique has a strong health system design but few resources for surgery and safe anesthesia. At present, similar to other LICs, human resources, access to essential medicines, and safety monitoring limit safe anesthesia in Mozambique.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Anesthesiology , Delivery of Health Care , Health Workforce , Process Assessment, Health Care , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Anesthesia/standards , Anesthesia Department, Hospital , Anesthesiology/education , Anesthesiology/organization & administration , Anesthesiology/standards , Databases, Factual , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Developing Countries , Education, Medical , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Needs and Demand , Health Services Research , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Health Workforce/standards , Hospitals, Private , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Models, Organizational , Mozambique , Needs Assessment , Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards
14.
J Epidemiol Glob Health ; 5(1): 75-83, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25700926

ABSTRACT

The surgical and anaesthesia needs of low-income countries are mostly unknown due to the lack of data on surgical infrastructure and human resources. The goal of this study is to assess the surgical and anaesthesia capacity in Guyana. A survey tool adapted from the WHO Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care was used to survey nine regional and district hospitals within the Ministry of Health system in Guyana. In nine hospitals across Guyana, there were an average of 0.7 obstetricians/gynaecologists, 3.5 non-OB surgeons, and 1 anaesthesiologist per hospital. District and regional hospitals performed an annual total of 1520 and 10,340 surgical cases, respectively. All but 2 district hospitals reported the ability to perform surgery. An average hospital has two operating rooms; 6 out of 9 hospitals reported routine medication shortages, and 4 out of 9 hospitals reported routine water or electricity shortages. Amongst the three regional hospitals, 16.1% of pregnancies resulted in Caesarean section. Surgical capacity varies by hospital type, with district hospitals having the least surgical capacity and surgical volume. District level hospitals routinely do not perform surgery due to lack of basic infrastructure and human resources.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Obstetrical/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Obstetric Surgical Procedures/methods , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/statistics & numerical data , Developing Countries , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Guyana , Humans , Obstetric Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy
17.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 27(6): 623-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25225826

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The global burden of surgical disease is significant and growing. As a result, the vital role of essential surgical care and safe anesthesia in low-income and middle-income countries is gaining increasing attention. Importantly, vast disparities in access to essential surgery and safe anesthesia exist. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge surrounding the global crisis of inadequate anesthesia capacity and barriers to patient safety in low-income and middle-income countries. RECENT FINDINGS: The major patient safety challenges in low-income and middle-income countries include a lack of well trained anesthesia providers, inadequate infrastructure, equipment, monitors, medicines, oxygen, and blood products, and an absence of meaningful data to guide policies and programs. SUMMARY: Explicit mention of essential surgery and safe anesthesia in the Post-2015 Development Agenda is a critical step forward in advancing the cause of global perioperative care. Tracking surgical and anesthesia outcomes with a metric, such as the perioperative mortality rate, must be required at the hospital, country, and global level to guide improvement of surgical and anesthetic interventions aimed at the burden of surgical disease.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Anesthesiology/methods , Developing Countries , Health Services Accessibility , Patient Safety , Humans
18.
Surgery ; 155(3): 365-73, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24439745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgery has been neglected in low- and middle-income countries for decades. It is vital that the Post-2015 Development Agenda reflect that surgery is an important part of a comprehensive global health care delivery model. We compare the operative capacities of multiple low- and middle-income countries and identify critical gaps in surgical infrastructure. METHODS: The Harvard Humanitarian Initiative survey tool was used to assess the operative capacities of 78 government district hospitals in Bangladesh (n = 7), Bolivia (n = 11), Ethiopia (n = 6), Liberia (n = 11), Nicaragua (n = 10), Rwanda (n = 21), and Uganda (n = 12) from 2011 to 2012. Key outcome measures included infrastructure, equipment availability, physician and nonphysician surgical providers, operative volume, and pharmaceutical capacity. RESULTS: Seventy of 78 district hospitals performed operations. There was fewer than one surgeon or anesthesiologist per 100,000 catchment population in all countries except Bolivia. There were no physician anesthesiologists in any surveyed hospitals in Rwanda, Liberia, Uganda, or in the majority of hospitals in Ethiopia. Mean annual operations per hospital ranged from 374 in Nicaragua to 3,215 in Bangladesh. Emergency operations and obstetric operations constituted 57.5% and 40% of all operations performed, respectively. Availability of pulse oximetry, essential medicines, and key infrastructure (water, electricity, oxygen) varied widely between and within countries. CONCLUSION: The need for operative procedures is not being met by the limited operative capacity in numerous low- and middle-income countries. It is of paramount importance that this gap be addressed by prioritizing essential surgery and safe anesthesia in the Post-2015 Development Agenda.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/statistics & numerical data , Developing Countries , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, District/organization & administration , Medically Underserved Area , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Anesthesiology , Bangladesh , Bolivia , Emergencies , Ethiopia , General Surgery , Health Care Surveys , Health Resources/organization & administration , Hospitals, District/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Liberia , Nicaragua , Patient Safety , Physicians/supply & distribution , Rwanda , Uganda , Workforce
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...