Quality assurance of SARS-CoV-2 testing laboratories during the pandemic period in India - An experience from a designated provider laboratory.

PURPOSE: Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) initiated an Inter-Laboratory Quality Control testing (ILQC) program for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing. Under this program, SARS-CoV-2 testing laboratories across the country submit specimens to the assigned State Quality Control (SQCs) laboratories for ILQC testing. This study aimed to investigate the performance of public and private SARS-CoV-2 testing laboratories in Delhi and highlights the country's effort in ramping up testing facility with close monitoring of the quality of Covid-19 testing results. METHODS: In the present study, two-years of SARS-CoV-2 testing data is included. During July 2020 through February 2022, a total of 1791 anonymised specimens were received from 56 public and private laboratories. These specimens were processed by reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests as per National Institute of Virology (NIV) protocol and the results were uploaded on the ICMR quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) portal without directly conveying the results to respective participating laboratories. This portal generated a final report stating concordance and intimate results to individual laboratories. RESULTS: Among the 1791 specimens, 25 were rejected and the remaining 1766 were tested. Among these specimens 1691 (95.75%) revealed concordance, and 75 (4.24%) were discordant. A total of 29 laboratories had 100% concordance, 21 laboratories had over 90% concordance and six laboratories had over 80% concordance. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that the establishment of an inter-laboratory comparison program for SARS-CoV-2 testing helped in monitoring quality of SARS-CoV-2 testing in the country.

Effect of 3% Hypertonic Saline Resuscitation on Lactate Clearance and Its Comparison With 0.9% Normal Saline in Traumatic Injury Patients: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

BACKGROUND:  Fluid resuscitation with normal saline (NS) can aggravate lactate production. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of small-volume resuscitation using 3% hypertonic sodium chloride (HS) and its comparison with NS in trauma patients. The primary endpoint was an increase in lactate clearance after 1 hr of fluid resuscitation. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of hemodynamic stability, the volume of transfusion, correction of metabolic acidosis, and complications such as fluid overload and abnormal serum sodium levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. The study was conducted on 60 patients who arrived at the trauma center for emergency operative intervention. Inclusion criteria for patient selection were trauma victims of age more than 18 years and the requirement of emergency operative intervention for trauma except for traumatic brain injury. Patients were divided into two groups: Group HS (hypertonic saline) and Group NS (normal saline). Patients were resuscitated with either 3% HS (4ml/kg) or 0.9% NS (20ml/kg). RESULTS: The HS group had higher lactate clearance at 1 hour compared to the NS group, and this difference was statistically significant with a p-value of <0.001. When hemodynamic parameters were compared at 30 and 60 minutes after resuscitation, the HS group had a significantly lower heart rate (p<0.05 at 30 minutes and <0.001 at 60 minutes, respectively), a higher mean arterial pressure at 60 minutes (p<0.001), a higher pH at 60 minutes (p< 0.05), and a higher bicarbonate concentration at 60 minutes (p<0.05). The HS and NS groups had significant differences in serum sodium levels at 60 minutes (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Resuscitation with 3% hypertonic saline improved lactate clearance. Lower volumes of fluid infusion for resuscitation achieved better hemodynamic stability and correction of metabolic acidosis in the hypertonic saline group. Our study shows that hypertonic saline can be a promising fluid for small-volume resuscitation in trauma patients with compensated mild to moderate shock.

An innovative technique for nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation using SNPA and its comparison with conventional technique: RCT.

Background: Awake nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation by conventional technique is time consuming and requires expertise. Complications encountered in the conventional technique sometime leads to procedure failure. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to compare the innovative technique using split nasopharyngeal airway (SNPA) with the conventional technique for nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation in terms of time taken for intubation. Method: This was a prospective, randomized, and single blind study conducted with 80 patients who were scheduled for maxillofacial surgery. Patients were randomized into two groups, group CFBI (conventional fiberoptic intubation) and group SNPA (split nasopharyngeal airway). In both the groups patients were prepared for awake fiberoptic naso-tracheal intubation. In Group CFBI (N = 41) awake naso-tracheal intubation was achieved by conventional technique of bronchoscope first approach. In Group SNPA (N = 39) spirally split nasopharyngeal airway was used first as a conduit for the passage of fiberoptic bronchoscope. The primary objective was to assess the time taken for intubation. The secondary objectives were to assess the rate of complications in the form of bleeding, cough, desaturation during the procedure, laryngospasm, and nasal bleeding. Result: The time taken for intubation was 6.15 ± 3.0 minutes in CFBI group and 3.10 ± 1.35 minutes in SNPA group and this this difference was statically significant with P value <0.001. Desaturation during the procedure was more in CFBI (99.46 ± 0.75) compared to SNPA (99 ± 0) group with significant difference P value <0.001. Conclusion: Split nasopharyngeal airway was used as conduit for the passage for the flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope and it considerably reduced the time required for fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation compared to the conventional technique of endotracheal tube first approach. Split nasopharyngeal airway provided better intubating conditions with lesser complications and superior patient comfort.

Public reactions towards Covid-19 vaccination through twitter before and after second wave in India.

Social media have a significant impact on opinion building in public. Vaccination in India started in January 2021. We have seen many opinions towards vaccination of the people, as vaccination is one of the most crucial steps toward the fight against COVID-19. In this paper, we have compared the public's sentiments towards COVID vaccination in India before the second wave and after the second wave. We worked by extracting tweets regarding vaccination in India, building our datasets. We extracted 5977 tweets before the second wave and 42,936 tweets after the second wave. We annotated the collected tweets into four categories, namely Provaccine, Antivaccine, Hesitant and Cognizant. We built a baseline model for sentiment analysis and have used multiple classification techniques among which Random Forest using the TF-IDF vectorization technique gave the best accuracy of 69% using max-features and n-estimators as parameters.

Clinical characteristic and epidemiological features of SARS CoV -2 disease patients from a COVID 19 designated Hospital in New Delhi.

SARS CoV -2 infection is rapidly evolving as a serious global pandemic. The present study describes the clinical characteristics of SARS CoV-2 infection patients. The Samples were subjected to RT - PCR or Rapid Antigen test for diagnosis of SARS CoV- 2. A cohort of 3745 patients with confirmed diagnosis of SARS CoV -2 infection in a tertiary care center in New Delhi, India were included in this study. Data was collected from offline and online medical records over a period of six months. Amongst 3745 SARS CoV -2 infected patients, 2245 (60%) were symptomatic and 1500 (40%) were asymptomatic. Most common presenting symptom was cough (49.3%) followed febrile episodes (47.1%), breathlessness (42.7%) and sore throat (35.1%). Cough along with breathlessness (24.1) was the most common combination of symptoms followed by fever with cough (22.7). The most common comorbidity found among symptomatic group was diabetes (42.5%) followed by hypertension (21.4%) and chronic kidney disease (18%). Comorbidities like diabetes mellitus, chronic diseases of lungs, heart and kidneys were found to be common in symptomatic group and this was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). COVID-19 is an evolving disease and data from our study help in understanding the clinic-epidemiological profile of patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Comparative Study Between Ultrasound-guided Lumbar Paravertebral Block and Lumbar Epidural Block with Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Patient Undergoing Total Hip Replacement Surgery: A Prospective Randomised, Double-blind Study.

Background: Total hip replacement (THR) is mostly performed in patients above 65 years of age. Patients of this age group typically have comorbidities, therefore safe techniques for anaesthesia and analgesia with minimal side effects should be chosen and should allow early mobilisation. Lumbar paravertebral block is less explored in this domain. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided lumbar paravertebral and epidural block using ropivacaine (0.25%) with fentanyl as adjuvant for postoperative pain in patients undergoing unilateral THR. Settings and Design: Randomised, controlled, double-blind, prospective study carried out in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Banaras Hindu University. Methods and Material: After receiving institutional ethical committee clearance and written informed consent from patients, this study was carried out from February 2019 to February 2020. Sixty adult patients who required THR and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomised into two groups. The thirty patients in Group A received a continuous infusion of 5 ml/hr (0.25%) ropivacaine + 2 mcg/ml fentanyl via lumbar epidural catheter. The thirty patients in Group B received a continuous infusion of 5 ml/hr (0.25%) ropivacaine + 2 mcg/ml fentanyl via lumbar paravertebral catheter. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain scores. Rescue analgesia use and duration of hospital stay was calculated and compared in postoperative period. The statistical analysis of data was done by using software Statistical Package for Social Sciences SPSS for Windows (Version 23.0), and chi-square test was used for categorical variables. To compare the two groups of mean Student's t-test and for more than two groups one-way analysis of variance, the ANOVA test was used. Results: In Group A, 16.7% patients required rescue analgesic, and in Group B, 26.7% required rescue analgesia which is comparable and non-significant. The mean duration of hospital stay in Group A is 7.50 days. Compared to 6.47 days in Group B, this difference is statistically significant (p-0.000). Conclusions: Analgesia provided by paravertebral block is not superior to epidural block, but paravertebral block did reduce the duration of hospital stay and provided better haemodynamic stability.