Spine patients demystified: what are the predictive factors of poor surgical outcome in patients after elective cervical and lumbar spine surgery?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Pre-existing comorbid psychiatric mood disorders are a known risk factor for impaired health-related quality of life and poor long-term outcomes after spine surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of preexisting mood disorders on (1) pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes, (2) complications, and (3) pre- and postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing elective cervical or lumbar spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review at a single academic institution from 2014 to 2017. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive adult patients who underwent cervical or lumbar surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative measurements of pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) and spinal region-specific disability scores (Neck Disability Index [NDI] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 435 consecutive patients (179 cervical, 256 lumbar) who underwent elective spine surgery at a single academic institution from 2014 to 2017. Patient preoperative diagnosis of psychiatric mood disorder (eg, depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, bipolar, or dementia), baseline characteristics, medical (nonpsychiatric) comorbidities, operative variables, and surgical complications (eg, superficial and deep infection, wound complication, emergency department [ED] visits, readmissions, and repeat operations) were recorded. Additionally, preoperative ED visits, pre- and postoperative opioid requirements, total opioid prescription quantities and most recent dateof opioid prescription were collected. VAS, NDI, and ODI scores were recorded preoperatively and at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery. Continuous variables were compared between those with and without diagnosed psychiatric comorbidity using two-tailed independent t test, and categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Analyses of variance and analysis of covariance were used to compare patient-reported outcomes between groups. A multivariate approach was taken to account for contribution of potential covariates in significant findings. Multiple linear regressions were used to determine variables associated with the number of postoperative opioid prescriptions. RESULTS: Of the cervical and lumbar cohorts, 78 (43.6%) and 113 (44.1%), respectively, had a preoperative diagnosis of comorbid psychiatric mood disorder. Cervical patients with mood disorders received a significantly higher total number of opioid prescriptions post-operatively (4.6±5.2 vs. 2.8±3.9; p=.002). Patients with mood disorders had worse NDI scores at all time points (p=.04), however there were no differences in VAS pain scores (p=.5). There were no statistical differences between patients with and without mood disorders regarding baseline characteristics, medical (nonpsychiatric) comorbidities, operative variables, surgical complications, preoperative ED visits or prior opioid use (p>.05). For lumbar patients, patients with mood disorders were more commonly females (p=.04), tobacco users (p=.003), alcohol dependent (p=.01) and illicit-drug abusers (p=.03). There were no differences regarding surgical complications or opioid consumption. Tobacco use (p<.001) was the sole contributor to postoperative VAS pain scores. Patients with mood disorders had significantly higher VAS values both before and 3 months following surgery (p=.01), but there was no difference in ODI scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with preoperative psychiatric mood disorders undergoing elective cervical surgery had worse NDI scores and received more opioid prescriptions, despite similar VAS scores as those without mood disorders. Lumbar surgery patients with mood disorders were demographically different than those without mood disorders and had worse pain before and after surgery, though ODI scores were not different. Tobacco use was the sole contributor to postoperative VAS pain scores. This information can be useful in counseling patients with mood disorders before elective spinal surgery.

Using Tongue Depressors as a Technique to Aid Cord Localization During Collagenase Injection For Dupuytren Disease.

Collagenase injections are used as a minimally invasive treatment for Dupuytren contracture of the palm and fingers, with good published success. Most complications are related to injection-site swelling, pain, and ecchymosis. However, the risk of flexor tendon and digital nerve injury can occur when injecting cords that cause proximal interphalangeal joint contractures. In addition, poor localization and incorrect injection of the solution into cords may result in an incomplete correction. We describe a technique to improve visualization and isolation of Dupuytren cords using a tongue depressor.

Isolated Small Finger Distal Interphalangeal Joint Dupuytren's Contracture.

Dupuytren's contracture is a disease involving abnormal myofibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition leading to the formation of pathologic cords in the hand. Given that Dupuytren's contractures rarely extend to the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP), affecting only 5% of patients, there are few cases reported in the literature. Collagenase injection is a frequently used option for minimally invasive treatment of Dupuytren's disease with greater than a 20-degree joint contracture. Unfortunately, there is limited research on the effectiveness of these injections in isolated DIP joint deformities. We present a case of a 61-year-old right hand-dominant male with a 2-year history of isolated right small finger Dupuytren's contracture at the DIP joint who achieved significant improvement after collagenase injection.

Disparities in reportable quality metrics by insurance status in the primary spine neoplasm population.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) defines "adverse quality events" as the incidence of certain complications such as postsurgical hematoma or iatrogenic pneumothorax during an inpatient stay. Patient safety indicators (PSI) are a means to measure the incidence of these adverse events. When adverse events occur, reimbursement to the hospital decreases. The incidence of adverse quality events among patients hospitalized for primary spinal neoplasms is unknown. Similarly, it is unclear what the impact of insurance status is on adverse care quality among this patient population. PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the incidence of PSI among patients admitted with primary spinal neoplasms, and to determine the association between insurance status and the incidence of PSI in this population. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: We included all patients, 18 years and older, in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) who were hospitalized for primary spine neoplasms from 1998 to 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of PSI from 1998 to 2011 served as outcome variable. METHODS: The NIS was queried for all hospitalizations with a diagnosis of primary spinal neoplasm during the inpatient episode from 1998 to 2011. Incidence of PSI was determined using publicly available lists of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. Logistic regression models were used to determine the effect of primary payer status on PSI incidence. All comparisons were made between privately insured patients and Medicaid or self-pay patients. RESULTS: We identified 6,095 hospitalizations in which a primary spinal neoplasm was recorded during the inpatient episode. We excluded patients younger than 18 years and those with "other" or "missing" primary insurance status, leaving 5,880 patients for analysis. After adjusting for patient demographics and hospital characteristics, Medicaid or self-pay patients had significantly greater odds of experiencing one or more PSI (odds ratio [OR] 1.81 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.95) relative to privately insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized for primary spinal neoplasms, primary payer status predicts the incidence of PSI, an indicator of adverse health-care quality used to determine hospital reimbursement by the CMS. As reimbursement continues to be intertwined with reportable quality metrics, identifying vulnerable populations is critical to improving patient care.

Comparison of clinical outcomes in decompression and fusion versus decompression only in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a pathological calcification or ossification of the PLL, predominantly occurring in the cervical spine. Although surgery is often necessary for patients with symptomatic neurological deterioration, there remains controversy with regard to the optimal surgical treatment. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors identified differences in complications and outcomes after anterior or posterior decompression and fusion versus after decompression alone for the treatment of cervical myelopathy due to OPLL. METHODS A MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science search was performed for studies reporting complications and outcomes after decompression and fusion or after decompression alone for patients with OPLL. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate effect summary mean values, 95% CIs, Q statistics, and I(2) values. Forest plots were constructed for each analysis group. RESULTS Of the 2630 retrieved articles, 32 met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of excellent and good outcomes and of fair and poor outcomes between the decompression and fusion and the decompression-only cohorts. However, the decompression and fusion cohort had a statistically significantly higher recovery rate (63.2% vs 53.9%; p < 0.0001), a higher final Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (14.0 vs 13.5; p < 0.0001), and a lower incidence of OPLL progression (< 1% vs 6.3%; p < 0.0001) compared with the decompression-only cohort. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS This study represents the only comprehensive review of outcomes and complications after decompression and fusion or after decompression alone for OPLL across a heterogeneous group of surgeons and patients. Based on these results, decompression and fusion is a superior surgical technique compared with posterior decompression alone in patients with OPLL. These results indicate that surgical decompression and fusion lead to a faster recovery, improved postoperative neurological functioning, and a lower incidence of OPLL progression compared with posterior decompression only. Furthermore, decompression and fusion did not lead to a greater incidence of complications compared with posterior decompression only.

Latissimus Dorsi and Teres Major Injuries in Major League Baseball Pitchers: A Systematic Review.

Injuries to the upper extremity in baseball pitchers are not uncommon, with extensive literature on shoulder and elbow pathology. However, there is minimal literature on isolated teres major (TM) and latissimus dorsi (LD) injuries. As a result, there is no consensus on an optimal treatment method. An extensive Medline search on studies focusing on the treatment of isolated LD and TM injuries in professional baseball pitchers was performed to explore this topic. Of the 20 retrieved articles, 5 met our inclusion criteria. There were a total of 29 patients who underwent conservative treatment and 1 who underwent surgical treatment. The average time required to return to pitching was 99.8 days in the conservative group and 140 days in the surgically treated group. Five patients in the conservative group suffered from complications and/or setbacks during their treatment and rehabilitation. The lone surgical patient suffered no complications, returned to preinjury form, and was elected an all-star the following year. The goal of this review is to provide a concise summary of the current literature in order to assist physicians when discussing treatment options with their patients.