ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fluctuating symptoms and side effects are common during outpatient cancer treatment, and approaches to monitoring symptoms vary widely across providers, patients, and clinical settings. To design a remote symptom monitoring system that patients and providers find to be useful, it may be helpful to understand current clinical approaches to monitoring and managing chemotherapy-related symptoms among patients and providers and assess how more frequent and systematic assessment and sharing of data could improve patient and provider experiences. OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to learn about patient and provider perspectives on monitoring symptoms during chemotherapy, understand barriers and challenges to effective symptom monitoring at one institution, and explore the potential value of remote symptom monitoring between provider visits. METHODS: A total of 15 patients who were currently undergoing or had recently completed chemotherapy and 7 oncology providers participated in semistructured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded using an iterative thematic analysis approach. The study was conducted at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. RESULTS: Four main themes were discussed by patients and providers: (1) asynchronous nature of current methods for tracking and managing symptoms, (2) variability in reported symptoms due to patient factors, (3) limitations of existing communication channels, and (4) potential value of real-time remote symptom monitoring during chemotherapy. Current asynchronous methods and existing communication channels resulted in a disconnect between when symptoms are most severe and when conversations about symptoms happen, a situation further complicated by memory impairments during chemotherapy. Patients and providers both highlighted improvements in patient-provider communication as a potential benefit of remote real-time symptom monitoring. Providers also emphasized the value of temporal data regarding when symptoms first emerge and how they progress over time, as well as the potential value of concurrent activity or other data about daily activities and functioning. Patients noted that symptom monitoring could result in better preparation for subsequent treatment cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Both patients and providers highlighted significant challenges of asynchronous, patient-initiated, phone-dependent symptom monitoring and management. Oncology patients and providers reported that more routine remote monitoring of symptoms between visits could improve patient-provider communication, prepare patients for subsequent chemotherapy cycles, and facilitate provider insight and clinical decision-making with regard to symptom management.
ABSTRACT
AIM: Widespread clinical application of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has been limited by the need for lifelong systemic immunosuppression to prevent rejection. Our goal was to develop a site-specific immunosuppressive strategy that promotes VCA allograft survival and minimizes the risk of systemic side effects. METHODS: Tacrolimus loaded polycaprolactone (TAC-PCL) disks were prepared and tested for their efficacy in sustaining VCA allograft survival via site-specific immunosuppression. Brown Norway-to-Lewis rat hind limb transplantations were performed; animals received one TAC disk either in the transplanted (DTx) or in the contralateral non-transplanted (DnonTx) limbs. In another group, animals received DTx and lymphadenectomy on Tx side. Blood and allograft levels of TAC were measured using LC-MS/MS. Systemic toxicity was evaluated. RESULTS: Animals that received DTx achieved long-term allograft survival (> 200 days) without signs of metabolic and infectious complications. In these animals, TAC blood levels were low but stable between 2 to 5 ng/mL for nearly 100 days. High concentrations of TAC were achieved in the allografts and the draining lymph nodes (DLN). Animals that underwent lymphadenectomy rejected their allograft by 175 days. Animals that received DnonTx rejected their allografts by day 70. CONCLUSION: Controlled delivery of TAC directly within the allograft (with a single TAC disk) effectively inhibits rejection and prolongs VCA allograft survival, while mitigating the complications of systemic immunosuppression. There was a survival benefit of delivering TAC within the allograft as compared to a remote site. We believe this approach of local drug delivery has significant implications for drug administration in transplantation.
