Fast Acting, Dry Powder, Needle-Free, Intranasal Epinephrine Spray: A Promising Future Treatment for Anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine intramuscular (IM) autoinjector is a life-saving drug for the emergency treatment of immediate-type allergic reactions (type I). Nevertheless, it is sometimes applied incorrectly or underused because of short shelf life, high costs, fear of use, or inconvenience of carrying. FMXIN002, a nasal powder spray of epinephrine, was developed as a needle-free alternative. OBJECTIVE: To compare epinephrine pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety after the administration of the FMXIN002 nasal spray versus autoinjector. METHODS: An open-label trial was performed in 12 adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis without asthma. Epinephrine pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety were compared between FMXIN002 (1.6 mg and 3.2 mg) administered intranasally with/without a nasal allergen challenge and IM (0.3 mg) EpiPen. RESULTS: FMXIN002 3.2 mg, administered after a nasal allergen challenge, displayed a shorter Tmax than EpiPen (median: 2.5 minutes vs 9.0 minutes, statistically nonsignificant [NS]) and a significantly shorter time when the measured analyte concentration is 100 pg/mL during the absorption phase pg/mL (median: 1.0 minutes vs 3.0 minutes for FMXIN002, P < .02). Moreover, FMXIN002 3.2 mg administered after the challenge test has resulted in a doubling of the maximal measured plasma analyte concentration over the sampling period (1110 vs 551 pg/mL, NS); area under the curve from 0 to 8 hours was 56% higher (672 vs 431 hours pg/mL, compared with EpiPen, NS). Pharmacodynamic response was comparable at all treatments. FMXIN002 was well tolerated, and treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were mild, local, and resolved spontaneously. No AEs were reported after the administration of EpiPen in our study. FMXIN002 was stable for 2 years at room temperature conditions. However, variability in the pharmacokinetics (expressed in coefficient of variation) is high. Having a prior nasal allergen challenge results in a substantial increase and speed of absorption. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal absorption of dry powder epinephrine is faster than EpiPen offering a clinical advantage in the short therapeutic window for the treatment of anaphylaxis. The FMXIN002 product offers a needle-free, pocket-size, safe, user-friendly, and stable alternative to epinephrine autoinjectors.

A Novel Faster-Acting, Dry Powder-Based, Naloxone Intranasal Formulation for Opioid Overdose.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the pharmacokinetics and safety of FMXIN001, a new intranasal powder-based naloxone formulation, in comparison to Narcan® nasal liquid spray. METHODS: FMXIN001, was developed by blending drug microspheres with larger lactose monohydrate particles, that serve as diluent and carrier, as well as a disaggregating agent. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray were used to characterize the formulation and in vitro deposition was investigated using a nasal cast. We compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of FMXIN001 versus Narcan® in two clinical trials: a pilot study with 14 healthy adults and a pivotal trial in 42 healthy adults (NCT04713709). The studies were open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover studies to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of FMXIN001 versus Narcan® nasal spray. RESULTS: FMXIN001 comprises naloxone microspheres (5-30 µM) and lactose particles (40-240 µM). Upon in vitro testing, naloxone deposits mainly to the middle turbinates region and the upper part of the nasal cavity of a nasal cast. In human subjects, FMXIN001 produced significantly higher exposure at the initial time points of 4, 10, and 30 min, post-administration, compared to Narcan®. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated. FMXIN001, powder-based spray, results in similar overall exposure to Narcan®, but with more rapid absorption in the first 30 min. CONCLUSIONS: FMXIN001 is expected to have a shorter onset of action for a more effective therapeutic intervention to manage opioid overdose. Rapid administration of naloxone in cases of opioid overdose is imperative, given the alarming increase in mortality rates.

Analysis of Azithromycin Monohydrate as a Single or a Combinatorial Therapy in a Mouse Model of Severe Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative autosomal recessive disorder characterized by the loss of α-motor neurons. A variety of molecular pathways are being investigated to elevate SMN protein expression in SMA models and in the clinic. One of these approaches involves stabilizing the SMNΔ7 protein by inducing translational read-through. Previous studies have demonstrated that functionality and stability are partially restored to the otherwise unstable SMNΔ7 by the addition of non-specific C-terminal peptide sequences, or by inducing a similar molecular event through the use of read-through inducing compounds such as aminoglycosides. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the efficacy of the macrolide Azithromycin (AZM), an FDA approved read-through-inducing compound, in the well-established severe mouse model of SMA. METHODS: Initially, dosing regimen following ICV administrations of AZM at different post-natal days and concentrations was determined by their impact on SMN levels in disease-relevant tissues. Selected dose was then tested for phenotypic parameters changes as compared to the appropriate controls and in conjugation to another therapy. RESULTS: AZM increases SMN protein in disease relevant tissues, however, this did not translate into similar improvements in the SMA phenotype in a severe mouse model of SMA. Co-administration of AZM and a previously developed antisense oligonucleotide that increases SMN2 splicing, resulted in an improvement in the SMA phenotype beyond either AZM or ASO alone, including a highly significant extension in survival with improvement in body weight and movement. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to explore various approaches for SMA therapeutics, hence compounds that specifically induce SMNΔ7 read-through, without having prohibitive toxicity, may provide an alternative platform for a combinatorial treatment. Here we established that AZM activity at a low dose can increase SMN protein in disease-relevant animal model and can impact disease severity.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of extended-release metadoxine in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of an oral extended-release (ER) formulation of the nonstimulant metadoxine in the treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: This was a 1:1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design, phase 2 study of metadoxine ER 1,400 mg/d treatment for 6 weeks, following a 2-week baseline/screening period, involving 120 adults with DSM-IV-defined ADHD. A follow-up assessment occurred 2 weeks after the trial was completed. Efficacy measures included changes in Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated (CAARS-INV) total ADHD symptoms score with adult ADHD prompts (primary measure), response rates (≥ 25% or 40% improvement in CAARS-INV total ADHD symptom score), Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) performance, and Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) total score. The study was conducted from March 15, 2011, to August 21, 2011. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis revealed that subjects receiving metadoxine ER showed statistically significant improvement in CAARS-INV total ADHD symptoms score (P = .02), higher rate of response (≥ 25% [P = .03] or ≥ 40% [P = .04] improvement) on the CAARS-INV total ADHD symptoms score, and improvement in TOVA score (P = .02) and AAQoL score (P = .01) compared with the placebo group. Improvements in ADHD symptoms (scored by CAARS-INV) were significantly different in subjects treated with metadoxine ER versus placebo as early as 2 weeks following treatment initiation. Metadoxine ER was generally well tolerated, with nausea (17% [10/58] vs 0% [0/59]), fatigue (31% [18/58] vs 27% [16/59]), and headaches (29% [17/58] vs 39% [23/59]) being the most frequently reported adverse effects for the metadoxine ER and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that metadoxine ER is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for adults with ADHD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01243242.