Extent of investigation and management of cases of 'unexplained' mismatch repair deficiency (u-dMMR): a UK Cancer Genetics Group consensus.

BACKGROUND: Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a characteristic feature of cancers linked to Lynch syndrome. However, in most cases, it results from sporadic somatic events rather than hereditary factors. The term 'Lynch-like syndrome' (LLS) has been used to guide colorectal cancer surveillance for relatives of individuals with a dMMR tumour when somatic and germline genomic testing is uninformative. As the assessment of mismatch repair through immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability is increasingly applied across various tumour types for treatment planning, dMMR is increasingly detected in tumours where suspicion of hereditary aetiology is low. Our objective was to establish current practices and develop national guidance for investigating, and managing relatives of, patients with cancers demonstrating unexplained dMMR. METHODS: This was achieved through a virtual consensus meeting involving key stakeholders from the UK, through premeeting surveys, structured discussions and in-meeting polling to formulate best practice guidance. RESULTS: We identified variability in the availability of diagnostic technologies across specialist centres. It was agreed that equitable access to baseline testing is required, acknowledging the need for a pragmatic approach to investigating dMMR cancers not traditionally associated with Lynch syndrome. Factors such as family history, age, tumour type, protein loss pattern and extent of the investigation were deemed crucial in guiding family management. The term 'unexplained dMMR' was recommended over LLS. CONCLUSION: Decisions regarding investigations and future cancer risk management in patients and relatives should be nuanced, considering factors like clinical suspicion of hereditary predisposition to allocate limited resources efficiently and avoid unnecessary investigations in low-suspicion families.

A pilot study investigating feasibility of mainstreaming germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in high-risk patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer in three tertiary Cancer Centres in Ireland.

In the Republic of Ireland (ROI), BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing has been traditionally undertaken in eligible individuals, after pre-test counselling by a Clinical Geneticist/Genetic Counsellor. Clinical Genetics services in ROI are poorly resourced, with routine waiting times for appointments at the time of this pilot often extending beyond a year. The consequent prolonged waiting times are unacceptable where therapeutic decision-making depends on the patient's BRCA status. "Mainstreaming" BRCA1/BRCA2 testing through routine oncology/surgical clinics has been implemented successfully in other centres in the UK and internationally. We aimed to pilot this pathway in three Irish tertiary centres. A service evaluation project was undertaken over a 6-month period between January and July 2017. Eligible patients, fulfilling pathology and age-based inclusion criteria defined by TGL clinical, were identified, and offered constitutional BRCA1/BRCA2 testing after pre-test counselling by treating clinicians. Tests were undertaken by TGL Clinical. Results were returned to clinicians by secure email. Onward referrals of patients with uncertain/pathogenic results, or suspicious family histories, to Clinical Genetics were made by the treating team. Surveys assessing patient and clinician satisfaction were sent to participating clinicians and a sample of participating patients. Data was collected with respect to diagnostic yield, turnaround time, onward referral rates, and patient and clinician feedback. A total of 101  patients underwent diagnostic germline BRCA1/BRCA2 tests through this pathway. Pathogenic variants were identified in 12 patients (12%). All patients in whom variants were identified were appropriately referred to Clinical Genetics. At least 12 additional patients with uninformative BRCA1/BRCA2 tests were also referred for formal assessment by Clinical Geneticist or Genetic Counsellor. Issues were noted in terms of time pressures and communication of results to patients. Results from a representative sample of participants completing the satisfaction survey indicated that the pathway was acceptable to patients and clinicians. Mainstreaming of constitutional BRCA1/BRCA2 testing guided by age- and pathology-based criteria is potentially feasible for patients with breast cancer as well as patients with ovarian cancer in Ireland.

A Review of Breast Cancer Risk Factors in Adolescents and Young Adults.

Cancer in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) deserves special consideration for several reasons. AYA cancers encompass paediatric malignancies that present at an older age than expected, or early-onset of cancers that are typically observed in adults. However, disease diagnosed in the AYA population is distinct to those same cancers which are diagnosed in a paediatric or older adult setting. Worse disease-free and overall survival outcomes are observed in the AYA setting, and the incidence of AYA cancers is increasing. Knowledge of an individual's underlying cancer predisposition can influence their clinical care and may facilitate early tumour surveillance strategies and cascade testing of at-risk relatives. This information can further influence reproductive decision making. In this review we discuss the risk factors contributing to AYA breast cancer, such as heritable predisposition, environmental, and lifestyle factors. We also describe a number of risk models which incorporate genetic factors that aid clinicians in quantifying an individual's lifetime risk of disease.

FOXE1 polymorphism rs965513 predisposes to thyroid cancer in a European cohort.

Objective: FOXE1 is an intronless gene on chromosome 9 which plays a significant role in thyroid morphogenesis. Mutations in FOXE1 are associated with thyroid phenotypes including congenital hypothyroidism, thyroid dysgenesis and thyroid cancer. This study aims to investigate the frequency and impact of a SNP (rs965513, G>A) at 9q22.23 in a Western European cohort of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer(DTC), compared to controls. Design: This is a candidate gene case control study. Methods: 277 patients with histologically confirmed DTC were recruited from tertiary referral centres in Ireland and France. 309 cancer-free controls were recruited from the community. DNA was extracted from buccal swabs or whole blood of control subjects and patients with DTC. Allelic and genotypic frequencies among patients were compared with controls, to assess the risk for disease conferred by homozygous and heterozygous carriers compared to WT genotypes. Genotyping was performed using Taqman-based PCR. Results: 277 patients with confirmed DTC and 309 non-cancer controls were genotyped for the variant (rs965513). The frequency of the minor allele among cases was 0.45 compared to 0.34 among controls. The genotypic odds ratio for heterozygotes was 1.66 (CI 1.16-2.39, P =0.00555), increasing to 2.93 (CI 1.70-5.05, P =0.00007) for rare homozygotes. All subjects were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (±χ2, P =0.09, P =0.07 respectively). Conclusions: This FOXE1 polymorphism is a low penetrance variant associated with DTC susceptibility in this cohort. The minor allele was identified among patients with thyroid cancer significantly more frequently than controls. An allele dosage effect was observed, with rare homozygous genotypes conferring greater risk than heterozygotes.

Managing uncertainty in inherited cardiac pathologies-an international multidisciplinary survey.

Multi-gene testing is useful in genetically heterogeneous conditions, including inherited cardiac pathologies. Increasing the number of genes analysed increases diagnostic yield of variants of certain, likely, or uncertain pathogenicity. Concerns exist regarding management of variants of uncertain/likely pathogenicity in conditions of oligogenic inheritance or variable expressivity. We surveyed a sample of colleagues across different specialties and departments internationally to compare management of patients with class 3 or class 4 variants in genes associated with non-syndromic cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia. An electronic survey regarding clinical management of variants ( www.surveymonkey.com/r/cardiacvariants ) was designed and distributed to colleagues internationally via professional bodies and direct email. 150 respondents (88 centres, 27 countries) completed the survey, most of whom were Clinical Geneticists or Genetic Counsellors. Most respondents offer pre-symptomatic testing to asymptomatic relatives of an individual with class 4 or class 5 variants. A minority of respondents offer pre-symptomatic testing for class 3 variants. Considering class 4 variants, 22 (15%) are fully reassuring that the patient with a negative predictive test would not develop the familial phenotype, while 123 (82%) counselled patients about the possibility of variant reclassification. Variability existed between and within centres and specialties. Multiple "free text" comments were provided. Recurring themes including need for multidisciplinary input, technical concerns, and concern regarding duty to review variants of uncertain significance. This study demonstrates that variability in management of likely pathogenic/uncertain variants exists. Close multi-disciplinary input is essential. The development of disorder or gene-specific evidence-based guidelines might ameliorate uncertainty in management.

Towards establishing consistency in triage in a tertiary specialty.

Clinical Genetics services provide a diagnostic, counselling and genetic testing service for children and adults affected by, or at risk of, a genetic condition, most of which are rare, and/or genetically heterogeneous. Appropriate triage of referrals is crucial to ensure that the most urgent referrals are seen as quickly as possible, without negatively impacting the waiting times of less urgent cases. We aimed to examine triage practice in six Clinical Genetic centres across the United Kingdom and Ireland. Thirteen simulated referrals were drafted based on common referrals to Clinical Genetics. Copies of each referral were forwarded to each centre, where 10 nominated clinicians were asked to triage each referral. Triaged referrals were returned to the coordinating author for analysis. An electronic questionnaire was contemporaneously completed by clinical leads in each unit to gather local demographic details and local operating procedures relevant to triage. Widespread inconsistencies were noted both within and between units, with respect to the acceptance of referrals to the services, prioritisation and designated clinic type. Referral rates, staffing levels and waiting lists varied widely between units. Inconsistencies observed between units are likely influenced by a number of factors, including staffing levels, referral rates and average family size. Inconsistency within units likely reflects the complex nature of many Clinical Genetic referrals, and triage guidelines should help improve decision-making in this setting.

The role of genomic profiling in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer participating in phase I clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with cancer between ages 15-39 years may harbour germline variants associated with cancer predisposition. Such variants represent putative therapeutic targets, as may somatic variants in the tumour. Germline and tumour molecular profiling is increasingly utilised to facilitate personalisation of cancer treatment in such individuals. AIM: Considering AYAs with advanced solid tumours managed in a specialist drug development unit (DDU), the aims of this study were to investigate the use and impact of: 1. Germline genetic assessment. 2. Tumour molecular profiling. METHODS: AYAs treated in the DDU at the Royal Marsden Hospital between 2002 and 2016 were identified from departmental databases. Data regarding clinicopathological features, clinical assessments and germline and tumour genetic testing were retrieved by chart review. RESULTS: The study cohort included 219 AYAs. Common cancer types included sarcoma (41, 19%); cervical (27, 12%); breast (25, 11%); ovarian (23, 11%) and colorectal (21, 10%) cancers. Germline testing was undertaken in 34 (16%) patients, 22 of whom carried a pathogenic variant. Using current testing criteria, an additional 32 (15%) would be eligible for germline testing based on their personal history of cancer alone. Tumour testing was undertaken in 46 (21%) individuals. Somatic mutations were commonly identified in TP53 13 (28%); PIK3CA (8, 18%); KRAS (4, 9%) and MET 5 (11%). DISCUSSION: A significant proportion of AYAs with advanced cancer have targetable somatic or germline mutations. Consideration of familial risk factors and inclusion of germline testing wherever appropriate can complement tumour testing to optimise patient management and inform management of at-risk relatives.

A genetic variant at 12p11 significantly modifies breast cancer risk in a genetically homogenous island population.

Genome-wide association studies have identified novel breast cancer susceptibility loci at 12q24 (rs1292011), 12p11 (rs10771399) and 21q21 (rs2823093). The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of variants at these three loci in an Irish sample, and to examine the association between these variants and breast cancer in this cohort. DNA was extracted from the blood or buccal swabs of Irish patients with breast cancer (cases), as well as from healthy Irish female controls. Genotyping was performed for each target using a Taqman-based platform. Data were analysed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 22. Genotyping was performed on samples from 1,267 patients with breast cancer and 841 cancer-free controls. The per-allele odds ratio associated with the minor allele at 12p11 was found to be 0.67 (0.54-0.81, p < 0.001). Genotype-specific odds ratios showed an allele dosage effect with odds ratio of 0.76 (0.6-0.95) for heterozygotes, and 0.23 (0.1-0.51) for rare homozygotes. Minor allele frequencies of the variants at 12q24 and 21q21 did not differ significantly between cases or controls. All three investigated variants were identified in the Irish population. The polymorphism rs10771399 was strongly associated with breast cancer risk in this cohort, and was shown to be associated with reduced odds ratio for all molecular subtypes.

The impact of Oncotype DX testing on breast cancer management and chemotherapy prescribing patterns in a tertiary referral centre.

INTRODUCTION: The use of chemotherapy in node-negative, (O)Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer has changed significantly since the introduction of Oncotype DX to determine systemic recurrence risk based on tumour genomic signature. AIMS: This study aims to METHODS: A cohort study was undertaken, including consecutive patients with early node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer diagnosed between 2006 and May 2013, including a period of prospective clinical trial (Trial Assigning Individualised Options for Treatment (TAILORx)) recruitment. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, tumour clinico-pathological features, Oncotype DX use and recurrence score and chemotherapy use. All therapeutic decisions were made following multidisciplinary discussion, with adherence to guidelines and consideration of trial protocol and Oncotype DX recurrence scores. RESULTS: 479 consecutive patients were included in the study, of whom 241 (50%) underwent Oncotype DX testing, 97 as part of the TAILORx clinical trial. Oncotype DX testing began on a trial basis in 2007 and until October 2011, only patients enrolled on TAILORx availed of genomic profiling. From October 2011, Oncotype DX was used in all eligible patients as per National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP) guidelines. A total of 216 (45%) patients received chemotherapy. The use of chemotherapy changed in inverse proportion to the availability of the genomic assay. Of those patients in whom Oncotype DX was utilised, 138 (57%) were spared chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This study validates the use of molecular testing in the rationalisation of systemic therapy.

Assessing the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the management of the breast and axilla in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nodal status is a sensitive prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Axillary metastases may be an indication for neoadjuvant systemic therapy. The aims of this study were to compare pathologic response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the breast and axilla across different molecular subtypes of breast cancer and to compare the predictive value of axillary assessment before and after chemotherapy in determining final nodal status in this cohort of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The cohort comprised patients undergoing NAC from 2003 to November 2012. Data regarding patient and tumor characteristics, management, and outcomes were obtained from a prospectively maintained database and analyzed using PASW Statistics, version 18 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Two hundred two cancers were identified in 196 patients. One hundred thirty-one (65%) diagnostic axillary procedures were performed, 105 (80%) before NAC, of which 93 (89%) were positive. In 28 (30%), downstaging was noted before NAC. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) subtypes had the highest rate of complete pathologic response (n = 11 [61%]) and negative axillary clearance (AXCn) (n = 11 [69%]). Of 177 AXCns, 68 (38%) were negative before NAC. CONCLUSION: AXCn in patients undergoing NAC remains controversial. HER2 subtypes are less likely to have axillary involvement after NAC and may demand different management.