Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 60
Filter
1.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 33(3): 519-531, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37245933

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the types of pancreatic cysts encountered in Radiologic practice. It summarizes the malignancy risk of each of the following: serous cystadenoma, mucinous cystic tumor, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm main duct and side branch, and some miscellaneous cysts such as neuroendocrine tumor and solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm. Specific reporting recommendations are given. The choice between radiology follow-up versus endoscopic analysis is discussed.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous , Pancreatic Cyst , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Radiology , Humans , Pancreatic Cyst/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiography
2.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 33(3): 533-546, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37245934

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic cystic lesions are frequently identified on cross-sectional imaging. As many of these are presumed branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, these lesions generate much anxiety for the patients and clinicians, often necessitating long-term follow-up imaging and even unnecessary surgical resections. However, the incidence of pancreatic cancer is overall low for patients with incidental pancreatic cystic lesions. Radiomics and deep learning are advanced tools of imaging analysis that have attracted much attention in addressing this unmet need, however, current publications on this topic show limited success and large-scale research is needed.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Cyst , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreas/pathology , Pancreatic Cyst/diagnostic imaging
3.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 48(9): 2978-2985, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36871233

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Given that ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery is a technically challenging and high-morbidity procedure, there are numerous pertinent imaging findings that need to be clearly and efficiently communicated to the IBD surgeons for essential patient management and surgical planning. Structured reporting has been increasingly used over the past decade throughout various radiology subspecialties to improve reporting clarity and completeness. We compare structured versus non-structured reporting of pelvic MRI for ileal pouch to evaluate for clarity and effectiveness. METHODS: 164 consecutive pelvic MRI's for ileal pouch evaluation, excluding subsequent exams for the same patient, acquired between 1/1/2019 and 7/31/2021 at one institution were included, before and after implementation (11/15/2020) of a structured reporting template, which was created with institutional IBD surgeons. Reports were assessed for the presence of 18 key features required for complete ileal pouch assessment: anastomosis (IPAA, tip of J, pouch body), cuff (length, cuffitis), pouch body (size, pouchitis, stricture), pouch inlet/pre-pouch ileum (stricture, inflammation, sharp angulation), pouch outlet (stricture), peripouch mesentery (position, mesentery twist), pelvic abscess, peri-anal fistula, pelvic lymph nodes, and skeletal abnormalities. Subgroup analysis was performed based on reader experience and divided into three categories: experienced (n = 2), other intra-institutional (n = 20), or affiliate site (n = 6). RESULTS: 57 (35%) structured and 107 (65%) non-structured pelvic MRI reports were reviewed. Structured reports contained 16.6 [SD:4.0] key features whereas non-structured reports contained 6.3 [SD:2.5] key features (p < .001). The largest improvement following template implementation was for reporting sharp angulation of the pouch inlet (91.2% vs. 0.9%, p < .001), tip of J suture line and pouch body anastomosis (both improved to 91.2% from 3.7%). Structured versus non-structured reports contained mean 17.7 versus 9.1 key features for experienced readers, 17.0 versus 5.9 for other intra-institutional readers, and 8.7 versus 5.3 for affiliate site readers. CONCLUSION: Structured reporting of pelvic MRI guides a systematic search pattern and comprehensive evaluation of ileal pouches, and therefore facilitates surgical planning and clinical management. This standardized reporting template can serve as baseline at other institutions for adaptation based on specific radiology and surgery preferences, fostering a collaborative environment between radiology and surgery, and ultimately improving patient care.


Subject(s)
Colonic Pouches , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Proctocolectomy, Restorative , Humans , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Proctocolectomy, Restorative/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Postoperative Complications
4.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 219(6): 903-914, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35856454

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies, with a dismal survival rate. Screening the general population for early detection of PDAC is not recommended, but because early detection improves survival, high-risk individuals, defined as those meeting criteria based on a family history of PDAC and/or the presence of known pathogenic germline variant genes with PDAC risk, are recommended to undergo screening with MRI and/or endoscopic ultrasound at regular intervals. The Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection (PRECEDE) Consortium was formed in 2018 and is composed of gastroenterologists, geneticists, pancreatic surgeons, radiologists, statisticians, and researchers from 40 sites in North America, Europe, and Asia. The overarching goal of the PRECEDE Consortium is to facilitate earlier diagnosis of PDAC for high-risk individuals to increase survival of the disease. A standardized MRI protocol and reporting template are needed to enhance the quality of screening examinations, improve consistency of clinical management, and facilitate multiinstitutional research. We present a consensus statement to standardize MRI screening and reporting for individuals with elevated risk of pancreatic cancer.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Early Detection of Cancer , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Reference Standards , Pancreatic Neoplasms
5.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 217(2): 347-358, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32936014

ABSTRACT

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery is the reference standard surgical procedure for treatment of ulcerative colitis and most patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. This procedure allows preservation of fecal continence and gastrointestinal continuity. However, it is associated with a wide variety of complications, which often have nonspecific and overlapping clinical presentations, making imaging an important part of workup for pouch dysfunction. The purpose of this article is to propose structured reporting templates for MRI and water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE), based on our referral pouch center's experience, in patients who have undergone IPAA surgery. We review salient surgical technique, pouch anatomy, and imaging protocols, with an emphasis on a systematic search pattern for evaluation of ileal pouch complications using proposed structured reporting templates for MRI and WSCE.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Enema/methods , Image Enhancement/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Proctocolectomy, Restorative , Colon/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Rectum/diagnostic imaging , Referral and Consultation
7.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 45(4): 1198-1201, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31583445

ABSTRACT

Dual-energy CT (DECT) has been available for clinical use in the United States for close to 15 years. Although multiple applications in all areas of the body have been described that are only possible with DECT, the adoption into clinical practice has been slow. This paper will attempt to address many of the impediments the author has encountered from his discussions with radiologists across the country. A hopeful outcome would result in more practices adopting more DECT into their CT practices.


Subject(s)
Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Abdominal , Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Clinical Competence , Contrast Media , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
8.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 212(3): 596-601, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30620679

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to test for the possibility that published malignancy risks for side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are overestimates, likely due to verification bias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We tested for possible verification bias using simulation modeling techniques. First, in age-defined hypothetical cohorts of 10 million persons, we projected the frequency of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) arising from side-branch IPMNs over 5 years using published estimates of their prevalence (4.4%) and rate of malignant transformation (1.9%). Second, we projected the total number of PDAC cases in corresponding cohorts over the same time horizon using national cancer registry data. For each cohort, we determined whether the percentage of all PDAC cases that arose from side-branch IPMNs (i.e., side-branch IPMN-associated PDAC cases) was clinically plausible using an upper limit of 10% to define plausibility, as estimated from the literature. Model assumptions and parameter uncertainty were evaluated in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Across all cohorts, percentages of side-branch IPMN-associated PDACs greatly exceeded 10%. In the base case (mean age = 55.7 years), 80% of PDAC cases arose from side-branch IPMNs (7877/9786). In the oldest cohort evaluated (mean age = 75 years), this estimate was 76% (14,227/18,714). In a secondary analysis, we found that if an upper limit threshold of 10% for side-branch IPMN-associated PDAC was imposed, the model-predicted rate of malignancy for side-branch IPMNs would be less than 0.24% over a 5-year time horizon, substantially lower than most literature-based estimates. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that reported malignancy risks associated with side-branch IPMNs are likely to be overestimates and imply the presence of verification bias.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma, Papillary/epidemiology , Bias , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/epidemiology , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prevalence
11.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 16(5): 700-708, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30551999

ABSTRACT

The lack of prospective outcomes studies for many types of incidental findings limits our understanding of both their natural history and the potential efficacy of treatment. To support decision making for the management of incidental findings, major sources of uncertainty in management pathways can be mapped and analyzed using mathematical models. This process yields important insights into how uncertainty influences the best treatment decision. Here, we consider a classification scheme, grounded in decision science, which exposes various levels and types of uncertainty in the management of incidental findings and addresses (1) disease-related risks, which are considered in context of a patient's competing causes of mortality; (2) potential degrees of intervention; (3) strength of evidence; and (4) patients' treatment-related preferences. Herein we describe how categorizing uncertainty by the sources, issues, and locus can build a framework from which to improve the management of incidental findings. Accurate and comprehensive handling of uncertainty will improve the quality of related decision making and will help guide future research priorities.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Diagnostic Imaging , Incidental Findings , Uncertainty , Humans
12.
Radiol Clin North Am ; 56(4): 507-520, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29936944

ABSTRACT

Dual energy computed tomography has been available for more than 10 years; however, it is currently on the cusp of widespread clinical use. The way dual energy data are acquired and assembled must be appreciated at the clinical level so that the various reconstruction types can extend its diagnostic power. The type of scanner that is present in a given practice dictates the way in which the dual energy data can be presented and used. This article compares and contrasts how dual source, rapid kV switching, and spectral technologies acquire and present dual energy reconstructions to practicing radiologists.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , Workflow
14.
Radiology ; 287(2): 504-514, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29401040

ABSTRACT

Purpose To determine the effects of patient age and comorbidity level on life expectancy (LE) benefits associated with imaging follow-up of Bosniak IIF renal cysts and pancreatic side-branch (SB) intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). Materials and Methods A decision-analytic Markov model to evaluate LE benefits was developed. Hypothetical cohorts with varied age (60-80 years) and comorbidities (none, mild, moderate, or severe) were evaluated. For each finding, LE projections from two strategies were compared: imaging follow-up and no imaging follow-up. Under follow-up, it was assumed that cancers associated with the incidental finding were successfully treated before they spread. For patients without follow-up, mortality risks from Bosniak IIF cysts (renal cell carcinoma) and SBIPMNs (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma) were incorporated. Model assumptions and parameter uncertainty were evaluated in sensitivity analysis. Results In the youngest, healthiest cohorts (age, 60 years; no comorbidities), projected LE benefits from follow-up were as follows: Bosniak IIF cyst, 6.5 months (women) and 5.8 months (men); SBIPMN, 6.4 months (women) and 5.3 months (men). Follow-up of Bosniak IIF cysts in 60-year-old women with severe comorbidities yielded a LE benefit of 3.9 months; in 80-year-old women with no comorbidities, the benefit was 2.8 months, and with severe comorbidities the benefit was 1.5 months. Similar trends were observed in men and for SBIPMN. Results were sensitive to the performance of follow-up for cancer detection; malignancy risks; and stage at presentation of malignant, unfollowed Bosniak IIF cysts. Conclusion With progression of age and comorbidity level, follow-up of low-risk incidental findings yields increasingly limited benefits for patients. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , Incidental Findings , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Age Factors , Aged , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Comorbidity , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/mortality , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Life Expectancy , Male , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Sensitivity and Specificity
15.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 210(2): 369-375, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29140116

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess differences in patient distress, risk perception, and treatment preferences for incidental renal findings with descriptive versus combined descriptive and numeric graphical risk information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized survey study was conducted for adult patients about to undergo outpatient imaging studies at a large urban academic institution. Two survey arms contained either descriptive or a combination of descriptive and numeric graphical risk information about three hypothetical incidental renal findings at CT: 2-cm (low risk) and 5-cm (high risk) renal tumors and a 2-cm (low risk) renal artery aneurysm. The main outcomes were patient distress, perceived risk (qualitative and quantitative), treatment preference, and valuation of lesion discovery. RESULTS: Of 374 patients, 299 participated (79.9% response rate). With inclusion of numeric and graphical, rather than only descriptive, risk information about disease progression for a 2-cm renal tumor, patients reported less worry (3.56 vs 4.12 on a 5-point scale; p < 0.001) and favored surgical consultation less often (29.3% vs 46.9%; p = 0.003). The proportion choosing surgical consultation for the 2-cm renal tumor decreased to a similar level as for the renal artery aneurysm with numeric risk information (29.3% [95% CI, 21.7-36.8%] and 27.9% [95% CI, 20.5-35.3%], respectively). Patients overestimated the absolute risk of adverse events regardless of risk information type, but significantly more so when given descriptive information only, and valued the discovery of lesions regardless of risk information type (range, 4.41-4.81 on a 5-point scale). CONCLUSION: Numeric graphical risk communication for patients about incidental renal lesions may facilitate accurate risk comprehension and support patients in informed decision making.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging , Kidney Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Diseases/therapy , Patient Participation , Risk Assessment , Adolescent , Adult , Decision Making , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Incidental Findings , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 14(7): 911-923, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28533111

ABSTRACT

The ACR Incidental Findings Committee (IFC) presents recommendations for managing pancreatic cysts that are incidentally detected on CT or MRI. These recommendations represent an update from the pancreatic component of the JACR 2010 white paper on managing incidental findings in the adrenal glands, kidneys, liver, and pancreas. The Pancreas Subcommittee-which included abdominal radiologists, a gastroenterologist, and a pancreatic surgeon-developed this algorithm. The recommendations draw from published evidence and expert opinion, and were finalized by informal iterative consensus. Algorithm branches successively categorize pancreatic cysts based on patient characteristics and imaging features. They terminate with an ascertainment of benignity and/or indolence (sufficient to discontinue follow-up), or a management recommendation. The algorithm addresses most, but not all, pathologies and clinical scenarios. Our goal is to improve quality of care by providing guidance on how to manage incidentally detected pancreatic cysts.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Incidental Findings , Pancreatic Cyst/diagnostic imaging , Advisory Committees , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pancreatic Cyst/therapy , Radiology , Societies, Medical , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
18.
Radiology ; 282(2): 616, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28099104
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...