Two novel recessive mutations in KRT14 identified in a cohort of 21 Spanish families with epidermolysis bullosa simplex.

BACKGROUND: Basal epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) is a group of blistering genodermatoses mostly caused by mutations in the keratin genes, KRT5 and KRT14. Recessive mutations represent about 5% of all EBS mutations, being common and specific in populations with high consanguinity, where affected patients show severe phenotypes. OBJECTIVES: To accomplish the first mutational analysis in patients of Spanish origin with EBS and to delineate a comprehensive genotype-phenotype correlation. METHODS: Twenty-one EBS families were analysed. Immunofluorescence mapping at the dermoepidermal junction level was performed on skin biopsies from patients. Mutation screening of the entire coding sequences of KRT5 and KRT14 in genomic DNA was assessed by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing. RESULTS: KRT5 or KRT14 causative mutations were identified in 18 of the 21 EBS families. A total of 14 different mutations were disclosed, of which 12 were dominant missense mutations and two truncating recessive mutations. Five of the 14 mutations were novel including three dominant in KRT5 (p.V186E, p.T321P and p.A428T) and two recessive in KRT14 (p.K116X and p.K250RfsX8). The two patients with EBS carrying homozygous recessive mutations were affected by severe phenotypes and belonged to consanguineous families. All five families with the EBS Dowling-Meara subtype carried recurrent mutations affecting the highly conserved ends of the α-helical rod domain of K5 and K14. The seven mutations associated with the localized EBS subtype were widely distributed along the KRT5 and KRT14 genes. Two families with mottled pigmentation carried the P25L mutation in KRT5, commonly associated with this subtype. CONCLUSIONS: This study further confirms the genotype-phenotype correlation established for EBS in other ethnic groups, and is the first in a Mediterranean country (excluding Israel). This study adds two novel recessive mutations to the worldwide record to date, which includes a total of 14 mutations. As in previous reports, the recessive mutations resulted in a lack of keratin K14, giving rise to a generalized and severe presentation.

Congenital disseminated neurofibromatosis type 1: a clinical and molecular case report.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant condition with a birth incidence of 1/3,500. Around 50% of cases are due to new mutations. The NF1 gene maps to 17q11.2 and encodes neurofibromin. NF1 is a "classical" tumor suppressor gene. Congenital disseminated NF1 is rare with just two cases previously reported. We present a deceased baby with congenital disseminated NF1 in whom we performed molecular studies. A germline mutation (R461X) in exon 10a of the NF1 gene was found. A 2 bp deletion (3508delCA) in codon 1170 of exon 21 was identified in DNA derived from some tumor tissue. Loss of heterozygosity in NF1 and TP53 was observed in other tumor samples. No microsatellite instability was observed in the tumor samples. This is the first report of molecular analysis of the NF1 locus in a patient with disseminated congenital neurofibromatosis. This case had a de novo germline mutation in NF1 and three documented somatic mutations in the NF1 and TP53 genes in tumor specimens.

Development of a multiplex ARMS test for mutations in the HFE gene associated with hereditary haemochromatosis.

Genetic testing for hereditary haemochromatosis is likely to be a significant workload for diagnostic laboratories. The C282Y and H63D mutations in the HFE gene associated with hereditary haemochromatosis have previously been detected using a number of methods including alterations in the restriction digest pattern of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified products. An amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) has been developed that will simultaneously detect both hereditary haemochromatosis mutations. Comparison of the results obtained from the analysis of 46 samples referred for hereditary haemochromatosis testing showed no discrepancies between ARMS and restriction enzyme digestion. Furthermore, consistent results were obtained by ARMS from both blood and buccal mouthwash samples. The ARMS test is quicker and less expensive in terms of consumables and scientist time than restriction enzyme analysis, and is therefore suited to the routine diagnostic analysis of hereditary haemochromatosis.