Cumulative volumetric analysis as a key criterion for the treatment of brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated diminished cognitive function, worse quality of life, and no overall survival benefit from the addition of adjuvant whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of brain metastases. This study analyzes the treatment outcome of SRS, specifically CyberKnife Radiosurgery, based on the total tumor volume compared to the absolute number of lesions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of hospital records at Virginia Hospital Center for patients with brain metastases who underwent CyberKnife Radiosurgery between June 2008 and June 2014 was performed. Previous treatment history, metastatic tumor dimensions, and outcomes were recorded. Predictors of neurological defects, local tumor progression, and overall survival were assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We identified 130 adult patients with a median age of 61.5years and a median follow-up of 7.1months. Unfavorable outcomes such as death, tumor progression, or neurological defect showed correlation with cumulative tumor volume greater than the median volume of 7cc (p<0.05). Worsening neurological defects showed an association with an increased number of lesions (p<0.02) and age (p<0.05). For local tumor progression, patients who have received WBRT were less likely to progress (.74, 95% CI, .48, 1.10), while those who received chemotherapy (1.48 95% CI, .98, 2.26), or surgery (1.56 95%, CI .98, 2.47) without WBRT were more likely to progress. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a cumulative tumor volume greater than 7cc correlates with worse outcomes following CyberKnife Radiosurgery. In addition, WBRT appears to have a role in improved survival for patients with increased tumor burden. A prospective study is warranted to validate these findings.

CyberKnife radiosurgery in the treatment of complex skull base tumors: analysis of treatment planning parameters.

BACKGROUND: Tumors of the skull base pose unique challenges to radiosurgical treatment because of their irregular shapes, proximity to critical structures and variable tumor volumes. In this study, we investigate whether acceptable treatment plans with excellent conformity and homogeneity can be generated for complex skull base tumors using the Cyberknife radiosurgical system. METHODS: At Georgetown University Hospital from March 2002 through May 2005, the CyberKnife was used to treat 80 patients with 82 base of skull lesions. Tumors were classified as simple or complex based on their proximity to adjacent critical structures. All planning and treatments were performed by the same radiosurgery team with the goal of minimizing dosage to adjacent critical structures and maximizing target coverage. Treatments were fractionated to allow for safer delivery of radiation to both large tumors and tumors in close proximity to critical structures. RESULTS: The CyberKnife treatment planning system was capable of generating highly conformal and homogeneous plans for complex skull base tumors. The treatment planning parameters did not significantly vary between spherical and non-spherical target volumes. The treatment parameters obtained from the plans of the complex base of skull group, including new conformity index, homogeneity index and percentage tumor coverage, were not significantly different from those of the simple group. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that CyberKnife treatment plans with excellent homogeneity, conformity and percent target coverage can be obtained for complex skull base tumors. Longer follow-up will be required to determine the safety and efficacy of fractionated treatment of these lesions with this radiosurgical system.

CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of spinal tumors for pain control and quality of life.

OBJECT: The authors conducted a study to assess safety, pain, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes following CyberKnife radiosurgical treatment of spinal tumors. METHODS: Data obtained in all patients with spinal tumors who underwent CyberKnife radiosurgery at Georgetown University Hospital between March 2002 and March 2003 were analyzed. Patients underwent examination, visual analog scale (VAS) pain assessment, and completed the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) before treatment and at 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months following treatment. Fifty-one patients with 72 lesions (58 metastatic and 14 primary) were treated. The mean follow-up period was 1 year. Pain was improved, with the mean VAS score decreasing significantly from 51.5 to 21.3 at 4 weeks (p < 0.001). This effect on pain was durable, with a mean score of 17.5 at 1 year, which was still significantly decreased (p = 0.002). Quality of life was maintained throughout the study period. After 18 months, physical well-being was 33 (initial score 32; p = 0.96) and mental well-being was 43.8 (initial score 44.2; p = 0.97). (The mean SF-12 score is 50 +/- 10 [standard deviation].) Adverse effects included self-limited dysphagia (three cases), diarrhea (two cases), lethargy (three cases), paresthesias (one case), and wound dehiscence (one case). CONCLUSIONS: CyberKnife radiosurgery improves pain control and maintains QOL in patients treated for spinal tumors. Early adverse events are infrequent and minor. The authors await long-term follow-up data to determine late complications and tumor control rates.