Long-term cancer surveillance: results from the Forteo Patient Registry Surveillance Study.

The Forteo Patient Registry estimated the incidence of osteosarcoma in US patients treated with teriparatide and enrolled in the study between 2009 and 2019. No incident cases of osteosarcoma were identified among patients registered, and the crude incidence rate was 0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-10.2) cases per million person-years. PURPOSE: The prospective, voluntary Forteo Patient Registry was established to estimate the incidence of osteosarcoma in patients who have received treatment with teriparatide (Forteo). METHODS: Information on US adults prescribed teriparatide and enrolled in the Forteo Patient Registry 2009-2019 was linked with data from participating state cancer registries annually (2010-2019) to identify incident osteosarcoma cases using a standardized linkage algorithm. Teriparatide exposure was ascertained from self-reported data that included teriparatide initiation and demographics necessary to complete linkage. Osteosarcoma cases diagnosed on or after January 1, 2009, were identified by participating state cancer registries. The crude incidence rate (IR) and standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of observed cases to the expected number of cases adjusted to the background rate (3 per million person-years) and corresponding 95% CIs for the occurrence of osteosarcoma were calculated whereby the cumulative amount of person-time observed was adjusted for mortality. RESULTS: Data for 75,247 enrolled patients (representing 361,763 cumulative person-years) were linked to each of 42 participating state cancer registries (covering 93% of the US population), which included information on 6180 cases of osteosarcoma. No matches with incident cases of osteosarcoma following registry enrollment were found. The crude IR was 0 (95% CI, 0-10.2) cases per million person-years and the SIR was 0 (95% CI, 0-3.0). CONCLUSIONS: The ability to draw conclusions about the incidence of osteosarcoma among patients participating in the registry was limited due to the smaller than expected amount of patient follow-up time and the fact that no cases were identified.

A randomized controlled clinical trial of the serotonin type 3 receptor antagonist alosetron in women with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder seen in primary care practice. The symptoms of IBS, including abdominal pain, discomfort, and abnormal bowel function, may be modulated by activity of the serotonin type 3 receptor (5-HT(3)). The efficacy and tolerability of the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist alosetron hydrochloride in nonconstipated female patients with IBS were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Patients received either 1 mg of alosetron hydrochloride (n = 309) or placebo (n = 317) twice daily for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week posttreatment period. Adequate relief of IBS pain and discomfort was the primary end point. Secondary end points included improvements in urgency, stool frequency, stool consistency, incomplete evacuation, and bloating. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of patients were classified as having diarrhea-predominant IBS. Forty-three percent of alosetron-treated patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS reported adequate relief for all 3 months compared with 26% of placebo-treated patients (P<.001; percentage point difference = 17; 95% confidence interval, 8.0-25.4). Improvement with alosetron compared with placebo was observed by the end of the fourth week of treatment and persisted throughout the remainder of treatment. Alosetron significantly decreased urgency and stool frequency and caused firmer stools within 1 week of starting treatment. Effects were sustained throughout treatment and symptoms returned following treatment cessation. No significant improvement in the percentage of days with sense of incomplete evacuation or bloating was observed compared with placebo during the first month of treatment. Constipation was the most commonly reported adverse event. CONCLUSION: Alosetron hydrochloride, 1 mg twice daily for 12 weeks, is effective in relieving pain and some bowel-related symptoms in diarrhea-predominant female patients with IBS.

Tolerability and safety of alosetron during long-term administration in female and male irritable bowel syndrome patients.

OBJECTIVES: Alosetron (Lotronex) is a new therapeutic agent for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in women with diarrhea-predominant IBS. This multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the safety and tolerability of alosetron during long-term (< or = 12 months) treatment. METHODS: A total of 859 subjects (637 female and 222 male) with IBS were enrolled from 130 sites in the United States and were randomized 3:1 to receive 1 mg alosetron or placebo b.i.d. for 48 wk; of the subjects, 649 (76%) were randomized to the alosetron group and 212 (24%) to the placebo group. Of the original group, 850 subjects received at least one dose of alosetron (n = 640) or placebo (n = 210). RESULTS: In all, 59% of the subjects completed the study. Safety data were similar in treatment groups and within age, sex, racial origin, and hormone use. Adverse events were reported by 83% (530/640) and 76% (159/210) of subjects in the alosetron and placebo groups, respectively, (p < 0.05) and were similar with the exception of constipation; 32% of subjects receiving alosetron reported constipation, compared to 5% in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Most reports (72%) of constipation were of mild or moderate severity, and 66% of subjects with constipation had single episode of 8 days median duration. Constipation occurred a median of 13 days after initiating treatment and resolved spontaneously, with laxative, or after a brief interruption of therapy. Of the subjects, 4% (11/210) in the alosetron and 5% (28/ 640) in the placebo group experienced serious adverse events. Two deaths occurred in subjects with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors; neither death was attributed to the study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Alosetron 1 mg b.i.d. for 12 months was well tolerated. Constipation is the most frequent adverse event, with a higher incidence of transient constipation in alosetron-treated patients, typically occurring in the first month of treatment.

Alosetron improves quality of life in women with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of alosetron, a treatment recently approved in the United States for irritable bowel syndrome in diarrhea-predominant female patients, on health-related quality of life. METHODS: Quality of life was assessed as part of two 12-wk randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled irritable bowel syndrome studies comparing alosetron 1 mg b.i.d. with placebo (S3BA3001 and S3BA3002). Patients completed a validated disease-specific quality of life questionnaire, the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life Questionnaire (IBSQOL), at baseline and at the 12-wk or final visit. The clinical relevance of data were also evaluated by a minimal meaningful difference instrument. RESULTS: A total of 626 and 647 patients were enrolled in studies S3BA3001 and S3BA3002, respectively. Approximately 70% of patients in each study had diarrhea-predominant IBS. In diarrhea-predominant patients enrolled in S3BA3001, statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvements with alosetron versus placebo were observed on all nine IBSQOL scales (emotional health, mental health, sleep, energy, physical functioning, food/diet, social functioning, role-physical, and sexual relations) and for all but one scale (mental health) in S3BA3002. In both studies, a significantly greater percentage of patients treated with alosetron (p < 0.05) experienced clinically meaningful improvement on three of the nine IBSQOL scales (food/diet, social functioning, and role-physical) compared with patients treated with placebo. Patients treated with alosetron did not show worsening in any quality of life domain compared with patients treated with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These results in women with diarrhea-predominant IBS demonstrate that alosetron significantly improves health-related quality of life.

Efficacy and safety of alosetron in women with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder with symptoms of abdominal pain, discomfort, and altered bowel function. Antagonists of the type 3 serotonin receptor (5-HT3) have shown promising results in the relief of IBS-associated symptoms. We aimed to confirm these findings by doing a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: We studied 647 female IBS patients with diarrhoea-predominant or alternating bowel patterns (diarrhoea and constipation). 324 patients were assigned 1 mg alosetron and 323 placebo orally twice daily for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week post-treatment period. Adequate relief of abdominal pain and discomfort was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included improvements in urgency, stool frequency, and stool consistency. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 79 (24%) of patients in the alosetron group and 53 (16%) in the placebo group dropped out. The difference in the drop-out rate between groups was mainly due to a greater occurrence of constipation in the alosetron group. A greater proportion of alosetron-treated patients than placebo-treated patients (133 [41%] vs 94 [29%], respectively) reported adequate relief for all 3 months of treatment (difference 12% [4.7-19.2]). Alosetron also significantly decreased urgency and stool frequency, and increased stool firmness. Constipation occurred in 30% and 3% of patients in the alosetron and placebo groups, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Alosetron was well tolerated and clinically effective in alleviating pain and bowel-related symptoms in this population of women with IBS.

Recurrent symptoms and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with duodenal ulcer treated for Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori has been shown to prevent relapse of endoscopically detected duodenal ulcers. There is controversy regarding symptom improvement after therapy. Some studies have suggested that a substantial number of patients remain symptomatic after eradication therapy. Other studies suggest that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may develop as a result of H. pylori eradication. AIM: To determine the relationship between symptoms and H. pylori eradication and to determine whether H. pylori eradication results in symptoms or endoscopic findings of GERD. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-two patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer disease and evidence of H. pylori infection by rapid urease testing and histology were studied in four randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of H. pylori eradication therapy. All patients underwent symptom assessment and endoscopy with biopsy before therapy and 1 and 6 months after completing therapy. The rapid urease test and histology were used to determine H. pylori status. Interviewers were blinded to H. pylori status after eradication and were unaware of the endoscopic findings (interviews were performed prior to repeat endoscopy). RESULTS: The presence of epigastric pain was significantly associated with persistent H. pylori infection 1 month after therapy (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI: 1.02-5.2; P=0.041), as was nausea (OR 7.1, 95% CI: 0.93-55.6; P=0.029). The presence of epigastric pain was significantly associated with ulcer relapse at 6 months (OR 7.5, 95% CI: 3.6-15.7; P < 0.001) as was nausea (OR 5.1, 95% CI: 1.7-16.0; P=0.002). Heartburn was not associated with eradication of H. pylori or ulcer relapse. New onset reflux symptoms were reported by 17% (17 of 101 patients) at 6 months and were not significantly different in patients with (15%) and without (22%) persistent H. pylori infection (P=0.47). Erosive oesophagitis was present at endoscopy in one of the 17 cases that developed new heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: One month after completion of therapy, the presence of epigastric pain or nausea is associated with persistent infection and these symptoms at 6 months are suggestive of duodenal ulcer relapse. The incidence of GERD is not increased in patients who have eradication of H. pylori.

Improvement in pain and bowel function in female irritable bowel patients with alosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist.

BACKGROUND: No currently available treatment provides consistent relief of irritable bowel syndrome. Colonic sensory and motor function are modulated partly through 5HT3-receptors. AIM: To evaluate effects of the 5HT3-receptor antagonist, alosetron, in irritable bowel syndrome. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging (1, 2, 4, 8 mg b.d. alosetron), 12-week trial in 370 patients with diarrhoea-predominant or alternating constipation and diarrhoea irritable bowel syndrome. Weekly measurement of adequate relief was the key end-point; other irritable bowel syndrome symptoms were collected daily using an electronic phone system. RESULTS: Alosetron (1 mg or 2 mg b.d.) significantly (P < 0.05 vs. placebo) increased the proportion of females, but not males, reporting adequate relief. Stool consistency, frequency and percentage days with urgency improved over placebo (P < 0.05) within the first month with all doses of alosetron, and persisted throughout the trial with all doses in female patients. With 1 mg b.d. alosetron, females had improved stool consistency and urgency within the first week, and adequate relief and improved stool frequency within the first 2 weeks. There was no consistent improvement in bowel function among male patients. CONCLUSION: In female irritable bowel syndrome patients with predominant diarrhoea or alternating constipation and diarrhoea, alosetron is effective in treatment of abdominal pain and discomfort and bowel-related symptoms.

Helicobacter pylori infection rates in duodenal ulcer patients in the United States may be lower than previously estimated.

OBJECTIVE: Published studies have estimated the rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in patients with duodenal ulcer disease to be as high as 95%; the majority of remaining duodenal ulcers have been attributed to the use of ulcerogenic drugs such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). We aimed to assess the H. pylori prevalence rates of U.S. duodenal ulcer patients in large, well-controlled studies. METHODS: More than 2900 patients with endoscopically diagnosed non-NSAID duodenal ulcers were enrolled in a series of six placebo-controlled, double-blind studies conducted in the United States that assessed H. pylori using a combination of tests. Patients were considered infected with H. pylori only if culture growth was observed, or both histological and CLOtest results were positive. Patients were considered uninfected if the results of at least two tests were negative. Patients with missing test results, results of only a single test, or conflicting test results were not evaluable for H. pylori assessment. RESULTS: Of the 2394 endoscopically diagnosed evaluable duodenal ulcer patients, 73% (1737) were confirmed infected with H. pylori at study entry. CONCLUSIONS: The results of six carefully designed and controlled studies suggest that an assumed H. pylori infection rate of approximately 95% may overestimate the actual rate of H. pylori infection in duodenal ulcer patients in the United States. Although H. pylori infection is an important factor in the etiology of noniatrogenic duodenal ulcer disease, other factors may predominate in some patients and should not be overlooked in determining an appropriate course of treatment. The empiric use of antibiotic therapy for ulcer patients without confirmation of the presence of H. pylori cannot be recommended.

Twice-daily versus thrice-daily clarithromycin in combination with ranitidine bismuth citrate in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC), 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, plus clarithromycin, 500 mg tid, is a regimen approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcers. Proof that the clarithromycin portion of the regimen could be given twice daily without loss of efficacy would reduce cost and improve patient compliance. The objective of this study was to compare the H. pylori eradication rates in patients who had duodenal ulcer and were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with RBC, 400 mg bid, in conjunction with 2 weeks of therapy with either clarithromycin, 500 mg tid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg bid. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had a duodenal ulcer and were H. pylori-positive by at least two tests were randomly assigned to (1) RBC, 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, plus clarithromycin, 500 mg tid for 2 weeks, or (2) RBC, 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, plus clarithromycin, 500 mg bid for 2 weeks. H. pylori eradication was assessed 4 weeks after completion of RBC plus clarithromycin. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-three patients from 78 centers had a duodenal ulcer and were H. pylori-positive. The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) and the per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were statistically equivalent between the twice-daily (65% MITT, 74% PP) and thrice-daily (63% MITT, 73% PP) clarithromycin treatment regimens. Incidence and types of adverse events did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For eradicating H. pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer, clarithromycin, 500 mg bid for 2 weeks, with RBC, 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, is equivalent to clarithromycin, 500 mg tid with RBC. The potential enhancement of patient compliance, reduced cost of clarithromycin, and equivalent efficacy would support the use of twice-daily clarithromycin in triple-therapy regimens with RBC.

Ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin: a dual therapy regimen for patients with duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: The combination of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) and clarithromycin (CLR) was compared with each treatment alone for the eradication of H. pylori and healing of duodenal ulcers in patients infected with H. pylori. METHODS: This two-phase, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluated 203 patients with an active duodenal ulcer treated with either (1) RBC 400 mg BID for 4 weeks plus CLR 500 mg TID for the first 2 weeks; (2) RBC 400 mg BID for 4 weeks plus placebo TID for the first 2 weeks; (3) placebo BID for 4 weeks plus CLR 500 mg TID for the first 2 weeks; or (4) placebo BID for 4 weeks plus placebo TID for the first 2 weeks. Patients with healed ulcers after treatment entered a 24-week observation phase for the assessment of H. pylori and ulcer relapse. RESULTS: Four-week ulcer healing rates were higher with RBC + CLR (71%) and RBC alone (66%) compared with placebo (15%; p < 0.05) and CLR alone (49%). H. pylori eradication rates were significantly higher with RBC + CLR (86%) compared with RBC alone (0%, p < .001) or CLR alone (24%, p < .001). Ulcer recurrence rates after 6 months were lower in patients eradicated of H. pylori infection (17%) compared with patients who remained infected (43%). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin is a simple, convenient, and well-tolerated dual therapy regimen that is effective in eradicating H. pylori and healing duodenal ulcers in patients infected with H. pylori. The eradication of H. pylori in patients with healed ulcers significantly reduces the rate of ulcer relapse.

Clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin is a key component of several antimicrobial treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori. Cure rates with clarithromycin-containing regimens are significantly decreased when resistance is present. Resistance develops by a point mutation in the ribosomal RNA of some organisms exposed to clarithromycin. We studied the prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant organisms in patients with duodenal ulcer in the United States from 1993-96. METHODS: Patients with endoscopic evidence of a duodenal ulcer were studied. Gastric biopsies were cultured for H. pylori and antimicrobial sensitivity was determined by the E-test (epsilometer agar diffusion gradient). RESULTS: In 1993-94, three of 78 patients (4%) had clarithromycin-resistant strains of H. pylori. In 1995-96, 44 of 348 patients (12.6%; p = 0.025) had resistant strains of H. pylori. Patients who had previously failed antimicrobial treatment for H. pylori accounted for much of the increase in resistant strains (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Failed therapy with clarithromycin-based regimens is a growing cause of antimicrobial resistance in H. pylori in the United States. Whereas the overall rates of primary resistance are low, the increase in secondary resistance over a short period of time is worrisome. New treatments that prevent the emergence of resistance may be important in the future.

An alternative non-macrolide, non-imidazole treatment regimen for curing Helicobacter pylori and duodenal ulcers: ranitidine bismuth citrate plus amoxicillin. The RBC H. pylori Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Because patients who fail to be cured of H. pylori infection following macrolide or imidazole therapy are difficult to treat, there is a clear need for a reasonably effective and simple second-line treatment regimen. The purpose of these two studies was to evaluate the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus amoxicillin for the cure of H. pylori infection and for healing duodenal ulcers and preventing ulcer relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two identically designed randomized, double-blind, double-dummy studies were conducted in patients with an H. pylori-associated duodenal ulcer. Patients were treated with either RBC 400 mg bid for 4 weeks plus amoxicillin 500 mg qid for 2 weeks, RBC 400 mg bid for 4 weeks and placebo qid for 2 weeks, placebo bid for 4 weeks and amoxicillin 500 mg qid for 2 weeks, or placebo bid for 4 weeks and placebo qid for 2 weeks. Patients with healed ulcers after 4 weeks of treatment were eligible for entry into a 24-week observation phase for the assessment of H. pylori status (culture, histology, and CLOtest) and ulcer relapse. RESULTS: A total of 229 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection at baseline were evaluated. Of these, 132 whose ulcers had healed entered the 24-week posttreatment observation phase. The combination of RBC plus amoxicillin resulted in higher H. pylori cure rates (55%) and higher duodenal ulcer healing (74%) than did either treatment alone. All treatment were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus amoxicillin cures H. pylori infection in more than half of the patients treated. This treatment regimen shows promise as the basis for future non-macrolide, non-imidazole triple therapy regimens for curing H. pylori infection. Such regimens may be appropriate second-line treatment for patients who are resistant to or who are unable to tolerate macrolide- or imidazole-containing therapies.

Adequate relief as an endpoint in clinical trials in irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is characterized by recurrent abdominal pain and altered bowel function. In designing studies to evaluate new treatments for this disease, however, it is difficult to select appropriate endpoints to reflect improvement in the range of symptoms of the syndrome. In the present study we evaluated the parameter of adequate relief of abdominal pain and discomfort, as perceived by the patients, as a key endpoint for efficacy in the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Abdominal pain and bowel function data were collected daily from 370 patients with the disease during treatment with placebo or a novel potent 5HT3 receptor antagonist. Once every 7 days adequate relief of pain and discomfort was assessed. Quality-of-life data were collected using self-administered questionnaires. The endpoint of adequate relief was significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with improvement in pain severity scores, percentage of pain-free days, percentage of days with urgency, improvement in stool frequency and consistency, and quality-of-life parameters. Adequate relief of pain and discomfort is significantly correlated with changes in multiple parameters associated with irritable bowel syndrome and can be used as an endpoint for assessing response to therapy in these patients.

Ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin is effective for healing duodenal ulcers, eradicating H. pylori and reducing ulcer recurrence. RBC H. pylori Study Group.

AIM: To compare the efficacy of the coadministration of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus the antibiotic clarithromycin, with ranitidine bismuth citrate alone or clarithromycin alone for the healing of duodenal ulcers, eradication of H. pylori and the reduction of ulcer recurrence. METHODS: This two-phase, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study consisted of a 4-week treatment phase followed by a 24-week post-treatment observation phase. Patients with an active duodenal ulcer were treated with either ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. for 4 weeks plus clarithromycin 500 mg t.d.s. for the first 2 weeks; ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. for 4 weeks plus placebo t.d.s. for first 2 weeks; placebo b.d. for 4 weeks plus clarithromycin 500 mg t.d.s. for the first 2 weeks; or placebo b.d. for 4 weeks plus placebo t.d.s. for the first 2 weeks. RESULTS: Ulcer healing rates after 4 weeks of treatment were highest with ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin (82%) followed by ranitidine bismuth citrate alone (74%; P = 0.373), clarithromycin alone (73%; P = 0.33) and placebo (52%; P = 0.007). Ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin provided significantly better ulcer symptom relief compared with clarithromycin alone or placebo (P < 0.05). The coadministration of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin resulted in significantly higher H. pylori eradication rates 4 weeks post-treatment (82%) than did treatment with either ranitidine bismuth citrate alone (0%; P < 0.001), clarithromycin alone (36%; P = 0.008) or placebo (0%; P < 0.001). Ulcer recurrence rates 24 weeks post-treatment were lower following treatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin (21%) compared with ranitidine bismuth citrate alone (86%; P < 0.001), clarithromycin alone (40%; P = 0.062) or placebo (88%; P = 0.006). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin is a simple, well-tolerated and effective treatment for active H. pylori-associated duodenal ulcer disease. This treatment regimen effectively heals duodenal ulcers, provides effective symptom relief, eradicates H. pylori infection and reduces the rate of ulcer recurrence. The eradication of H. pylori infection in patients with recently healed duodenal ulcers is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of ulcer recurrence.

Effects of sucralfate and ranitidine on aluminum concentrations in elderly volunteers.

Elevated aluminum concentrations have been implicated in several disease states in the elderly. We examined the effects of sucralfate, a basic aluminum salt of sucrose sulfate, and ranitidine, administered individually and in combination, on plasma and urine aluminum concentrations in the elderly in a prospective, randomized, three-arm crossover study. Subjects were 20 healthy volunteers over age 65 years, with no clinically significant comorbidities or recent use of aluminum-containing drugs or histamine (H)2-antagonists. The three regimens were ranitidine 300 mg at bedtime, sucralfate 1 g 4 times/day, and ranitidine 300 mg at bedtime plus sucralfate 1 g 4 times/day, administered for 4 weeks, with a washout period of at least 1 week between regimens. Plasma and urine aluminum concentrations were measured on days 0, 1, 7, 14, and 28 of each regimen. After 28 days, mean plasma aluminum concentrations were significantly higher in subjects receiving sucralfate alone (8.5 +/- 1.8 micrograms/L) and sucralfate plus ranitidine (5.1 +/- 1.3 micrograms/L) compared with those receiving ranitidine alone (2.4 +/- 0.7 micrograms/L). Urine aluminum concentrations were significantly higher in subjects receiving sucralfate alone (133.2 +/- 32.8 micrograms/g creatinine) and sucralfate plus ranitidine (148.1 +/- 51.9 micrograms/g creatinine) compared with those receiving ranitidine alone (11.0 +/- 3.7 micrograms/g creatinine). There was no significant difference in plasma or urine aluminum concentrations between subjects who received sucralfate alone versus those who received sucralfate plus ranitidine. Sucralfate 4 g/day in elderly subjects produces a significant increase in both plasma and urine aluminum concentrations, compared with ranitidine 300 mg/day. This increase most likely is secondary to gastrointestinal absorption of aluminum in the sucralfate formulation. The clinical relevance of this increase requires further evaluation.

Ranitidine 300 mg at bedtime is effective for gastric ulcers: a 12-wk, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison. The Ranitidine 300 mg HS Gastric Ulcer Study Group.

Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily is effective for the treatment of gastric ulcers. We proposed that ranitidine 300 mg once daily would also be effective. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study, adults with an endoscopically verified acute gastric ulcer > or = 5 mm were treated with either ranitidine 300 mg (n = 183) or placebo (n = 178) at bedtime for up to 12 wk. Gastric ulcer healing, determined by endoscopy, was achieved in 65% and 89% of ranitidine-treated patients by 6 and 12 wk, compared with 45% and 72% of placebo-treated patients by 6 wk and 12 wk (p < 0.001). Throughout the 12-wk study, ranitidine 300 mg was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving pain (p < 0.05), with ranitidine-treated patients also using fewer antacid tablets. Ranitidine 300 mg had a safety profile similar to that of placebo. We conclude that ranitidine 300 mg at bedtime is safe and effective for healing acute gastric ulcers.