Cross-Cutting mHealth Behavior Change Techniques to Support Treatment Adherence and Self-Management of Complex Medical Conditions: Systematic Review.

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have immense potential to support disease self-management for people with complex medical conditions following treatment regimens that involve taking medicine and other self-management activities. However, there is no consensus on what discrete behavior change techniques (BCTs) should be used in an effective adherence and self-management-promoting mHealth solution for any chronic illness. Reviewing the extant literature to identify effective, cross-cutting BCTs in mHealth interventions for adherence and self-management promotion could help accelerate the development, evaluation, and dissemination of behavior change interventions with potential generalizability across complex medical conditions. Objective: This study aimed to identify cross-cutting, mHealth-based BCTs to incorporate into effective mHealth adherence and self-management interventions for people with complex medical conditions, by systematically reviewing the literature across chronic medical conditions with similar adherence and self-management demands. Methods: A registered systematic review was conducted to identify published evaluations of mHealth adherence and self-management interventions for chronic medical conditions with complex adherence and self-management demands. The methodological characteristics and BCTs in each study were extracted using a standard data collection form. Results: A total of 122 studies were reviewed; the majority involved people with type 2 diabetes (28/122, 23%), asthma (27/122, 22%), and type 1 diabetes (19/122, 16%). mHealth interventions rated as having a positive outcome on adherence and self-management used more BCTs (mean 4.95, SD 2.56) than interventions with no impact on outcomes (mean 3.57, SD 1.95) or those that used >1 outcome measure or analytic approach (mean 3.90, SD 1.93; P=.02). The following BCTs were associated with positive outcomes: self-monitoring outcomes of behavior (39/59, 66%), feedback on outcomes of behavior (34/59, 58%), self-monitoring of behavior (34/59, 58%), feedback on behavior (29/59, 49%), credible source (24/59, 41%), and goal setting (behavior; 14/59, 24%). In adult-only samples, prompts and cues were associated with positive outcomes (34/45, 76%). In adolescent and young adult samples, information about health consequences (1/4, 25%), problem-solving (1/4, 25%), and material reward (behavior; 2/4, 50%) were associated with positive outcomes. In interventions explicitly targeting medicine taking, prompts and cues (25/33, 76%) and credible source (13/33, 39%) were associated with positive outcomes. In interventions focused on self-management and other adherence targets, instruction on how to perform the behavior (8/26, 31%), goal setting (behavior; 8/26, 31%), and action planning (5/26, 19%) were associated with positive outcomes. Conclusions: To support adherence and self-management in people with complex medical conditions, mHealth tools should purposefully incorporate effective and developmentally appropriate BCTs. A cross-cutting approach to BCT selection could accelerate the development of much-needed mHealth interventions for target populations, although mHealth intervention developers should continue to consider the unique needs of the target population when designing these tools.

Thiomersal enhances the binding of histamine to the H1 receptor, but not histamine-stimulated inositol phosphate formation.

Thiomersal (thimerosal) was a weak inhibitor of the binding of [(3)H]mepyramine to histamine H(1) receptors in guinea-pig cerebellar membranes (11 +/- 1% inhibition at 10 microM, 32 +/- 3% inhibition at 300 microM). However, in the concentration range 3-30 microM, thiomersal enhanced the binding of histamine to the H(1) receptor, as reflected by the displacement of curves of histamine inhibition of [(3)H]mepyramine binding to lower concentrations, without any change in the Hill coefficient. The ratio of the IC50 values (the concentration giving 50% inhibition) in the absence and presence of thiomersal increased from 1.8 with 3 microM to 3.6 with 30 microM thiomersal. There was no consistent effect of thiomersal at concentrations of 30 microM and below on curves of mepyramine inhibition of [(3)H]mepyramine binding. In the presence of 10 microM thiomersal histamine-induced accumulation of inositol phosphates in U373 MG astrocytoma cells was partially inhibited (37 +/- 8% inhibition of the maximum response), without any significant change in the EC50 (the concentration giving the half maximal response) for histamine. Thus although histamine binding was potentiated by thiomersal, there was no potentiation of an H(1) receptor-mediated functional response.