Justifying the prediction of major soil nutrients levels (N, P, and K) in cabbage cultivation.

In a recent paper by Sajindra et al. [1], the soil nutrient levels, specifically nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, in organic cabbage cultivation were predicted using a deep learning model. This model was designed with a total of four hidden layers, excluding the input and output layers, with each hidden layer meticulously crafted to contain ten nodes. The selection of the tangent sigmoid transfer function as the optimal activation function for the dataset was based on considerations such as the coefficient of correlation, mean squared error, and the accuracy of the predicted results. Throughout this study, the objective is to justify the tangent sigmoid transfer function and provide mathematical justification for the obtained results.•This paper presents the comprehensive methodology for the development of deep neural network for predict the soil nutrient levels.•Tangent Sigmoid transfer function usage is justified in predictions.•Methodology can be adapted to any similar real-world scenarios.

Modeling strength characteristics of basalt fiber reinforced concrete using multiple explainable machine learning with a graphical user interface.

This study investigated the importance of applying explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) on different machine learning (ML) models developed to predict the strength characteristics of basalt-fiber reinforced concrete (BFRC). Even though ML is widely adopted in strength prediction in concrete, the black-box nature of predictions hinders the interpretation of results. Among several attempts to overcome this limitation by using explainable AI, researchers have employed only a single explanation method. In this study, we used three tree-based ML models (Decision tree, Gradient Boosting tree, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine) to predict the mechanical strength characteristics (compressive strength, flexural strength, and tensile strength) of basal fiber reinforced concrete (BFRC). For the first time, we employed two explanation methods (Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME)) to provide explanations for all models. These explainable methods reveal the underlying decision-making criteria of complex machine learning models, improving the end user's trust. The comparison highlights that tree-based models obtained good accuracy in predicting strength characteristics yet, their explanations were different either by the magnitude of feature importance or the order of importance. This disagreement pushes towards complicated decision-making based on ML predictions which further stresses (1) extending XAI-based research in concrete strength predictions, and (2) involving domain experts to evaluate XAI results. The study concludes with the development of a "user-friendly computer application" which enables quick strength prediction of basalt fiber reinforced concrete (BFRC).

Predicting Bulk Average Velocity with Rigid Vegetation in Open Channels Using Tree-Based Machine Learning: A Novel Approach Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence.

Predicting the bulk-average velocity (UB) in open channels with rigid vegetation is complicated due to the non-linear nature of the parameters. Despite their higher accuracy, existing regression models fail to highlight the feature importance or causality of the respective predictions. Therefore, we propose a method to predict UB and the friction factor in the surface layer (fS) using tree-based machine learning (ML) models (decision tree, extra tree, and XGBoost). Further, Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) was used to interpret the ML predictions. The comparison emphasized that the XGBoost model is superior in predicting UB (R = 0.984) and fS (R = 0.92) relative to the existing regression models. SHAP revealed the underlying reasoning behind predictions, the dependence of predictions, and feature importance. Interestingly, SHAP adheres to what is generally observed in complex flow behavior, thus, improving trust in predictions.