Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 31(3): 593-601, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22392671

ABSTRACT

Amid international concerns about health care safety and quality, there has been an escalation of investigations by health care regulators into adverse events. England has a powerful central health care regulator, the Care Quality Commission, which conducts occasional high-profile investigations into major lapses in quality at individual hospitals. The results have sometimes garnered considerable attention from the news media, but it is not known what effect the investigations have had on patients' behavior. We analyzed trends in admission for discretionary (nonemergency) care at three hospitals that were subject to high-profile investigations by the Healthcare Commission (the predecessor to the Care Quality Commission) between 2006 and 2009. We found that investigations had no impact on utilization for two of the hospitals; in the third hospital, there were significant declines in inpatient admissions, outpatient surgeries, and in numbers of patients coming for their first appointment, but the effects disappeared six months after publication of the investigation report. Thus, the publication and dissemination of highly critical reports by a health care regulator does not appear to have resulted in patients' sustained avoidance of the hospitals that were investigated. Our findings reinforce other evaluations: Reporting designed to affect providers' reputations is likely to spur more improvement in quality and safety than relying on patients to choose their providers based on quality and safety reports, and simplistic assumptions regarding the power of information to drive patient choices are unrealistic.


Subject(s)
Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/trends , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Attitude to Health , Choice Behavior , England , Hospitals/standards , Humans , Information Dissemination , Patient Safety/standards
2.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 23(6): 637-44, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21846732

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Many approaches to measuring quality in healthcare exist, generally employing indicators or metrics. While there are important differences, most of these approaches share three key areas of measurement: safety, effectiveness and patient experience. The European Partnership for Supervisory Organisations in Health Services and Social Care (EPSO) exists as a working group and discussion forum for European regulators. This group undertook to identify a common framework within which European approaches to indicators could be compared. APPROACH: A framework was developed to classify indicators, using four sets of criteria: conceptualization of quality, Donabedian definition (structure, process, outcome), data type (derivable, collectable from routine sources, special collections, samples) and data use (judgement (singular or part of framework) benchmarking, risk assessment). Indicators from English and Dutch hospital measurement programmes were put into the framework, showing areas of agreement and levels of comparability. In the first instance, results are only illustrative. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The EPSO has been a powerful driver for undertaking cross-European research, and this project is the first of many to take advantage of the access to international expertize. It has shown that through development of a framework that deconstructs national indicators, commonalities can be identified. Future work will attempt to incorporate other nations' indicators, and attempt cross-national comparison.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Quality Indicators, Health Care/classification , Advisory Committees , Consensus , Data Collection/methods , England , Hospitals , Netherlands , Pilot Projects , Quality of Health Care/standards
3.
J Health Serv Res Policy ; 15(4): 236-42, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20371575

ABSTRACT

Gaming of performance measurement in health care distorts performance, making it appear better than it is. This can conceal potentially hazardous practice and endanger patients and staff. Research has investigated and categorized this behaviour but as yet has offered little in the way of potential solutions as the drivers are still not well understood. Studies of the psychology of tax behaviour, specifically tax avoidance and evasion, reveal some insights into what the underlying causes are. Looking at health care and tax compliance, seven similarities in response can be detected: negative view of those subject to it; not salient except for specific classes of people; general understanding of the need versus resentment of actuality; cognitive dissonance; moral versus legal grey areas; two levels of objective non-compliance; and four categories of subjective behaviour and attitude. We suggest a model of reaction and compliance for gaming and offer some suggestions as to how this phenomenon might be minimized.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Morals , Taxes/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Competence , England , Health Policy , Humans , Quality Indicators, Health Care , State Medicine
4.
Child Adolesc Ment Health ; 15(4): 186-192, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32847199

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The NICE ADHD Guideline Group found a lack of research evidence on young people's experiences with stimulant medications. The present study was commissioned to help fill this gap in the evidence base and to inform the Guideline. METHOD: Focus groups and 1:1 interviews with 16 UK young people with ADHD. RESULTS: Young people were positive about taking medication, feeling that it reduced their disruptive behaviour and improved their peer relationships. Young people experienced stigma but this was related more to their symptomatic behaviours than to stimulant drug medication. CONCLUSIONS: The study's findings helped to inform the NICE guideline on ADHD by providing evidence that young people's experiences of medication were in general more positive than negative. All NICE Guidelines involving recommendations for the treatment of young people should draw on research evidence of young people's experiences of treatments.

5.
Br J Psychiatry ; 193(2): 156-60, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18670003

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Expert clinical judgement combines technical proficiency with humanistic qualities. AIMS: To test the psychometric properties of questionnaires to assess the humanistic qualities of working with colleagues and relating to patients using multisource feedback. METHOD: Analysis of self-ratings by 347 consultant psychiatrists and ratings by 4422 colleagues and 6657 patients. RESULTS: Mean effectiveness as rated by self, colleagues and patients, was 4.6, 5.0 and 5.2 respectively (where 1=very low and 6=excellent). The instruments are internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha >0.95). Principal components analysis of the colleague questionnaire yielded seven factors that explain 70.2% of the variance and accord with the domain structure. Colleague and patient ratings correlate with one another (r=0.39, P<0.001) but not with the self-rating. Ratings from 13 colleagues and 25 patients are required to achieve a generalisability coefficient (Erho(2)) of 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable 360-degree assessment of humane judgement is feasible for psychiatrists who work in large multiprofessional teams and who have large case-loads.


Subject(s)
Psychiatry , Self-Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence/standards , Consultants , Humans , Mental Health Services/standards , Peer Review, Health Care/methods , Peer Review, Health Care/standards , Physician-Patient Relations , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Psychometrics/methods , Psychometrics/standards , Statistics as Topic
6.
Br J Psychiatry ; 188: 75-80, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16388074

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that social workers experience high levels of stress and burnout but most remain committed to their work. AIMS: To examine the prevalence of stress and burnout, and job satisfaction among mental health social workers (MHSWs) and the factors responsible for this. METHOD: A postal survey incorporating the General Health Questionnaire, Maslach Burnout Inventory, Karasek Job Content Questionnaire and a job satisfaction measure was sent to 610 MHSWs in England and Wales. RESULTS: Eligible respondents (n=237) reported high levels of stress and emotional exhaustion and low levels of job satisfaction; 111 (47%) showed significant symptomatology and distress, which is twice the level reported by similar surveys of psychiatrists. Feeling undervalued at work, excessive job demands, limited latitude in decision-making, and unhappiness about the place of MHSWs in modern services contributed to the poor job satisfaction and most aspects of burnout. Those who had approved social worker status had greater dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Stress may exacerbate recruitment and retention problems. Employers must recognise the demands placed upon MHSWs and value their contribution to mental health services.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/etiology , Community Mental Health Services , Health Personnel/psychology , Job Satisfaction , Social Work , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological , Surveys and Questionnaires , Wales/epidemiology
7.
Health Soc Care Community ; 13(2): 145-54, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15717916

ABSTRACT

In the UK, applications for involuntary admission to psychiatric units are made mainly by specially trained approved social workers (ASWs). Proposed changes in the legislation will permit other professionals to undertake these statutory duties. This study aimed to examine how ASW status impacts upon work pattern and workload stresses by comparing ASWs with other mental health social workers who did not carry statutory responsibilities. A multimethod design was adopted that included a cross-sectional national survey of mental health social workers (n=237, including 162 ASWs), and a telephone survey of mental health service managers (n=60). Data were collected using a semistructured questionnaire and diary, the content of which was derived from focus-group work and standard measures. Features of job content, working patterns and conditions were described and their association with stress, burnout and job satisfaction examined. ASWs were older and had been qualified longer than non-ASWs. The working patterns and conditions of the two groups did not differ, although ASWs did more hours on duty. ASWs received less support at work, particularly from supervisors and their role afforded less decision latitude than that of non-ASWs. ASW status was related to an elevated GHQ score, particularly among males. Emotional exhaustion was very high (over two-thirds in both groups) but ASWs and non-ASWs did not differ in this or any other feature of burnout, only 8% of the sample were actually 'burnt-out', being more common among ASWs. ASWs were more dissatisfied and were more likely than non-ASWs to want to leave their job. Given that ASW status increased stress and job dissatisfaction, especially for men, and was related to a desire to leave one's current job, it seems likely that extending statutory duties to other professionals will increase levels of stress, burnout and dissatisfaction in these groups also. In turn, this might have consequences for staff recruitment and retention.


Subject(s)
Administrative Personnel/psychology , Allied Health Personnel/psychology , Commitment of Mentally Ill/legislation & jurisprudence , Community Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Social Work, Psychiatric , Adult , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Community Mental Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Focus Groups , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Middle Aged , Social Work, Psychiatric/legislation & jurisprudence , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom , Workforce , Workload/psychology
8.
Child Adolesc Ment Health ; 8(3): 131-134, 2003 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32797575

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This project surveyed the use of the Children Act and the Mental Health Act in in-patient child and adolescent mental health services in England and Wales. METHODS: Data were collected as a day census from child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient units, questionnaire forms completed by consultant psychiatrists or key-workers. Returns were received from 71 of the 80 units. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven of the 663 patients had been admitted formally, the great majority under a section of the Mental Health Act. Compared with those admitted informally, those admitted formally were older, contained a higher proportion of males and had 'adult-type diagnoses', mainly schizophrenia, mood disorders and personality disorder. The clinical and psychosocial characteristics of formal and informal patients were consistent with these differences. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a timely and useful snapshot of the use of the Acts in this population.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...