Pharmacokinetic Profiles of a Proposed Biosimilar Ustekinumab (BFI-751): Results From a Randomized Phase 1 Trial.

BioFactura has developed a proposed biosimilar candidate (BFI-751) to ustekinumab reference product. Results are reported for the first-in-human trial designed to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles, safety, and immunogenicity of BFI-751 and ustekinumab reference products from the European Union and United States as well as similarity of the EU and US reference products. This was a multicenter, randomized, double blind, 3-parallel-group study (trial ID: NCT04843631). Healthy subjects were randomized to receive a single subcutaneous dose of 45 mg of BFI-751, EU ustekinumab, or US ustekinumab. The pharmacokinetic parameters were area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity, AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum concentration. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity data were also reported. Pairwise comparisons among the 3 treatments all met the standard bioequivalence criteria that the 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean ratios of AUC from time zero to infinity, AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum concentration are completely within the acceptance interval of 80%-125%. There were no marked differences in the safety and tolerability profiles for subjects receiving BFI-751 as compared to EU or US ustekinumab. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate for all treatment groups.

A randomized, double-blind, 3-arm, parallel study assessing the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of AVT04, an ustekinumab candidate biosimilar, in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity, safety, and immunogenicity of AVT04, a candidate biosimilar, compared with reference product (RP) ustekinumab (EU-approved and US-licensed Stelara®). METHODS: Healthy subjects (N = 298) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive one 45 mg dose of AVT04, EU-RP, or US-RP. The primary PK parameters were Cmax and AUC0-inf. PK similarity was demonstrated if the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of geometric means were all contained within the prespecified margins of 80% and 125%. Additional PK parameters, including AUC0-t, were also assessed. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed until Day 92. RESULTS: After pre-specified protein content normalization, the 90% CI for the ratio of geometric means for primary PK parameters were all contained within the pre-specified bioequivalence margins of 80% and 125%, supporting demonstration of PK similarity between AVT04 and both EU- and US-RP. Secondary PK parameters supported the analysis. Safety and immunogenicity profiles were comparable across all three treatment arms, although the study was not powered to detect small differences in these parameters. CONCLUSION: Results supported a demonstration of PK similarity between candidate biosimilar AVT04, US-RP and EU-RP. Similar safety and immunogenicity were also shown.Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT04744363.

Pharmacokinetic equivalence of CT-P39 and reference omalizumab in healthy individuals: A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: CT-P39 is being developed as a biosimilar of reference omalizumab. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of CT-P39 to European Union-approved and United States-licensed reference omalizumab (EU- and US-omalizumab, respectively). METHODS: This two-part, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind Phase 1 trial (NCT04018313) was conducted in healthy individuals with a total immunoglobulin E (IgE) level ≤100  international units (IU)/ml at screening. In part 2, described herein, participants were randomised (1:1:1) to receive a single 150 mg subcutaneous dose of CT-P39, EU-omalizumab, or US-omalizumab. The primary endpoint was pharmacokinetic equivalence in terms of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-last ), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf ), and maximum serum concentration (Cmax ). Equivalence was concluded if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric least-squares means ratios were contained within the predefined 80%-125% equivalence margin. Additional pharmacokinetic parameters, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 146 participants were randomised (CT-P39, N = 47; EU-omalizumab, N = 49; US-omalizumab, N = 50). For all primary pharmacokinetic parameters, 90% CIs for pairwise treatment comparisons were within the 80%-125% equivalence margin, demonstrating pharmacokinetic equivalence. Decreases in free IgE and increases in total IgE serum concentrations were comparable across groups. CT-P39 was well tolerated. Safety endpoints were comparable across groups: there were no treatment-related serious adverse events, deaths, or discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: CT-P39 was well tolerated and demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence with EU-omalizumab and US-omalizumab following administration of a single dose in healthy individuals.

TROIKA-1: A double-blind, randomized, parallel group, study aimed to demonstrate the equivalent pharmacokinetic profile of HD201, a potential biosimilar candidate to trastuzumab, versus EU-Herceptin® and US-Herceptin® in healthy male subjects.

Prestige Biopharma Ltd (Singapore) has developed HD201, a proposed biosimilar to reference product trastuzumab. As a part of the stepwise approach to ensure comparability between the biosimilar candidate and the reference medicinal product, a phase I study in healthy subjects was conducted to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence (NCT03776240). The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate (PK) equivalence of HD201, EU-Herceptin® , and US-Herceptin® given at 6 mg/kg as a 90-min i.v. infusion to healthy male subjects. A pairwise comparisons based on the primary endpoint AUC0-inf and secondary PK endpoints, AUC0-last and Cmax were undertaken. PK equivalence was to be concluded if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of geometric means for each criterion were within the equivalence margin of 80% to 125%. Secondary objectives included assessment of other PK parameters, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity in the three arms. A total of 105 healthy male subjects (35/treatment) were randomized in this study. The 90% CI for the ratios of AUC0-inf , Cmax and AUC0-last , were within 80%-125% for the comparisons of HD201 to EU-Herceptin® or US-Herceptin® and EU-Herceptin® to US-Herceptin® . The frequency of subjects with TEAEs of special interest was slightly lower in the HD201 group (20.0%) compared to the other treatment groups (EU-Herceptin® : 34.3%; US-Herceptin® : 31.4%). Only 1 subject (EU-Herceptin® group) developed anti-drug antibodies prior to dosing. Overall, HD201 demonstrates PK similarity to both EU-Herceptin® and US-Herceptin® . The three study drugs also demonstrated similar safety profiles.