Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Appl Microbiol ; 118(5): 1083-95, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25692216

ABSTRACT

Q fever is a zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Coxiella burnetii which is endemic in cattle, sheep and goats in much of the world, including the United Kingdom (UK). There is some epidemiological evidence that a small proportion of cases in the developed world may arise from consumption of unpasteurised milk with less evidence for milk products such as cheese. Long maturation at low pH may give some inactivation in hard cheese, and viable C. burnetii are rarely detected in unpasteurised cheese compared to unpasteurised milk. Simulations presented here predict that the probability of exposure per person to one or more C. burnetii through the daily cumulative consumption of raw milk in the UK is 0·4203. For those positive exposures, the average level of exposure predicted is high at 1266 guinea pig intraperitoneal infectious dose 50% units (GP_IP_ID50 ) per person per day. However, in the absence of human dose-response data, the case is made that the GP_IP_ID50 unit represents a very low risk through the oral route. The available evidence suggests that the risks from C. burnetii through consumption of unpasteurised milk and milk products (including cheese) are not negligible but they are lower in comparison to transmission via inhalation of aerosols from parturient products and livestock contact.


Subject(s)
Coxiella burnetii/isolation & purification , Dairy Products/microbiology , Food Contamination/analysis , Milk/microbiology , Q Fever/microbiology , Animals , Coxiella burnetii/genetics , Coxiella burnetii/physiology , Humans , Pasteurization , Q Fever/transmission , United Kingdom , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Zoonoses/microbiology , Zoonoses/transmission
3.
J Gen Virol ; 95(Pt 5): 1005-1014, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24552787

ABSTRACT

In Europe and Asia, Ixodid ticks transmit tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), a flavivirus that causes severe encephalitis in humans but appears to show no virulence for livestock and wildlife. In the British Isles, where TBEV is absent, a closely related tick-borne flavivirus, named louping ill virus (LIV), is present. However, unlike TBEV, LIV causes a febrile illness in sheep, cattle, grouse and some other species, that can progress to fatal encephalitis. The disease is detected predominantly in animals from upland areas of the UK and Ireland. This distribution is closely associated with the presence of its arthropod vector, the hard tick Ixodes ricinus. The virus is a positive-strand RNA virus belonging to the genus Flavivirus, exhibiting a high degree of genetic homology to TBEV and other mammalian tick-borne viruses. In addition to causing acute encephalomyelitis in sheep, other mammals and some avian species, the virus is recognized as a zoonotic agent with occasional reports of seropositive individuals, particularly those whose occupation involves contact with sheep. Preventative vaccination in sheep is effective although there is no treatment for disease. Surveillance for LIV in Great Britain is limited despite an increased awareness of emerging arthropod-borne diseases and potential changes in distribution and epidemiology. This review provides an overview of LIV and highlights areas where further effort is needed to control this disease.


Subject(s)
Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne/isolation & purification , Encephalitis, Tick-Borne/epidemiology , Encephalitis, Tick-Borne/veterinary , Endemic Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Animals , Animals, Domestic , Encephalitis, Tick-Borne/virology , Humans , Ixodes/virology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Zoonoses/virology
4.
Vet Rec ; 171(6): 153, 1-5, 2012 Aug 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22791519

ABSTRACT

A faecal egg count reduction test, using composite samples, was developed in order to assess the efficacy of the flukicide, triclabendazole (TCBZ) on commercial sheep farms in England and Wales. First, a comparison between individual counts and composite counts was conducted using sheep on two farms with different levels of infection. Faecal samples were collected from 50 sheep on each farm at the time of TCBZ treatment and 21 days later. The results showed that a composite fluke egg count (CFEC) was as sensitive as using individual samples, and the test was subsequently validated on an additional 18 sheep farms. The pre- and post-treatment CFECs using five composite samples were subjected to bootstrap analysis. The variance in fluke egg counts of composite samples was high, but analyses indicated that 20 individual samples analysed as two composites was as sensitive as using five composites. The two-composite assay was evaluated on another five farms. On seven out of 25 farms sampled, egg counts either did not decrease significantly or increased following treatment, suggesting TCBZ resistance on these farms. This assay represents a practical field test that can be used in the first instance to evaluate the efficacy of TCBZ on sheep farms where resistance is suspected.


Subject(s)
Anthelmintics/pharmacology , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Drug Resistance , Fasciola hepatica/drug effects , Feces/parasitology , Parasite Egg Count/veterinary , Animals , England , Fasciola hepatica/growth & development , Fascioliasis/drug therapy , Fascioliasis/parasitology , Fascioliasis/veterinary , Female , Male , Parasite Egg Count/methods , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/drug therapy , Sheep Diseases/parasitology , Triclabendazole , Wales
8.
Disasters ; 22(3): 185-99, 1998 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9753810

ABSTRACT

The context of famine in Turkana has changed in recent years as the role played by livestock raiding in contributing to famine has increased. External responses to famine in Turkana have largely been drought driven, for example, food assistance and livestock restocking programmers, which have failed to meet the real needs of herders. The role of armed conflict in the form of raiding has been overlooked as a common feature of societies facing famine and food insecurity. The traditional livelihood-enhancing functions of livestock raiding are contrasted with the more predatory forms common today. The direct impact of raiding on livelihood security can be devastating, while the threat of raids and measures taken to cope with this uncertainty undermine herders' livelihood strategies. Self-imposed restrictions on mobility negatively affect the vegetation of both grazed and ungrazed pastures and restrict the available survival strategies. Predatory raiding leads to a collapse in the moral economy. Some implications of this for relief and development policy are considered, including approaches to conflict resolution.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry , Animals, Domestic , Disasters , Starvation , Violence , Animals , Culture , Humans , Kenya , Relief Work/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...