ABSTRACT
Audience and Type of Curriculum: This longitudinal leadership curriculum is designed for emergency medicine residents at all levels, with individual sessions designed for each residency year. Length of Curriculum: This curriculum runs once annually over three to four years of emergency medicine residency. Introduction: Leadership is a vital skill for emergency physicians but is often passively taught during residency training. Strong leadership skills can lead to improved patient outcomes, but very few residency programs in any specialty and no emergency medicine residency programs have published comprehensive leadership training curricula. Educational Goals: The goals of this curriculum are to expose Emergency Medicine residents to the basics of leadership, to provide a graduated series of interactive, psychologically safe environments to explore individual leadership styles, to review interesting relevant literature, and to discuss leadership principles and experiences with senior leaders in our Emergency Department. Educational Methods: The educational strategies used in this curriculum include: brief lecture-style seminars, small group discussion and reflection, and a panel-style discussion. Research Methods: The educational content of this curriculum was evaluated by learners via feedback surveys after each session. Results: Course evaluations conducted in both 2017 and 2020 showed that more than 89% of resident participants found these sessions "useful" or "very useful." All residents surveyed agreed that leadership is an important topic for emergency medicine residency, and 76% felt that the inclusion of leadership content strengthened the residency's curriculum. Suggestions for future topics included handling personal conflict and discussing transitions in leadership during yearly residency promotions. Discussion: The curriculum has been successfully implemented for seven years. It has proven to be sustainable and requires minimal resources. The residents report high satisfaction with the curriculum and agree that formal instruction on the topic of leadership is important to their on-shift performance and careers. Topics: Leadership, communication.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a dire need for more surgical services as part of improving global health. Conditions treatable with surgery account for 11% of the global burden of disease, with a disproportionate burden affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Less than 6% of the world's operations are performed in LMICs, with relief organizations performing nearly 250,000 operations annually in LMICs in addition to each country's domestic surgical capacity. Currently, surgical needs are not adequately met by the existing patchwork of federal and nongovernmental organizations' surgical services and surgical mission trips. Improving coordination between mission trips may have synergistic benefits for maximizing the efficacy of the individual trips and improving the overall quality of care. OBJECTIVES: To establish whether cooperation between surgical mission trips can lead to operational efficiency and to identify obstacles to cooperation. METHODS: In order to establish the veracity of cooperation translating into efficiency and to identify obstacles that prevent cooperation, a 50-question survey was created (see Supplement 1). The survey was sent to surgical program directors of the 147 major surgical programs in the United States and Canada with a follow-up telephone survey of 18 randomly selected programs. FINDINGS: The survey response rate was 14%. Although 90% of respondent programs mount at least 1 mission trip per year, only one-third confirmed the existence of global health or surgical global health programs at their institution (33%). There was significant interest in cooperating with programs at other institutions (80%). When asked why they do not communicate with humanitarian aid organizations doing similar work, 53% of respondents reported a "lack of knowledge of how to find similar organizations to mine doing similar work." An additional 21% of respondents were "unaware that coordination is possible." CONCLUSIONS: A minority of respondent surgery programs host formal, organized surgical global health programs with a structured leadership based at academic medical centers. Although most institutions have individuals leading international humanitarian missions to LMICs, these leaders do not function in an integrated fashion with their departments, institutions, or other academic medical programs. The majority of respondents were interested in coordinating their surgical trips with other groups. Respondents suggested the creation of a central database that would allow trip organizers to share information about upcoming trips, site logistics, and personnel or supply needs.