Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0295373, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870202

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modify excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) and influence online motor learning. However, research on the effects of tDCS on motor learning has focused predominantly on simplified motor tasks. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether anodal stimulation of M1 over a single session of practice influences online learning of a relatively complex rhythmic timing video game. Fifty-eight healthy young adults were randomized to either a-tDCS or SHAM conditions and performed 2 familiarization blocks, a 20-minute 5 block practice period while receiving their assigned stimulation, and a post-test block with their non-dominant hand. To assess performance, a performance index was calculated that incorporated timing accuracy elements and incorrect key inputs. The results showed that M1 a-tDCS enhanced the learning of the video game based skill more than SHAM stimulation during practice, as well as overall learning at the post-test. These results provide evidence that M1 a-tDCS can enhance acquisition of skills where quality or success of performance depends on optimized timing between component motions of the skill, which could have implications for the application of tDCS in many real-world contexts.


Subject(s)
Learning , Motor Cortex , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Video Games , Humans , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Male , Female , Learning/physiology , Young Adult , Motor Cortex/physiology , Adult , Motor Skills/physiology
2.
Brain Res ; 1790: 147993, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35760153

ABSTRACT

Motor skill learning can cause structural and functional changes in the primary motor cortex (M1) leading to cortical plasticity that can be associated with the performance change during the motor skill that is practiced. Similarly, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) has been shown to facilitate and enhance plasticity in M1, causing even greater motor skill improvement. By using a fine motor task (O'Connor Tweezer Dexterity Task) in combination with a-tDCS we theorized that a-tDCS could increase the speed of skill acquisition. Forty subjects were recruited and randomized into either a-tDCS or SHAM groups. Subjects completed a single session performing the O'Connor Tweezer Dexterity Task with their non-dominant hand while receiving either a-tDCS stimulation or SHAM stimulation of the hand region of M1. The time it took to place 50- pins was assessed before and after 20 min of practice with a-tDCS or SHAM. We found that both groups had similar pre-test performance (P = 0.94) and they both had a similar amount of practice pins placed (P = 0.69). However, the a-tDCS group had a greater improvement than the SHAM group (p = 0.028) for overall learning from pretest to posttest. These results suggest that a-tDCS improved the rate of motor learning and fine motor task performance. These results are in line with previous research and demonstrate that a-tDCS applied to M1 can increase manual precision and steadiness needed for delicate tasks and could have implications in the advancement of surgical training as well as in athletic, military, and other occupational settings.


Subject(s)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Hand/physiology , Hand Strength/physiology , Humans , Motor Skills/physiology , Task Performance and Analysis , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods
3.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging ; 42(4): 233-240, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35319161

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limb circumference predicts the pressure needed for complete occlusion. However, that relationship is inconsistent at moderate pressures typical of effective blood flow restriction (BFR) training. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of subject factors on BFR at low restriction pressures in the arm. METHODS: Fifty subjects had arm anthropometrics assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), sum of skinfold thickness (sumSKF) and Gulick tape (Gulick tape circumference [Gulick Circ.]) at cuff level. Blood flow (BF) was measured with ultrasound at baseline and five restrictive pressures (20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 mmHg). Relationships between subject characteristics and BFR were assessed using Pearson's correlations and hierarchical regression. RESULTS: BF decreased (p < 0.05) at each incremental pressure. Regression models including percent muscle composition (%Muscle), pQCT circumference and systolic blood pressure (SBP), were significant at all five pressures (R2 = 0.18-0.49). %Muscle explained the most variance at each pressure. Regression models including sumSKF, Gulick Circ. and SBP, were significant at 30-60 mmHg (R2 = 0.28-0.49). SumSKF explained the most variance at each pressure. CONCLUSIONS: At low pressures (20-60 mmHg), there is considerable variability in the magnitude of BFR across individuals. Arm composition factors (muscle and fat) explained the greatest variance at each cuff pressure and may be the most important consideration when using BFR protocols.


Subject(s)
Arm , Resistance Training , Arm/physiology , Blood Pressure/physiology , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Hemodynamics , Humans , Muscle, Skeletal/blood supply , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Resistance Training/methods
4.
Neurosci Lett ; 764: 136211, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34481881

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to enhance or block online learning of motor skills, depending on the current direction. However, most research on the use of tDCS has been limited to the study of relatively simple motor tasks. The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of anodal (a-tDCS) and cathodal (c-tDCS) direct current stimulation on the online learning during a single session of dart throwing. Fifty-eight young adults were randomized to a-tDCS, c-tDCS, or SHAM groups and completed a pre-test block of dart throws, a 20-minute practice block of throws while receiving their stimulation condition, and a post-test block of dart throws. The results showed that a-tDCS accelerated the skill learning of dart throwing more than SHAM and c-tDCS conditions. The SHAM and c-tDCS conditions were not different. We conclude that a-tDCS may have a positive effect in a single training session which would be ideal in a recreational game environment where repeated practice is not common.


Subject(s)
Education, Distance , Learning/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Motor Skills/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Electrodes , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Recreation , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Young Adult
5.
Brain Sci ; 11(3)2021 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33806742

ABSTRACT

Cortical representations expand during skilled motor learning. We studied a unique model of motor learning with cellular phone texting, where the thumbs are used exclusively to interact with the device and the prominence of use can be seen where 3200 text messages are exchanged a month in the 18-24 age demographic. The purpose of the present study was to examine the motor cortex representation and input-output (IO) recruitment curves of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the thumb and the ADM muscle with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), relative to individuals' texting abilities and short-term texting practice. Eighteen individuals performed a functional texting task (FTT) where we scored their texting speed and accuracy. TMS was then used to examine the cortical volumes and areas of activity in the two muscles and IO curves were constructed to measure excitability. Subjects also performed a 10-min practice texting task, after which we repeated the cortical measures. There were no associations between the cortical measures and the FTT scores before practice. However, after practice the APB cortical map expanded and excitability increased, whereas the ADM map constricted. The increase in the active cortical areas in APB correlated with the improvement in the FTT score. Based on the homogenous group of subjects that were already good at texting, we conclude that the cortical representations and excitability for the thumb muscle were already enlarged and more receptive to changes with short-term practice, as noted by the increase in FTT performance after 10-min of practice.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...