Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 47(5): 1072-1073, Sept.-Oct. 2021.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1286814

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction: One of the most remarkable characteristics of urothelial carcinomas is multifocality. However, occurrence of synchronous bladder cancer and upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is exceptional. Minimally invasive approach for these synchronous tumors was just occasionally reported (1-4). The aim of this video article is to describe step-by-step the technique for simultaneous laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and robot-assisted anterior pelvic exenteration with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion (ICUD). Patients and methods: A 66-year-old female presented with synchronous BCG refractory non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and a right-side UTUC. She was a former smoker and had previously been submitted to multiple transurethral resections of bladder tumor, BCG and right distal ureterectomy with ureteral reimplant. We performed a simultaneous laparoscopic right nephroureterectomy and robot-assisted anterior pelvic exenteration with totally intracorporeal ICUD. Combination of robot-assisted and pure laparoscopic approaches was proposed focusing on optimization of total operative time (TOT). Results: Surgery was uneventful. TOT was of 330 minutes. Operative time for nephroureterectomy, anterior pelvic exenteration and ICUD were 48, 135, 87 minutes, respectively. Estimated blood loss was 150mL. Postoperative course was unremarkable and patient was discharged after 7 days. Histopathological evaluation showed a pT1 high grade urothelial carcinoma plus carcinoma in situ both in proximal right ureter and bladder, with negative margins. Twelve lymph nodes were excised, all of them negative. Conclusion: In our preliminary experience, totally minimally invasive simultaneous nephroureterectomy and cystectomy with intracorporeal ICUD is feasible. Pure laparoscopic approach to upper urinary tract may be a useful tactic to reduce total operative time.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pelvic Exenteration , Urinary Diversion , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Robotics , Laparoscopy , Cystectomy , Nephroureterectomy
3.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 19(4): 339-345, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33839039

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic impact of immunohistochemical expression of SETD2 in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 662 patients with primary or metastatic ccRCC were evaluated. Two genitourinary pathologist reviewed all of the cases for uniform reclassification and determined the selection of the most representative tumor areas for construction of the tissue microarray (TMA). RESULTS: SETD2 nuclear staining showed that 101 areas (15.3%) had negative expression, and 561 areas (84,7%) had positive expression of SETD2. The protein expression of SETD2 was associated with clinical stage (P < .001), pathological stage (P < .001), tumor size (P < .001), perinephric fat invasion (P < .001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (P = .004), surgery type (P < .001), International Society of Urologic Pathologists grade (P < .001), and tumor necrosis (P < .001). SETD2 influenced disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). DSS rates in patients with positive and negative expression of SETD2 were 90.2% and 58.4%, respectively (P < .001). OS rates in patients with positive and negative expression of SETD2 were 87% and 55.4%, respectively (P < .001). In a multivariate Cox analysis, low SETD2 expression was an independent predictor of DSS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.690; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0582.700; P = .031) and OS (HR, 1.641; 95% CI, 1.039-2.593; P = .037). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the negative expression of SETD2 was associated with a worse prognosis, and it was an independent predictor of survival in patients with ccRCC. We believe that the protein expression of SETD2 is an important biomarker in the management of patients with ccRCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Biomarkers, Tumor , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase/genetics , Humans , Kidney , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis
4.
Urol Oncol ; 38(3): 75.e1-75.e7, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31648868

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To analyze the immunohistochemical expression of ezrin and moesin in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). These proteins, as part of the ezrin-radixin-moesin complex link the cell membrane to the actin cytoskeleton, affecting such processes as cell adhesion, cell survival, cell motility, and signal transduction. Our aim was to examine the impact of their expression on clinical outcomes and survival rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred seventy-five consecutive patients who had been treated surgically for ccRCC in a single center between 1985 and 2016 were selected. A single pathologist reviewed all cases to perform a uniform reclassification and determined the most representative tumor areas for construction of a tissue microarray. RESULTS: Of all ccRCC specimens, 106 (18.3%) were negative for ezrin, and 469 (81.7%) had positive ezrin expression; 16 (2.8%) were negative and 559 (97.2%) were positive for moesin, respectively. Ezrin expression was associated with pT stage (P < 0.001), clinical stage (P = 0.012), synchronic metastasis (P < 0.001), incidental tumors (P = 0.007), and International Society of Urological Pathology histological grade (P = 0.025). There was a correlation between moesin expression and clinical stage (P = 0.027), pT stage (P = 0.025), and pN stage (P = 0.007). Ezrin expression significantly influenced tumor-related deaths. By multivariate analysis, negative ezrin expression was an independent risk factor for disease-specific survival (HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.11-3.20). CONCLUSIONS: Negativity for ezrin in ccRCC patients significantly impacts survival rates. We encourage further prospective studies to analyze ezrin analysis to evaluate its significance in the prognosis of ccRCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Cytoskeletal Proteins/biosynthesis , Kidney Neoplasms/metabolism , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Microfilament Proteins/biosynthesis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/chemistry , Cytoskeletal Proteins/analysis , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Kidney Neoplasms/chemistry , Male , Microfilament Proteins/analysis , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Young Adult
5.
Int Braz J Urol ; 44(5): 1050, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617076

ABSTRACT

Kidney cancer is the third most common urologic malignancy and a 2% annual increase in the incidence has occurred over the past two decades, largely because of the increased utilization of imaging. The majority of these tumors are small, so the indications for nephron-sparing surgery and for minimally invasive surgery are continually expanding. Complex kidney lesions, such as those completely endophytic, are still a challenge even for experienced surgeons. Our objective is to demonstrate the operative technique for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with the aid of intra-operative ultrasound in a man with a totally endophytic renal lesion. Case: A 52 years old man, asymptomatic, with incidental renal mass of 2.9 cm, completely endophytic (R.E.N.A.L score 9p) submitted to partial laparoscopic nephrectomy. Surgical time was 2 hours, with 20 minutes of ischemia. Pathological anatomy confirmed tumor of clear cells T1a, free margins.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Humans , Incidental Findings , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...