Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Equine Vet J ; 24(6): 436-42, 1992 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1459056

ABSTRACT

The medical records of 192 horses with septic arthritis/tenosynovitis 1979-1989 were reviewed. Forty-three horses developed infection after an intra-articular injection, 46 following a penetrating wound, 25 following surgery, 66 were foals less than 6 months old, and 12 were adult horses without a known aetiology. Haematogenous infection of a joint occurs in adult horses and should be considered as a differential diagnosis in horses with an acute onset of severe lameness. The aetiology of the infection had a significant effect on the type of bacteria identified by culture. Staphylococcus was cultured from most of the horses that developed infection following a joint injection or surgery, 69% of the horses from which an organism was identified. Horses that developed infection secondary to a penetrating wound frequently provided cultures of more than one organism; Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes were more frequently isolated in this group. The most common organisms isolated from foals were Enterobacteriaceae; E. coli was identified in more than 27% of the foals. The hock was the most frequently involved joint. Multiple treatments were used over the 10-year period of study. Survival rates were lowest in foals; only 45% survived to be released from the hospital. Survival was greater in adult horses; 85% of the horses that were treated were released from the hospital. Survival was significantly greater in horses with septic tenosynovitis; all 14 of the horses that were treated survived. Survival was not significantly affected by the joint involved or by the type of bacteria cultured from the synovial fluid.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Infectious/veterinary , Horse Diseases , Tenosynovitis/veterinary , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Infectious/diagnosis , Arthritis, Infectious/microbiology , Arthritis, Infectious/therapy , Carpus, Animal , Debridement , Drainage/veterinary , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/diagnosis , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/therapy , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/veterinary , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hindlimb , Horse Diseases/diagnosis , Horse Diseases/microbiology , Horse Diseases/therapy , Horses , Leukocyte Count/veterinary , Male , Retrospective Studies , Tenosynovitis/diagnosis , Tenosynovitis/microbiology , Tenosynovitis/therapy , Therapeutic Irrigation/veterinary , Treatment Outcome
2.
Equine Vet J ; 24(6): 443-9, 1992 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1459057

ABSTRACT

Open drainage was used to treat 26 horses with persistent or severe septic arthritis/tenosynovitis. Infected synovial structures were drained through a small (3 cm) arthrotomy incision that was left open and protected by a sterile bandage. Joint lavage was performed in all 26 horses. In addition to systemic antibiotics, 23 of these horses were also treated with intra-articular antibiotics; amikacin (17 horses), gentamycin (2 horses), cefazolin (2 horses), and 2 horses were injected at different times with gentamycin and amikacin. The infection was eliminated from the involved synovial structures in 25 of 26 horses; 24 survived and were released from the hospital. The arthrotomy incisions healed by granulation in 16 horses; in 9 horses the arthrotomy incision was sutured closed once the infection was eliminated. Seventeen horses returned to soundness and resumed athletic function. Open drainage was an effective method of achieving chronic drainage from a joint or tendon sheath. It is indicated in horses that have established intra-synovial infections or in horses that do not respond to joint lavage through needles.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Infectious/veterinary , Drainage/veterinary , Horse Diseases/surgery , Tenosynovitis/veterinary , Amikacin/administration & dosage , Amikacin/therapeutic use , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Infectious/drug therapy , Arthritis, Infectious/surgery , Bandages/veterinary , Cefazolin/administration & dosage , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Debridement/veterinary , Follow-Up Studies , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Horse Diseases/drug therapy , Horses , Injections, Intra-Articular/veterinary , Injections, Intravenous/veterinary , Penicillins/administration & dosage , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Postoperative Care/veterinary , Retrospective Studies , Tenosynovitis/drug therapy , Tenosynovitis/surgery , Therapeutic Irrigation/veterinary , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing
3.
Equine Vet J ; 24(6): 450-6, 1992 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1459058

ABSTRACT

Bacterial culture and susceptibility results were analysed from 233 horses with septic arthritis/tenosynovitis or osteomyelitis that developed after fracture repair. Antibiotics were deemed highly effective, effective or ineffective if > or = 85%, 70-84.9% or < 70% of the isolates were susceptible respectively. In total, 424 bacterial types were isolated; 386 were aerobic or facultative and 38 were anaerobic. Enterobacteriaceae (28.8%) were the most common bacterial group isolated, followed by non-beta-haemolytic streptococci (13.0%), coagulase-positive staphylococci (11.8%), beta-haemolytic streptococci (9.4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (7.3%). The remainder of the organisms were other Gram-negative (15.8%), other Gram-positive (2.3%) and miscellaneous (2.6%) bacteria. Penicillin and ampicillin were highly effective against beta-haemolytic streptococci, but were ineffective against other bacteria. Ampicillin was no more effective than penicillin against most bacteria. Amikacin was the most effective antibiotic against the wide range of bacteria isolated in this study. Amikacin was highly effective against coagulase-positive staphylococci, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas and was effective against coagulase-negative staphylococci and Actinobacillus. Gentamycin was not highly effective against any bacterial group; but was effective against coagulase-positive and negative staphylococci, Pseudomonas, Salmonella and Actinobacillus. Kanamycin was ineffective against all bacteria with the exception of Actinobacillus. Cephalothin was highly effective against beta-haemolytic streptococci, coagulase-positive staphylococci and Actinobacillus and was effective against coagulase-negative staphylococci.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Infectious/veterinary , Bacteria/drug effects , Horse Diseases/microbiology , Osteomyelitis/veterinary , Tenosynovitis/veterinary , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Arthritis, Infectious/microbiology , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Horses , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Tenosynovitis/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...