Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Curr Oncol ; 31(3): 1302-1310, 2024 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534931

ABSTRACT

Background: This study, using real-world data, assesses the impact of RS testing on treatment pathways and the associated economic consequences of such testing. This paper pertains to lobular breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was undertaken between 2011 and 2019 on a cross-section of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative, lymph node-negative, early-stage breast cancer patients. All patients had ILC and had RS testing in Ireland. The patient population is representative of the national population. Patients were classified as low (RS ≤ 25) or high (RS > 25) risk. Patients aged ≤50 were stratified as low (RS 0-15), intermediate (RS 16-25), or high risk (RS > 25). Results: A total of 168 patients were included, most of whom had grade 2 (G2) tumors (n = 154, 92%). Overall, 155 patients (92.3%) had low RS (≤25), 12 (7.1%) had high RS (>25), and 1 (0.6%) had unknown RS status. In 29 (17.5%) patients aged ≤50 at diagnosis, RS was ≤15 in 16 (55%), 16-20 in 6 (21%), 21-25 in 5 (17%), >25 in 1 (3.5%), and unknown in 1 (3.5%). Post RS testing, 126 patients (78%) had a change in chemotherapy recommendation; all to hormone therapy. In total, only 35 patients (22%) received chemotherapy. RS testing achieved a 75% reduction in chemotherapy use, resulting in savings of €921,543.84 in treatment costs, and net savings of €387,283.84. Conclusions: The use of this test resulted in a 75% reduction in chemotherapy and a significant cost savings in our publicly funded health system.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Lobular , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Ireland , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(12)2022 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36560412

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is an unprecedented global health emergency. It has been highly disruptive for patients with cancer, both due to an increased burden of severe illness and due to pressure on healthcare systems. COVID-19 vaccination has been an important public health measure for this patient group. AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the rapid design and startup of a multicentre study of COVID-19 vaccine response for vulnerable patients with cancer. Study startup: We set up a multicentre prospective observational study of COVID-19 vaccination response for Australian patients with cancer. Due to intensive collaboration between health services, the funding body and laboratories, we were able to develop a protocol and enrol the first patient within 52 days of the initial study proposal. Rapid startup was further enabled by prompt availability of funding and by high-level engagement of institutional review boards, allowing expedited review. Study enrolment: We rapidly enroled more than 500 patients, 80% within 4 months of study opening. Engagement and follow-up were maintained throughout the course of up to five serial vaccination doses. CONCLUSION: Our study is an example of intensive collaboration inspired by the COVID-19 pandemic and may serve as an example of an agile research response to real-time public health challenges.

3.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 21(17): 2185-2194, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866411

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed worldwide. Data from several studies fall short to make appropriate conclusions on the management for elderly patients. The discovery of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has allowed these patients access to a wider array of options. AREAS COVERED: The authors review research for treating older patients with lung cancer focusing on research performed in this patient population. Data are presented relating to chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy in the advanced setting. EXPERT OPINION: Elderly patients particularly benefit from advances in systemic therapy. Based on the tumor profile, treatment with targeted therapy or immunotherapy should be favored over chemotherapy where possible in the elderly population. Elderly patients benefit from EGFR, ALK, and ROS-1 inhibition in the setting of these tumor alterations. These agents should be utilized early in the treatment course. Across many studies, the benefit from immunotherapy is seen irrespective of age. Favorable outcomes and toxicity profiles from immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy are well described. Chemotherapy should be offered with caution after a detailed assessment. Options include combination or single-agent chemotherapy regimens. Best supportive care alone is a reasonable option in the frailer, highly co-morbid patient.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Immunotherapy/methods , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Vinorelbine/therapeutic use , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Survival Analysis
4.
Ir J Med Sci ; 188(1): 59-67, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29766409

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Young women with breast cancer (YWBC) represent 7-12% of breast cancer diagnoses and ostensibly have more biologically aggressive subtypes with higher relapse and mortality rates. We studied the clinical and pathological characteristics in YWBC and examined how outcomes and treatment have evolved. METHODS: YWBC were identified from pathology databases at two tertiary centers. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those diagnosed from 2000 to 2005 (C1) and from 2006 to 2015 (C2). Data were retrieved from clinical, radiology, and histology databases. Statistical analysis was performed using R® (V3.2.0). RESULTS: We identified 345 patients. Median age was 36 years (23-39 years). Mastectomy was performed in 232 patients (67.2%) and axillary lymph node clearance (ALNC) in 207 patients (60% [C1 82.7 vs. C2: 49.4%, p < 0.001]). One hundred-seventy patients (49%) were ER + HER2-, 88 (25.5%) were HER2+, and 58 (16.8%) were triple negative. Eighty patients (23.2%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Pathological complete response rates were statistically similar between C1 and C2 [C1 1 (0.9%) vs C2 16 (6.8%) p = 0.1]. Distant relapse occurred in 59 (19%) patients. There was a higher relapse rate (RR) in C1 [27 (32.1%) vs. 32 (15.7%), p < 0.002). HER2+ and ER+ HER2- patients in C1 had higher RRs than C2. Median overall survival in patients with metastatic disease was 29 months (range 2-119 months). CONCLUSION: Locally advanced disease was more prevalent in YWBC. Mastectomy and ALNC rates were high and most received multimodal treatment. The extent of axillary surgery declined over time. Outcomes were unchanged in triple negative patients. These remain a priority for research.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Lymph Node Excision/trends , Mastectomy/trends , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Axilla , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm Staging , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Women's Health , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...