Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 22(2): 231-237, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36967267

ABSTRACT

AIM: Patients with loco-regional right-sided colorectal tumors have a worse overall survival (OS). Here we investigate the difference in disease free survival (DFS) between colorectal patients with right and left sided tumors in the SCOT study. METHODS: The SCOT study showed 3-months of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (OxFp) is non-inferior to 6-months for patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colorectal cancer. We divided the cohort into patients with left and right sided tumors, and evaluated the effect on DFS and the principle 3 versus 6-months analysis. RESULTS: 6088 patients with Stage III/high risk Stage II colorectal cancers were randomized between 27th March 2008 and 29th November 2013 from 244 centers internationally. In February 2017 (3-years FU) information on sidedness was available for 3309 patients (1238 R-sided, 2071 L-sided). Patients with right-sided tumors had a significantly worse DFS (3-year DFS right: 73.3% (se = 1.3%), left: 80.2% (se = 0.9%) HR 1.423 (95% CI 1.237-1.637; P < .0001). Adjusting for T and N-stage reduced the HR to 1.230 (95% CI 1.066-1.420, P = .005). The data did not suggest that sidedness affected the impact of chemotherapy duration on 3-year DFS (R: HR 1.024 [0.831-1.261], L: HR 0.944 [0.783-1.139]). Test for heterogeneity, P = .571. Further sub-set analysis was limited due to cohort size. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that unselected patients with right-sided tumors had a worse DFS compared to left-sided tumors. Tumor sidedness did not impact upon the 3-months versus 6-months comparison in SCOT.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Disease-Free Survival , Prognosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Neoplasm Staging , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 12(22): 6737-47, 2006 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17121894

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To conduct a phase I clinical trial with a second-generation oncolytic herpes simplex virus (HSV) expressing granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Onco VEXGM-CSF) to determine the safety profile of the virus, look for evidence of biological activity, and identify a dosing schedule for later studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The virus was administered by intratumoral injection in patients with cutaneous or s.c. deposits of breast, head and neck and gastrointestinal cancers, and malignant melanoma who had failed prior therapy. Thirteen patients were in a single-dose group, where doses of 10(6), 10(7), and 10(8) plaque-forming units (pfu)/mL were tested, and 17 patients were in a multidose group testing a number of dose regimens. RESULTS: The virus was generally well tolerated with local inflammation, erythema, and febrile responses being the main side effects. The local reaction to injection was dose limiting in HSV-seronegative patients at 10(7) pfu/mL. The multidosing phase thus tested seroconverting HSV-seronegative patients with 10(6) pfu/mL followed by multiple higher doses (up to 10(8) pfu/mL), which was well tolerated by all patients. Biological activity (virus replication, local reactions, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor expression, and HSV antigen-associated tumor necrosis), was observed. The duration of local reactions and virus replication suggested that dosing every 2 to 3 weeks was appropriate. Nineteen of 26 patient posttreatment biopsies contained residual tumor of which 14 showed tumor necrosis, which in some cases was extensive, or apoptosis. In all cases, areas of necrosis also strongly stained for HSV. The overall responses to treatment were that three patients had stable disease, six patients had tumors flattened (injected and/or uninjected lesions), and four patients showed inflammation of uninjected as well as the injected tumor, which, in nearly all cases, became inflamed. CONCLUSIONS: Onco VEXGM-CSF is well tolerated and can be safely administered using the multidosing protocol described. Evidence of an antitumor effect was seen.


Subject(s)
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/therapy , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Simplexvirus , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Biopsy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Cytokines/blood , Female , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/adverse effects , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/metabolism , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/therapy , Middle Aged , Oncolytic Virotherapy/adverse effects , Oncolytic Viruses , Recombinant Proteins , Simplexvirus/immunology , Simplexvirus/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...