Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 114(4): 677-82, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25501722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Classic teaching suggests that diminished availability of oxygen leads to increased tissue oxygen extraction yet evidence to support this notion in the context of hypoxaemia, as opposed to anaemia or cardiac failure, is limited. METHODS: At 75 m above sea level, and after 7-8 days of acclimatization to 4559 m, systemic oxygen extraction [C(a-v)O2] was calculated in five participants at rest and at peak exercise. Absolute [C(a-v)O2] was calculated by subtracting central venous oxygen content (CcvO2) from arterial oxygen content [Formula: see text] in blood sampled from central venous and peripheral arterial catheters, respectively. Oxygen uptake [Formula: see text] was determined from expired gas analysis during exercise. RESULTS: Ascent to altitude resulted in significant hypoxaemia; median (range) [Formula: see text] 87.1 (82.5-90.7)% and [Formula: see text] 6.6 (5.7-6.8) kPa. While absolute C(a-v)O2 was reduced at maximum exercise at 4559 m [83.9 (67.5-120.9) ml litre(-1) vs 99.6 (88.0-151.3) ml litre(-1) at 75 m, P=0.043], there was no change in oxygen extraction ratio (OER) [C(a-v)O2/CaO2] between the two altitudes [0.52 (0.48-0.71) at 4559 m and 0.53 (0.49-0.73) at 75 m, P=0.500]. Comparison of C(a-v)O2 at peak [Formula: see text] at 4559 m and the equivalent [Formula: see text] at sea level for each participant also revealed no significant difference [83.9 (67.5-120.9) ml litre(1) vs 81.2 (73.0-120.7) ml litre(-1), respectively, P=0.225]. CONCLUSION: In acclimatized individuals at 4559 m, there was a decline in maximum absolute C(a-v)O2 during exercise but no alteration in OER calculated using central venous oxygen measurements. This suggests that oxygen extraction may have become limited after exposure to 7-8 days of hypoxaemia.


Subject(s)
Altitude , Exercise , Oxygen/metabolism , Acclimatization , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Oxygen Consumption
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 109(4): 566-71, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22810563

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For several types of non-cardiac surgery, the cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)-derived variables anaerobic threshold (AT), peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak), and ventilatory equivalent for CO(2) (VE/VCO2 ) are predictive of increased postoperative risk: less physically fit patients having a greater risk of adverse outcome. We investigated this relationship in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. METHODS: All patients (<190 kg) who were referred for CPET and underwent elective gastric bypass surgery at the Whittington Hospital NHS Trust between September 1, 2009, and February 25, 2011, were included in the study (n=121). Fifteen patients did not complete CPET. CPET variables (VO2 peak, AT, and VE/VCO2 ) were derived for 106 patients. The primary outcome variables were day 5 morbidity and hospital length of stay (LOS). The independent t-test and Fisher's exact test were used to test for differences between surgical outcome groups. The predictive capacity of CPET markers was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The AT was lower in patients with postoperative complications than in those without [9.9 (1.5) vs 11.1 (1.7) ml kg(-1) min(-1), P=0.049] and in patients with a LOS>3 days compared with LOS ≤ 3 days [10.4 (1.4) vs 11.3 (1.8) ml kg(-1) min(-1), P=0.023]. ROC curve analysis identified AT as a significant predictor of LOS>3 days (AUC 0.640, P=0.030). The VO2 peak and VE/VCO2 were not associated with postoperative outcome. CONCLUSIONS: AT, determined using CPET, predicts LOS after gastric bypass surgery.


Subject(s)
Exercise Test/methods , Gastric Bypass , Adult , Anaerobic Threshold/physiology , Area Under Curve , Body Weight/physiology , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Patient Readmission , Physical Fitness , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...