Intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and M8 in HIV-infected patients: relationship with P-glycoprotein expression.

One of the targets of antiretroviral therapy is within cells infected with HIV. In order to improve therapeutic efficacy, it is therefore important that the intracellular pharmacokinetics of drugs, such as nelfinavir mesylate and its active metabolite M8, are studied in addition to plasma pharmacokinetics. Previously, the intracellular accumulation of protease inhibitors has been reported in vivo, displaying the following hierarchy: nelfinavir > saquinavir > ritonavir > indinavir. Multidrug resistance transporters, such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp), may result in a lower intracellular concentration of drug via an efflux mechanism, thus contributing to sanctuary site formation. The objective of this study was to determine concentrations of nelfinavir and M8 in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HIV-infected patients, and to ascertain the relationship between intracellular accumulation and lymphocyte P-gp expression. Venous blood samples from 12 HIV-infected patients (viral load <50 copies/ml) receiving nelfinavir (1250 mg twice daily) and dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy were collected over a full dosage interval (0, 2, 4, 8 and 12 h). Plasma and intracellular (cell-associated) drug concentrations were measured by HPLC-MS/MS. Drug exposure in plasma and cells was expressed as the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12h)), derived from non-compartmental modelling. The ratio of intracellular AUC(0-12h)/total plasma AUC(0-12h) was calculated to determine cellular drug accumulation. P-gp expression on lymphocytes was determined by flow cytometry. The median (range) AUC(0-12h) of nelfinavir in plasma and cellular compartments was 21.8 mg x h x l(-1) (5.64-50.8) and 104.6 mg x h x l(-1) (23.1-265.7), respectively. Corresponding values for M8 in plasma and cells were 6.60 mg x h x l(-1) (2.16-17.3) and 19.6 mg x h x l(-1) (5.14-60.8). A ratio of plasma M8/plasma nelfinavir (AUC(0-12h)) and intracellular M8/intracellular nelfinavir (AUC(0-12h)) gave median values of 0.32 and 0.17, respectively. The cellular accumulations [median; (range)] of nelfinavir and M8 were 5.30 (2.28-16.2) and 2.32 (1.01-10.7), respectively. A significant correlation between plasma and intracellular nelfinavir minimum concentration (Cmin) (r2=0.34; P=0.049), but not between plasma and intracellular M8 Cmin was observed. C(0h) concentrations were higher than C(12h) for both nelfinavir and M8. No relationship was observed between nelfinavir or M8 accumulation and lymphocyte cell surface expression of P-gp. This study illustrates that intracellular concentrations were higher than plasma concentrations for both nelfinavir and M8, suggesting lymphocyte accumulation. The mechanism of differential intracellular accumulation of nelfinavir and M8 remains to be elucidated. It may be that affinities for influx transporters or fundamental drug characteristics play a major role in the greater accumulation of nelfinavir than M8.

The unbound percentage of saquinavir and indinavir remains constant throughout the dosing interval in HIV positive subjects.

AIMS: To measure the unbound plasma concentrations of saquinavir (SQV) and indinavir (IDV) and to relate them to the total plasma concentrations in order to establish the unbound percentage of protease inhibitors in vivo during a full dosage interval profile. METHODS: HIV-infected subjects (n = 35; median CD4 cell count = 340 x 10(6) cells l-1, range: 120-825; viral load < 50 copies ml-1 in 22/35) treated with SQV or IDV containing regimens were studied. Plasma drug samples were collected at 0, 2, 4, 8 and 12 h postdose for the twice daily regimens and 0, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h for the three times daily regimens. Ultra-filtration was used to separate unbound IDV and SQV in plasma and their respective concentrations were measured by a fully validated method using high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectometry (h.p.l.c.-MS/MS). RESULTS: Based on the ratio AUCunbound/AUCtotal, the median unbound percentage (95% CI for differences) of SQV and IDV from all the samples studied was 1.19% (0.99, 1.58%) and 36.3% (35.1, 44.2%), respectively. No significant difference was seen in the percentage binding of SQV between patients receiving SQV alone (median = 1.49%) or with ritonavir (median = 1.09%; P = 0.141; 95% CI for difference between medians = -0.145, 0.937) over the pharmacokinetic profile. Similarly, no significant difference was seen in the percentage binding of IDV in patients receiving IDV alone (median 35.2%) or with ritonavir (median = 41.3%; P = 0.069; 95% CI for difference between medians = -0.09, 15.4). The unbound concentrations of SQV (P < 0.0001; 95% CI for r(2) = 0.634, 0.815) and IDV (P < 0.0001; 95% CI for r(2) = 0.830, 0.925) remained constant as a proportion of total concentration over the full dosing profile. CONCLUSIONS: These in vivo data confirm previously published in vitro measurements of SQV and IDV protein binding. The unbound percentage of both protease inhibitors remained constant over the dosing interval.

Intracellular accumulation of human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors.

Intracellular accumulation of the protease inhibitors (PIs) saquinavir (SQV), ritonavir (RTV), and indinavir (IDV) was determined in 50 human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. Following extraction, PIs were quantified by mass spectrometry. Paired plasma and intracellular samples were collected over a full dosing interval from patients (13 on SQV, 6 on RTV, 8 on IDV, 16 on SQV plus RTV, 7 on IDV plus RTV) with a plasma viral load of <400 copies/ml. Data were expressed as intracellular/plasma drug concentration ratios. A hierarchy of intracellular accumulation was demonstrated by the following medians: 9.45 for SQV > 1.00 for RTV > 0.51 for IDV. Coadministration of RTV did not boost ratios of SQV or IDV within the cell or in plasma, although absolute plasma and intracellular SQV concentrations were increased by RTV. Seven individuals receiving SQV in hard-gel capsule form (median, 32 months) had higher intracellular/plasma drug ratios than all other patients receiving SQV (median, 17.62 versus 4.83; P = 0.04), despite consistently low plasma SQV concentrations. How this occurs may provide insight into the mechanisms that limit adequate drug penetration into sanctuary sites.