Target attainment and population pharmacokinetics of flucloxacillin in critically ill patients: a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Insufficient antimicrobial exposure has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. Reportedly, flucloxacillin target attainment in critically ill patients was heterogeneous considering the study population selection and reported target attainment percentages. Therefore, we assessed flucloxacillin population pharmacokinetics (PK) and target attainment in critically ill patients. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted from May 2017 to October 2019 and included adult, critically ill patients administered flucloxacillin intravenously. Patients with renal replacement therapy or liver cirrhosis were excluded. We developed and qualified an integrated PK model for total and unbound serum flucloxacillin concentrations. Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed to assess target attainment. The unbound target serum concentration was four times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for ≥ 50% of the dosing interval (ƒT>4xMIC ≥ 50%). RESULTS: We analyzed 163 blood samples from 31 patients. A one-compartment model with linear plasma protein binding was selected as most appropriate. Dosing simulations revealed 26% ƒT>2 mg/L ≥ 50% following continuous infusion of 12 g flucloxacillin and 51% ƒT>2 mg/L ≥ 50% for 24 g. CONCLUSION: Based on our dosing simulations, standard flucloxacillin daily doses of up to 12 g may substantially enhance the risk of underdosing in critically ill patients. Prospective validation of these model predictions is needed.

Extremely high unbound flucloxacillin concentrations in a patient with acute septic renal failure during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: Therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize treatment.

A 75-year-old female orthopedic patient with spondylodiscitis was admitted to the intensive care unit, where she developed severe acute renal injury (AKI) due to a Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) was initiated as renal replacement therapy. According to physician experience and based on (inter)national guidelines and the severity of the infection, treatment with intravenous (IV) flucloxacillin at an initial continuous dose of 9 g/24h was started. The dose was increased to 12 g/24h because endocarditis could not be excluded. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was used to monitor flucloxacillin levels which are related to antibiotic efficacy and toxicity. Total and unbound flucloxacillin concentrations were measured following 24 hours of continuous infusion at three time points before regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA)-CVVH was initiated, at three time points in plasma, pre-filter, and post-filter, and in ultrafiltrate samples during RCA-CVVH treatment and 1 day following cessation of CVVH treatment. Extremely high total (up to 299.8 mg/L) and unbound (up to 155.1 mg/L) flucloxacillin concentrations were found in the plasma. This led to a dose decrease to 6 g/24h and subsequently to 3 g/24h. Antimicrobial target attainment against S. aureus was achieved by dosing IV flucloxacillin based on TDM. Based on these findings, we conclude that current dosing guidelines for flucloxacillin during renal replacement therapy need revision. We suggest a starting dose of 4 g/24h, which should be adjusted based on the TDM of the unbound flucloxacillin concentration.

Population pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftriaxone in a critically ill population.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable 2-compartment population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for unbound ceftriaxone in a critically ill population and determine an optimal dosing regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, observational study of critically ill patients treated with ceftriaxone. Unbound serum ceftriaxone concentrations were measured using validated ultrafiltration and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK analysis and dosing simulations were performed using an iterative 2-stage Bayesian fitting procedure and Monte Carlo simulations. The PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) target was attained when unbound serum ceftriaxone concentrations exceeded 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for ≥ 60% of the dosing interval (ƒT>4xMIC ≥ 60%). RESULTS: 91 patients were enrolled, and 173 unbound ceftriaxone concentrations were acquired. The population PK parameter estimates were hepatic clearance 5.2 ± 0.9 L/h/1.85m2, the unbound renal clearance of ceftriaxone divided by the creatinine clearance 0.61 ± 0.24, lean body mass corrected volume of distribution of the central compartment 0.82 ± 0.21 L/kg, and intercompartmental distribution rate constant from central to peripheral compartment 0.18 ± 0.08 h-1. Dosing simulations predicted ƒT>4 mg/L of 88% (95% CI: 69 - 100%) for 2,000 mg ceftriaxone once daily and ƒT>4 mg/L of 100% (95% CI: 100 - 100%) both for 1,000 mg twice daily and continuous infusion of 2,000 mg daily. CONCLUSION: We developed a reliable population PK model for unbound ceftriaxone in a critically ill population. Dosing simulations revealed ƒT>4 mg/L ≥ 60% for 1,000 mg twice daily and 2,000 mg once daily or by continuous infusion.

Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry to Monitor Unbound and Total Ceftriaxone in Serum of Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone is recommended for empiric antimicrobial therapy in patients with sepsis. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) guided dose optimisation could elucidate pharmacokinetic variabilities, improving treatment efficacy. However, detailed data on Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) for unbound ceftriaxone quantification in serum are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to develop a reliable UPLC-MS/MS method for serum ceftriaxone quantification and exhibit its application potential in routine hospital settings. METHODS: In this observational, single centre study, UPLC-MS/MS method validation included specificity, carry-over, linearity, repeatability, intermediate precision, accuracy, the limit of quantification, and plasma protein binding. Unbound and total ceftriaxone were quantified in the serum of 5 critically ill patients. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment calculations were performed for both unbound and total ceftriaxone. The PK/PD target for unbound ceftriaxone in serum was set at 4 times the non-species related minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint of 1 mg/L for at least 60% of the dosing interval. RESULTS: The UPLC-MS/MS method revealed acceptable limits for clinical samples, with coefficients of variation < 15.0% for concentrations between 0.2 - 400.0 mg/L. Ceftriaxone eluted at 1.94 min and ceftazidime, as internal standard, eluted at 1.42 min. Patients demonstrated a median unbound ceftriaxone fraction of 29.1% (IQR: 15.2 - 52.2). Day 1 of ceftriaxone treatment presented a median PK/PD target attainment of 100.0% (IQR: 81.1 - 100.0) for unbound ceftriaxone in serum, while for calculations based on total concentrations, this figure was 23.9% (IQR: 10.5 - 80.6). CONCLUSION: The described UPLC-MS/MS method enables reliable and rapid ceftriaxone quantification in the serum of critically ill patients. Method feasibility was exhibited for TDM purposes in routine clinical practice.

No effect of norepinephrine dose on anti-Xa activity in critically ill patients
.

OBJECTIVE: Low-molecular-weight heparins are frequently used to prevent venous thromboembolism. Vasopressor therapy may be associated with inadequate anti-factor Xa activity, thereby increasing the risk of venous thromboembolism. We aimed to assess the association between anti-factor Xa activity and norepinephrine dose in intensive care unit (ICU) patients treated with subcutaneous dalteparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational pilot study in adult ICU patients treated with dalteparin 5,000 IU subcutaneously once daily and norepinephrine > 0.25 µg/kg/min. Peak anti-factor Xa activity was monitored and dalteparin doses were adjusted following a predefined dose algorithm. RESULTS: From November 2016 to April 2018, 32 patients were included. No correlation was found between norepinephrine dose and anti-factor Xa activity (r = -0.01, 95% confidence interval = -0.47 - 0.27, p = 0.57). Furthermore, following dalteparin 5,000 IU once daily, 28% of the patients showed anti-factor Xa activity < 0.10 IU/mL. Higher body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001) but not patients' norepinephrine dose, age, or serum creatinine were risk factors for anti-factor Xa activity < 0.10 IU/mL. Dose increments to 7,500 IU once daily resulted in anti-factor Xa activity ≥ 0.10 IU/mL in all 5 patients (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of ICU patients, no association was found between norepinephrine dose and anti-factor Xa activity following subcutaneous dalteparin 5,000-IU administration once daily. Furthermore, nearly one-third of the patients showed anti-factor Xa activity below the target concentration for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Higher BMI was an independent risk factor for reduced anti-Xa activity.

Quantification of total and unbound cefuroxime in plasma by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in a cohort of critically ill patients with hypoalbuminemia and renal failure.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic studies of cefuroxime by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) have been limited to measurements of total concentrations. Here, we developed a robust method for quantifying total and unbound cefuroxime concentrations using UPLC-MS/MS and ultrafiltration in critically ill patients with hypoalbuminemia and renal failure. METHODS: Method validation included accuracy, linearity, precision, repeatability, recovery, and limit of quantification (LOQ). Feasibility of the method was performed on samples obtained from randomly selected intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Total and unbound cefuroxime concentrations were quantified using UPLC-MS/MS. Sampling times were categorized as trough (180-1 min prior to administration), peak (10-30 min after administration), mid (30-360 min after administration), and continuous (sampling during administration). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets were unbound cefuroxime concentrations above 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (32 mg/L). RESULTS: Intra-assay and inter-assay precision was <3%. Recovery was 99.7%-100.3%, and LOQ was 0.1 mg/L. We included 11 patients (median age 72 years (range 54-77). Median albumin serum concentrations and eGFR were 19 g/L (range 11-40 g/L) and 48 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range 7-115 mL/min/1.73 m2 ), respectively. Median trough and mid concentrations of total cefuroxime were 22.27 mg/L (range 5.42-54.03 mg/L) and 71.49 mg/L (range 53.87-73.86 mg/L), and median unbound fraction was 75.42% (range 27.36%-99.75%). Median unbound cefuroxime concentrations were 11.94 mg/L (range 3.85-32.39 mg/L) (trough) and 55.62 mg/L (range 10.03-62.62 mg/L) (mid). CONCLUSION: The method is precise and accurate according to ISO 15189 and within the clinical range of cefuroxime (0.5-100 mg/L). The method was applied in ICU patients and is suitable for TDM on unbound cefuroxime concentrations.