Developing and sustaining specialist and advanced practice roles in nursing and midwifery: A discourse on enablers and barriers.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To collate, synthesise and discuss published evidence and expert professional opinion on enablers and barriers to the development and sustainability of specialist and advanced practice roles in nursing and midwifery. BACKGROUND: Expanded practice is a response to population health needs, healthcare costs and practitioners' willingness to expand their scope of practice through enhanced responsibility, accountability and professional autonomy. DESIGN: This discursive paper is based on a rapid review of literature on enablers and barriers to the development and sustainability of specialist and advanced practice roles and is part of a wider policy analysis. METHODS: We analysed and synthesised of 36 research articles, reviews and discussion papers on enablers and barriers in the development and sustainability of expanded practice roles. RESULTS: Several factors enable role expansion, including: role clarity; credentialing and endorsement; availability of education for expanded roles; individual practitioners' dispositions towards role expansion; support from peers, other professionals and the work organisation; and costs. Where limited or absent, these same factors can constrain role expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Enabling nurses and midwives to practice to their full scope of education and expertise is a global challenge for disciplinary leadership, a national challenge for professional regulation and a local challenge for employers and individual clinicians. These challenges need to be addressed through multistakeholder coordinated efforts at these four levels. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This discursive paper synthesises empirical evidence and expert professional opinion on the factors that enable or hinder the development and sustainability of specialist and advanced practice roles. Providing a critical appraisal of current knowledge, it provides a reference source for disciplinary debate and policy development regarding the nursing and midwifery resource and informs clinicians of the myriad issues that can impact on their capacity to expand their scope of practice.

The universal, collaborative and dynamic model of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practice: A way forward?

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To inform and guide the development of a future model of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practice. BACKGROUND: There is a sizable body of empirical literature supporting the unique contributions of specialist and advanced practice roles to health care. However, there is very little international evidence to inform the integration of a future model for advanced or specialist practice in the Irish healthcare system. DESIGN: A qualitative study was conducted to initiate this important area of inquiry. METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to generate a sample of informants (n = 15) for the interviews. Nurses and midwives working in specialist and advanced practice and participants from other areas such as legislative, regulatory, policy, medicine and education were included in the sampling frame. RESULTS: Arguments for a new model of specialist and advanced practice were voiced. A number of participants proposed that flexibility within specialist and advanced practitioner career pathways was essential. Otherwise, there existed the possibility of being directed into specialised "silos," precluding movement to another area of integrated practice. Future specialist and advanced practice education programmes need to include topics such as the development of emotional and political intelligence. CONCLUSION: The contribution of specialist and advanced practice roles to the health service includes providing rapid access to care, seamless patient flow across services, early discharge and lead coordinator of the patient's care trajectory. There was a recommendation of moving towards a universal model to cultivate specialist and advanced nurse and midwife practitioners. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The model design has Universal application in a range of contexts "U." It is Collaborative in its inclusivity of all key stakeholders "C." The model is Dynamic pertinent to accommodating movement of nurses and midwives across health continua rather than plateauing in very specialised "silos" "D."

The perceptions of key stakeholders of the roles of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practitioners.

AIM: To explore the perceptions of key stakeholders of the roles of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practitioners. BACKGROUND: There is evidence that the contribution of these roles to patient care is poorly understood. DESIGN: This research took place over 2 months in 2015 and is part of a larger study involving a rapid review to inform policy development on the specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practice in Ireland. As an added value, a qualitative element involving thematic analysis was undertaken with key stakeholders. METHODS: A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted incorporating semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (n = 15). Purposive sampling with maximum diversity was used to recruit a wide range of perspectives. FINDINGS: Participant's perspectives led to seven themes: Impact of these roles; role preparation, experience and organizational support; specialist and advanced practice roles in an interdisciplinary context; different folks but not such different roles; impact of specialist and advanced practice roles on patient outcomes; barriers and facilitators to enacting specialist and advanced practice roles; future development of these roles. CONCLUSION: There is acknowledgement of the positive impact of specialist and advanced practitioners; however, the evidence is currently not conclusive. Preparation for these roles needs to reflect changes in the calibre of today's professional applicants, and organizational support is paramount to their successful execution. The contribution of their activity to patient outcome needs to be made visible to enhance these roles and to justify the development of new roles across a variety of healthcare areas.

Using rapid reviews: an example from a study conducted to inform policy-making.

AIM: A discussion of the potential use of rapid review approaches in nursing and midwifery research which presents a worked example from a study conducted to inform policy decision-making. BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews, which can be defined as outputs of a knowledge synthesis approach that involves modifying or omitting elements of a systematic review process due to limited time or resources, are becoming increasingly popular in health research. This paper provides guidance on how a rapid review can be undertaken and discusses the strengths and challenges of the approach. DESIGN: Data from a rapid review of the literature undertaken in 2015 is used as a worked example to highlight one method of undertaking a rapid review. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Seeking evidence to inform health policy-making or evidence based practice is a process that can be limited by time constraints, making it difficult to conduct comprehensive systematic reviews. Rapid reviews provide a solution as they are a systematic method of synthesizing evidence quickly. CONCLUSIONS: There is no single best way to conduct a rapid review but researchers can ensure they are adhering to best practice by being systematic, having subject and methodological expertise on the review team, reporting the details of the approach they took, highlighting the limitations of the approach, engaging in good evidence synthesis and communicating regularly with end users, other team members and experts.

Service impact of a national clinical leadership development programme: findings from a qualitative study.

AIM: The study reported here was part of a larger study, which evaluated a national clinical leadership development programme with reference to resources, participant experiences, participant outcomes and service impact. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the programme's service impact. BACKGROUND: Clinical leadership development develops competencies that are expressed in context. The outcomes of clinical leadership development occur at individual, departmental and organisational levels. METHODS: The methods used to evaluate the service impact were focus groups, group interviews and individual interviews. Seventy participants provided data in 18 separate qualitative data collection events. RESULTS: The data contained numerous accounts of service development activities, initiated by programme participants, which improved service and/or improved the culture of the work setting. CONCLUSION: Clinical leadership development programmes that incorporate a deliberate service impact element can result in identifiable positive service outcomes. The nuanced relationship between leader development and service development warrants further investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This study demonstrates that clinical leadership development can impact on service in distinct and identifiable ways. Clinical leadership development programmes should focus on the setting in which the leadership competencies will be demonstrated.

Mentoring, coaching and action learning: interventions in a national clinical leadership development programme.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate mentoring, coaching and action learning interventions used to develop nurses' and midwives' clinical leadership competencies and to describe the programme participants' experiences of the interventions. BACKGROUND: Mentoring, coaching and action learning are effective interventions in clinical leadership development and were used in a new national clinical leadership development programme, introduced in Ireland in 2011. An evaluation of the programme focused on how participants experienced the interventions. DESIGN: A qualitative design, using multiple data sources and multiple data collection methods. METHODS: Methods used to generate data on participant experiences of individual interventions included focus groups, individual interviews and nonparticipant observation. Seventy participants, including 50 programme participants and those providing the interventions, contributed to the data collection. RESULTS: Mentoring, coaching and action learning were positively experienced by participants and contributed to the development of clinical leadership competencies, as attested to by the programme participants and intervention facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: The use of interventions that are action-oriented and focused on service development, such as mentoring, coaching and action learning, should be supported in clinical leadership development programmes. Being quite different to short attendance courses, these interventions require longer-term commitment on the part of both individuals and their organisations. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: In using mentoring, coaching and action learning interventions, the focus should be on each participant's current role and everyday practice and on helping the participant to develop and demonstrate clinical leadership skills in these contexts.

The visibility of the discipline on the websites of academic nursing schools.

Critical discourse analysis was used to examine the visibility of nursing as a distinct discipline on the websites of academic nursing schools in Ireland. The analysis focused on the content of the schools' websites, including the available undergraduate curricular materials. The websites of a purposive sample of academic nursing schools in Canada, Scandinavia, and Australia were also analyzed for comparative purposes. The texts revealed that the disciplinary distinctiveness of nursing was only minimally represented on nearly all of the Irish nursing schools' websites. There was little evidence that nursing theory was informing the form and content of nursing programs. Instead, there was evidence of eclecticism in their form and content, with much reliance on imported knowledge from other disciplines. In contrast, nursing's disciplinary specialism was coherently and clearly articulated in website texts of the selected Canadian, Scandinavian, and Australian schools. Representations of nursing on official websites convey important messages to prospective students and to the public about the self-conceptualisation of nursing, including its knowledge forms and knowledge claims.

Boundary matters: clinical leadership and the distinctive disciplinary contribution of nursing to multidisciplinary care.

AIMS: To describe Irish nurses' views of clinical leadership and to describe their clinical leadership development needs. BACKGROUND: Nurses are often unclear about the precise nature of clinical leadership and its impact on the processes and outcomes of care and little is known about their self-perceived clinical leadership development needs. DESIGN: Seventeen focus group interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 144 nurses from 13 practice settings. A conceptual lens was provided by the work of Bernstein and Young who emphasise the epistemological, practical and relational significance of boundaries and how they relate in fundamental ways to professionals' sense of their distinctive disciplinary identities and membership of specialised communities of practice. METHODS: Focus group data were collected using semi-structured topic guides. Analysis was facilitated by NVivo 7© and interpretation was informed by a conceptual framework arising from the interplay of emerging themes and the literature review. RESULTS: The implications for clinical leadership development of two critical concepts, 'representing nursing' and 'compensatory action', are discussed in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical leadership development should emphasise the development of all nurses as clinical leaders in the context of the delineation, clarification and articulation of their distinctive contribution in multidisciplinary care settings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clinical leaders are recognised as practice experts and as leaders in their particular fields. Recognition and influence in and beyond the immediate context of care depends greatly on their ability to articulate the distinct nursing contribution to patient care. This ability provides an essential resource to resist the ongoing blurring, effacement and dilution of nurses' roles.

Barriers to clinical leadership development: findings from a national survey.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe self-reported barriers to clinical leadership development among nurses and midwives in Ireland. BACKGROUND: Effective clinical leadership is essential for optimising care and improving patient outcomes. Clinical leadership development is concerned with intrapersonal and interpersonal capabilities and is context bound. Barriers to clinical leadership development among nurses and midwives are associated with interdisciplinary and organisational factors, such as lack of influence in interdisciplinary care planning and policy. DESIGN: A national postal survey of nurses and midwives was administered to a simple random sample of 3000 nurses and midwives in Ireland. METHOD: The method of data collection was the Clinical Leadership Analysis of Need Questionnaire (CLAN-Q) Barriers Scale (CLAN-QBS), a self-administered, self-report questionnaire developed to measure the barriers to clinical leadership development. RESULTS: Mean scores for the CLAN-Q barriers subscales showed that barriers to clinical leadership development were perceived as lower in the dimension 'quality care factors', when compared with the dimensions 'interdisciplinary relationships, recognition and influence'. Staff and other promotional grades differed significantly in self-perceived barriers related to interdisciplinary working, influence and recognition of the disciplinary contribution. CONCLUSIONS: Differential experiences of barriers among higher and lower grades suggest that grade level may influence ability to negotiate work-related and organisational barriers to clinical leadership development. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Overcoming the barriers to clinical leadership development requires attention to interdisciplinary relationships in the practicum and to the actual and perceived degree of relative influence that nurses and midwives have at wider departmental and organisational levels.

What lies beneath? The underlying principles structuring the field of academic nursing in Ireland.

This article reports the findings of a structural analysis of the field of academic nursing in Ireland and considers the implications of the field's current structure for its present status and future trajectory in the academy. Six years after preregistration nursing education transferred to the higher education sector, tensions continue to exist concerning the status and legitimacy of academic nursing and of those who profess to profess it. The languages of legitimation of senior nursing academics and national nursing leaders (n = 16) were elicited and subjected to a critical discourse analysis. Respondents' languages were analyzed in terms of the settings of four underlying structuring legitimation principles: autonomy, density, specialization, and temporality. Academic nursing in Ireland was found to be structured by low autonomy, high density, and weak specialization. I conclude that academic and professional leaders in Irish nursing need to urgently consider how academic nursing can reconfigure its relationships with clinical nursing, increase its intellectual autonomy, enhance its internal coherence and cohesiveness, strengthen the epistemic power of its knowledge base, and critically evaluate the ways in which past practices inform its present and whether and to what extent they should shape its future.

The health of hospitals and lessons from history: public health and sanitary reform in the Dublin hospitals, 1858-1898.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim was to examine, critically, 19th century hospital sanitary reform with reference to theories about infection and contagion. BACKGROUND: In the nineteenth century, measures to control epidemic diseases focused on providing clean water, removing waste and isolating infected cases. These measures were informed by the ideas of sanitary reformers like Chadwick and Nightingale, and hospitals were an important element of sanitary reform. DESIGN: Informed by the paradigmatic tradition of social history, the study design was a historical analysis of public health policy. METHOD: Using the methods of historical research, documentary primary sources, including official reports and selected hospital archives and related secondary sources, were consulted. RESULTS: Emerging theories about infection were informing official bodies like the Board of Superintendence of Dublin Hospitals in their efforts to improve hospital sanitation. The Board secured important reforms in hospital sanitation, including the provision of technically efficient sanitary infrastructure. CONCLUSIONS: Public health measures to control epidemic infections are only as effective as the state of knowledge of infection and contagion and the infrastructure to support sanitary measures. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Today, public mistrust about the safety of hospitals is reminiscent of that of 150 years ago, although the reasons are different and relate to a fear of contracting antimicrobial-resistant infections. A powerful historical lesson from this study is that resistance to new ideas can delay progress and improved sanitary standards can allay public mistrust. In reforming hospital sanitation, policies and regulations were established--including an inspection body to monitor and enforce standards--the benefits of which provide lessons that resonate today. Such practices, especially effective independent inspection, could be adapted for present-day contexts and re-instigated where they do not exist. History has much to offer contemporary policy development and practice reform and is a relevant method for health professionals.

Lost in transition?: a discursive analysis of academic nursing in Ireland.

A critical discourse analysis of Irish nurse academics' comments reveals a dependent, fragmented discipline with a weak academic infrastructure, prone to colonization by other discourses. Respondents lack a language that articulates an academic and professional nursing identity, the form and content of educational programs that are distinctively nursing, and lack the proper focus and scope of nursing research. These findings are discussed in light of the role of academic clinical practice and nursing discipline-specific discourses in providing the conditions of possibility for the establishment, maintenance, and reproduction of a critical mass of nurse scholars with both academic and clinical legitimacy.

Where is nursing in academic nursing? Disciplinary discourses, identities and clinical practice: a critical perspective from Ireland.

AIM: To elicit the languages of legitimation of senior nursing academics and national leaders and to investigate the extent to which distinctive disciplinary identities and discourses are embedded in them. BACKGROUND: Over six years after Irish nursing education became established in the higher education sector, an investigation into the disciplinary maturity of the field is overdue. DESIGN: A constructivist-structuralist research design was used; data were elicited by means of naturalistic professional conversations and subjected to critical discourse analytic methods to interrogate their structuring and structured character. The focus here is on the latter. METHODS: The languages of legitimation of Irish nursing's key disciplinary custodians were elicited and subjected to a critical discourse analysis informed by a theoretical framework that helps to explicate the bases of claims to academic legitimacy embedded in these languages. RESULTS: Clinical practice figures as a problematic component of Irish nursing's academic identity and disciplinary discourse. Yet a focus on clinical practice is seen as central to the autonomy, integrity and distinctiveness of nursing as an academic discipline as well as to the legitimacy and credibility of those who claim to profess it. The overall consensus on the state of academic nursing in Ireland is that of a field characterised by low autonomy, high density, weak specialisation and disciplinary immaturity. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis highlights the need for academic nursing to reconfigure its relationships with clinical nursing, increase its intellectual autonomy, enhance its internal coherence, strengthen the epistemic power of its knowledge base and critically evaluate the ways the past should inform current and future practices and identities. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The production and dissemination of knowledge for nursing policy and practice provides the foundation for nursing education. If clinical practice is not central to the educational and research activities of nurse academics, the relevance of academic nursing to its professional base and its status and future trajectory as a distinct presence in academia, will continue to be questioned.

Nursing academics' languages of legitimation: a discourse analysis.

AIM: To identify the proclaimed bases of Irish nursing academics' identities as academics and to interrogate the ways in which they legitimate nursing as an academic discipline. BACKGROUND: Six years after pre-registration nursing education in Ireland transferred to the higher education sector, tensions continue to exist concerning the status and legitimacy of the discipline and those who claim to profess it. METHOD: The languages of legitimation of senior nursing academics were elicited in the deliberately argumentative conversational context characteristic of many discourse analytic studies. These languages were analysed in terms of four of the building tasks of language: knowledge, politics, relationships and identities. FINDINGS: Irish nursing academics are unable to credibly and convincingly resist representations of their discipline as lacking legitimacy in academia. Indeed, they themselves construct academic nursing as a fragmented field, prone to colonisation and subversion by a plethora of other discourses, including medical, management and industrial relations discourses. CONCLUSIONS: Senior nursing academics in Ireland need to urgently consider how nursing in the academy can reconfigure its relationships with clinical nursing, increase its intellectual autonomy, enhance its internal coherence and cohesiveness, strengthen the epistemic power of its knowledge base and critically evaluate the ways in which past practices inform its present, and whether and to what extent they should shape its future.

Academic leadership in nursing: legitimating the discipline in contested spaces.

AIM: To investigate the potential of recent conceptual developments in the sociology of education for conceptualising academic leadership in nursing. BACKGROUND: During an investigation into the current status and future trajectory of academic nursing in Ireland, academic leadership emerged as a major concern for respondents. METHOD: The languages of legitimation of academic leaders were elicited in in-depth interviews and analysed as expressions of underlying legitimation principles. RESULTS: The concept of legitimation principles provides a way of thinking about how academic nursing is positioned in the health and higher education sectors, how its leaders construct its identity, practices and purposes, and clarifies the proper focus and goals of academic leadership in nursing. CONCLUSIONS: Academic leadership is concerned with legitimating the discipline of nursing as an autonomous, coherent and distinctive professional and academic endeavour. This legitimacy must be secured in academic, clinical and wider contexts in which academic nursing is viewed with ambivalence; leaders must take account of the impact of nursing history on the current status and future trajectory of the discipline. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP: The analytic tools facilitate a better understanding of the internal and external conditions under which academic nursing will flourish, or wither, in contemporary higher education.

Of bedpans and ivory towers? Nurse academics' identities and the sacred and profane: a Bernsteinian analysis and discussion paper.

AIM: In light of debates arising from recent developments in Irish nursing education, this paper analyses tensions in the positioning of nursing in academia in terms of notions of the sacred and profane, and the symbolic boundaries between them, and discusses the implications of this analysis for nurse academics' identities. BACKGROUND: The entry of nursing education to the higher education sector has occurred against a discursive backcloth of opposition which constructs nursing work as either sacred, and under threat from the academy, or profane, and unworthy of a place in it. METHOD: Conceptual resources derived from the work of Basil Bernstein are deployed to analyse the forces driving the loom weaving this discursive backcloth. These forces are conceptualised as deriving from deep-seated fears and anxieties sparked by changes in the strength of symbolically important boundaries between constructions of the sacred and profane in the fields of nursing and higher education. These constructions are explicated. FINDINGS: Bernstein regards secure academic identities as inhering in strong boundaries between disciplines and between the fields of education and work. The transfer of nursing education from health to the higher education sector and nurse academics' attempts to articulate a nursing-discipline specific knowledge base can be understood in these terms. This analysis challenges nurse academics who promote disciplinary eclecticism and those who legitimate academic nursing principally in terms of the acquisition of generic and transferable lifelong learning skills. CONCLUSIONS: To counter a discourse that constructs them as a profane presence in higher education, some nurse academics have articulated a discourse of legitimation that constructs (academic) nursing as a sacred endeavour. Whether this can provide the grounds of their legitimacy and the basis of their careers as distinctively nursing academics is unclear at this stage of nursing's development as an academic discipline.